Barfarn
  • Barfarn
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
9 years ago

No, it's not. You have no idea if Tolzein would have seen JJ or Cobb on those specific plays and no idea if he would have completed the pass if he did see them. That's ignoring the very obvious problem that play calling would be different depending on how preceding plays unfolded. For all we know, Tolzein may well have missed a play earlier in those drives ending the possession before we even had a chance to miss JJ or Cobb.

There was no one within 10 yards of Jones. If Rodgers had thrown the ball low, that would have been a poor throw as well. It should have been on the numbers. Regardless, Jones had a clear line of sight and was stationary. There's no excuse for not going up and getting that ball.

I find the trend to put all the blame on either Rodgers or the receivers tiresome. Rodgers is paid to make smart decisions, find the open man, and put the ball in the optimal spot to catch it. The receivers are paid to run sharp routes, get open, and catch anything and everything that comes within their wing span. Neither have done their jobs these past 6 weeks. I'm not going to give Jones a pass because Rodgers didn't do his job and I'm not going to give Rodgers a pass because Jones didn't do his either.



I can't take this seriously. There's plenty to criticize Rodgers for without pushing this absurd narrative. Do you honestly think Lacy has played up to his standard last year or the running game in general? Would Tolzein retroactively heal Lacy's sprained ankle? Would Tolzein convince Lacy to make curfew? Starks ran for 12 yards on the first two plays. Starks and Lacy combined for 7 yards on their remaining 12 runs. Does Tolzein fix that issue?

Do you think Cobb is playing up to his standard? Davante Adams couldn't catch a beach ball right now slathered in stick'em. No one has stepped up to fill Jordy's void. Does Tolzein heal Cobb's shoulder or fix Adams' hands?

You simply aren't being objective claiming the only player that has regressed this year is Rodgers.

Originally Posted by: mi_keys 



LOL Ted Thompson gave you 1.35 Million reasons why Tolzein would make those throws. It's not sandlot football [hey, everyone go out I'll hit the open man]. See, the GB offensive play typically sends receivers in patterns to come open at staggered times-Then QB goes thru a progression: the QB looks receiver #1 if he open he throws, if not he goes to #2 [I can explain this in more detail if you need it]. See for whatever play was called, ST would go threw his PROGRESSIONS and if he refused, like AR, or failed to work through his progressions he simply wouldn't be on the team.

In the last few weeks I've charted every one of his snaps in PS over the last 2 years. The guy finds and hits the open man and runs through the progressions as well as AR can. His anticipation is slightly less, he's not as accurate and cant make some of AR's throws. Oh and BTW, many times he wasn't throwing to #1 receivers.

On the JJ INT, you again don't understand the Offense and are just WRONG. Last year those throws where receiver is laying out of Bounds with feet in bounds or those throws where the WR went to ground to catch ball was not at all the bi-product of inaccuracy THAT IS THE MOST EFFICIENT PLACE TO PUT THE BALL. THAT IS THE WAS IT IS PRACTICED. Sandlot to JV HS ball dont work like this!

You're projecting what know and what you see on TV and somehow assume JJ sees what you see. JJ doesn't know if safety is bearing down and has practiced w/ AR that if the safety is coming the throw goes LOW, between the knee and ankles! JJ doesn't know exactly what AR sees, so he's ready to catch ball between the #'s and ankles and thinking about who's closer left or right becuse the throw will skew to the side where defender is furthest away. The idea a WR expects a throw like this to the numbers is patently naive.

As for the rest keep to your vague generalizations and only consider things that support a silly bias and your idol will be secure. I've provided probably 50 factual examples of AR doings things he NEVER did before; I mean horrific things and you've provided ZERO rebuttal to that. He even admitted he was scared. Again, if the Packers traded AR for Cutler b4 Denver game, You'd all be screaming TT, YOU ASSHOLE, look what you did. Okay so it's still AR, playing like Cutler, so where's the outrage. We have one of the worst offenses in the NFL over the last 6 games.

Sure the OL isn't playing as well as 2014 and running game lacks at times and injuries and Adams/Cobb have had a few drops and blah blah blah. You need to factor in AR's role in these perceived and real deficiencies and how in the past he has managed to minimize the harm of these clunks in destroying the offense [Note: that's why we love him]. All that stuff was occurring for EACH of the last several years. And every time these clunks occurred it hurt the offense; but didn't turn it to crap. All the clunks drop the O maybe from #3 to #6 or #10 at worst. It is 100% AR's fault the O has gone from #3 to low 20's.

