Bad Reffing? Holmes catch a Catch?· Page 3

gergobacsi
Rookie

16 years ago

I just got this link in an e-mail....
Might be something to discuss.

http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/2009/2/2/745183/santoenio-holmes

blank

Packers_Finland
Registered

16 years ago

#22

There's a discussion about this in the General forum. I think there's not nearly enough evidence to overturn it. IMO it is a catch. But I will not bash anyone who thinks it's not. Because I thought so too until I saw better.

This is a placeholder

Stevetarded
Registered

16 years ago

#23

I don't think it really matters. It was so close that you can't really blame the ref for calling it a catch. I don't know what all angles the refs get for reviewing but from all of the ones that I saw during the game it didn't show enough to overturn the call anyways.

blank

gergobacsi
Rookie

16 years ago

#24

I'm sorry. I didn't check out the new posts. My fault.

blank

wils0646
Registered

16 years ago

#25

LOL

118 time stamp is before the photo Trom posted

It shows the right foot's toes are on the ground THEN he starts to fall forward and then that is when the pic Trom posted happens

dirt ?? from right foot

57 sec mark is a second or so before Troms photo..Which to me clearly looks like the right toes are bent which means toes on ground.

http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d80e84f48

But it does not matter...Kurt Warner blew this game he couldnt get them a score with 30 secs left

"tromadz" wrote:

I know the pic i posted is the later end of the play, but im showing what the feet were doing.

Thanks for the 208X250 sized pic of squintyness. Show me something better(please, show me, I want to end this one way or the other)

"longtimefan" wrote:

This should end this debate:

http://www.steelersdepot.com/blog/2009/02/picture-of-santonio-holmes-with-2-two-feet-down-for-touchdown/

The Pack Will Be Back.

Yerko
Senior Member

16 years ago

#26

This should end this debate:

http://www.steelersdepot.com/blog/2009/02/picture-of-santonio-holmes-with-2-two-feet-down-for-touchdown/

"wils0646" wrote:

Not that I care, but you do not see the ball in these pictures so he can have two feet down all he wants at this point. Where is the ball now?

Rockmolder
Honored Member

16 years ago

#27

Not that I care, but you do not see the ball in these pictures so he can have two feet down all he wants at this point. Where is the ball now?

"AKamp74" wrote:

http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d80e84a39&filter=cant-miss-plays&categoryId=featured

At the time that Fransisco touches him, he seems to have possesion, so since he has his hands on Holmes at the point of the picture, it's a TD.

Not that it really matters anyway. It's happend, not enough evidence to overturn it and they shouldn't have given up a TD in that case anyway. Three guys around him and he can still make the catch before anyone can even force him out.

This seems to be more about Cardinals fans and supporters (at least for this game, like me) being in disbelieve that this could happen after getting the lead. Just giving up the TD so easily.

Anyone noticed that Fransisco was the guy being in the wrong position in both of the last two big plays, btw?

Pack93z
Select Member

16 years ago

#28

Shades of Nate Poole... let us rejoice in remembrance of that fateful catch that knocked our brothers from the west out of the playoffs. :lol:

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

vikesrule
Registered

16 years ago

#29

Shades of Nate Poole... let us rejoice in remembrance of that fateful catch that knocked our brothers from the west out of the playoffs. :lol:

"pack93z" wrote:

Tsk, tsk, tsk....I prefer to remember Freddie Mitchell.

What was that again? ...4th.....4th and something. :thumbleft:

longtimefan
Registered

16 years ago

#30

Shades of Nate Poole... let us rejoice in remembrance of that fateful catch that knocked our brothers from the west out of the playoffs. :lol:

"vikesrule" wrote:

Tsk, tsk, tsk....I prefer to remember Freddie Mitchell.

What was that again? ...4th.....4th and something. :thumbleft:

"pack93z" wrote:

Key word was playoffs..Packers in it, Poole made the Viks not get in them 😛

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (8h) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (12h) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (12h) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (13h) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (13h) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (13h) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (13h) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (13h) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (13h) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (13h) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (13h) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (13h) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (14h) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (14h) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (14h) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (14h) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (15h) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16h) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16h) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb

wpr (9-Apr) : yay

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'

Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22