Evaluate each of AR's plays in 1st half in Det. to his usual baseline of performance, educate yourself, then get back to me.

And to address Z2C, yea I take an 80% AR over 100% Tolzein; But AR is only 20% of what he was.
DoddPower
9 years ago

LOL Ted Thompson gave you 1.35 Million reasons why Tolzein would make those throws. It's not sandlot football [hey, everyone go out I'll hit the open man]. See, the GB offensive play typically sends receivers in patterns to come open at staggered times-Then QB goes thru a progression: the QB looks receiver #1 if he open he throws, if not he goes to #2 [I can explain this in more detail if you need it]. See for whatever play was called, ST would go threw his PROGRESSIONS and if he refused, like AR, or failed to work through his progressions he simply wouldn't be on the team.

In the last few weeks I've charted every one of his snaps in PS over the last 2 years. The guy finds and hits the open man and runs through the progressions as well as Aaron Rodgers can. His anticipation is slightly less, he's not as accurate and cant make some of AR's throws. Oh and BTW, many times he wasn't throwing to #1 receivers.

On the JJ INT, you again don't understand the Offense and are just WRONG. Last year those throws where receiver is laying out of Bounds with feet in bounds or those throws where the WR went to ground to catch ball was not at all the bi-product of inaccuracy THAT IS THE MOST EFFICIENT PLACE TO PUT THE BALL. THAT IS THE WAS IT IS PRACTICED. Sandlot to JV HS ball dont work like this!

You're projecting what know and what you see on TV and somehow assume JJ sees what you see. JJ doesn't know if safety is bearing down and has practiced w/ Aaron Rodgers that if the safety is coming the throw goes LOW, between the knee and ankles! JJ doesn't know exactly what Aaron Rodgers sees, so he's ready to catch ball between the #'s and ankles and thinking about who's closer left or right becuse the throw will skew to the side where defender is furthest away. The idea a WR expects a throw like this to the numbers is patently naive.

As for the rest keep to your vague generalizations and only consider things that support a silly bias and your idol will be secure. I've provided probably 50 factual examples of Aaron Rodgers doings things he NEVER did before; I mean horrific things and you've provided ZERO rebuttal to that. He even admitted he was scared. Again, if the Packers traded Aaron Rodgers for Cutler b4 Denver game, You'd all be screaming TT, YOU ASSHOLE, look what you did. Okay so it's still AR, playing like Cutler, so where's the outrage. We have one of the worst offenses in the NFL over the last 6 games.

Sure the OL isn't playing as well as 2014 and running game lacks at times and injuries and Adams/Cobb have had a few drops and blah blah blah. You need to factor in AR's role in these perceived and real deficiencies and how in the past he has managed to minimize the harm of these clunks in destroying the offense [Note: that's why we love him]. All that stuff was occurring for EACH of the last several years. And every time these clunks occurred it hurt the offense; but didn't turn it to crap. All the clunks drop the O maybe from #3 to #6 or #10 at worst. It is 100% AR's fault the O has gone from #3 to low 20's.

Evaluate each of AR's plays in 1st half in Det. to his usual baseline of performance, educate yourself, then get back to me.

And to address Z2C, yea I take an 80% Aaron Rodgers over 100% Tolzein; But Aaron Rodgers is only 20% of what he was.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



zzzzzzz 😍 🇧🇫


UserPostedImageUserPostedImage
voiceofreason
9 years ago

LOL Ted Thompson gave you 1.35 Million reasons why Tolzein would make those throws. It's not sandlot football [hey, everyone go out I'll hit the open man]. See, the GB offensive play typically sends receivers in patterns to come open at staggered times-Then QB goes thru a progression: the QB looks receiver #1 if he open he throws, if not he goes to #2 [I can explain this in more detail if you need it]. See for whatever play was called, ST would go threw his PROGRESSIONS and if he refused, like AR, or failed to work through his progressions he simply wouldn't be on the team.

In the last few weeks I've charted every one of his snaps in PS over the last 2 years. The guy finds and hits the open man and runs through the progressions as well as Aaron Rodgers can. His anticipation is slightly less, he's not as accurate and cant make some of AR's throws. Oh and BTW, many times he wasn't throwing to #1 receivers.

On the JJ INT, you again don't understand the Offense and are just WRONG. Last year those throws where receiver is laying out of Bounds with feet in bounds or those throws where the WR went to ground to catch ball was not at all the bi-product of inaccuracy THAT IS THE MOST EFFICIENT PLACE TO PUT THE BALL. THAT IS THE WAS IT IS PRACTICED. Sandlot to JV HS ball dont work like this!

You're projecting what know and what you see on TV and somehow assume JJ sees what you see. JJ doesn't know if safety is bearing down and has practiced w/ Aaron Rodgers that if the safety is coming the throw goes LOW, between the knee and ankles! JJ doesn't know exactly what Aaron Rodgers sees, so he's ready to catch ball between the #'s and ankles and thinking about who's closer left or right becuse the throw will skew to the side where defender is furthest away. The idea a WR expects a throw like this to the numbers is patently naive.

As for the rest keep to your vague generalizations and only consider things that support a silly bias and your idol will be secure. I've provided probably 50 factual examples of Aaron Rodgers doings things he NEVER did before; I mean horrific things and you've provided ZERO rebuttal to that. He even admitted he was scared. Again, if the Packers traded Aaron Rodgers for Cutler b4 Denver game, You'd all be screaming TT, YOU ASSHOLE, look what you did. Okay so it's still AR, playing like Cutler, so where's the outrage. We have one of the worst offenses in the NFL over the last 6 games.

Sure the OL isn't playing as well as 2014 and running game lacks at times and injuries and Adams/Cobb have had a few drops and blah blah blah. You need to factor in AR's role in these perceived and real deficiencies and how in the past he has managed to minimize the harm of these clunks in destroying the offense [Note: that's why we love him]. All that stuff was occurring for EACH of the last several years. And every time these clunks occurred it hurt the offense; but didn't turn it to crap. All the clunks drop the O maybe from #3 to #6 or #10 at worst. It is 100% AR's fault the O has gone from #3 to low 20's.

Evaluate each of AR's plays in 1st half in Det. to his usual baseline of performance, educate yourself, then get back to me.

And to address Z2C, yea I take an 80% Aaron Rodgers over 100% Tolzein; But Aaron Rodgers is only 20% of what he was.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



Your post is condescending as usual, everyone your legitimately arguing with knows what QB progressions are so why even go there. Also, half your arguments ramble angrily as if you furiously headbutted them into the keyboard rather than typed them out with care. You claim my arguments are "vague generalizations"? I have used cold hard statistics while you have responded with gut feelings and personal observations(I dont care how good Tolzien looks on the practice squad). I 100% agree Rodgers has been under performing all season but benching him is not the answer.


blank
mi_keys
9 years ago

LOL Ted Thompson gave you 1.35 Million reasons why Tolzein would make those throws.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



And? Colt McCoy makes more than that. Tarvaris Jackson makes more than that. Blaine Gabbert makes more than that. According to Spotrac, there are 49 quarterbacks in the NFL that make more than Tolzien.

It's not sandlot football [hey, everyone go out I'll hit the open man].

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



Straw man.

See, the GB offensive play typically sends receivers in patterns to come open at staggered times-Then QB goes thru a progression: the QB looks receiver #1 if he open he throws, if not he goes to #2 [I can explain this in more detail if you need it]. See for whatever play was called, ST would go threw his PROGRESSIONS and if he refused, like AR, or failed to work through his progressions he simply wouldn't be on the team.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



We know. But by all means continue being a condescending child about it.

In the last few weeks I've charted every one of his snaps in PS over the last 2 years.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



I'll assume by 'PS' you mean preseason. So a little over 100 passing plays.

The guy finds and hits the open man and runs through the progressions as well as Aaron Rodgers can. His anticipation is slightly less, he's not as accurate and cant make some of AR's throws. Oh and BTW, many times he wasn't throwing to #1 receivers.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



Nor was he competing against number one defenses or exotic defensive schemes.

On the JJ INT, you again don't understand the Offense and are just WRONG.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



There was no one near Jones. Why would you put it low and effectively eliminate the chance for YAC?

You're projecting what know and what you see on TV and somehow assume JJ sees what you see. JJ doesn't know if safety is bearing down and has practiced w/ Aaron Rodgers that if the safety is coming the throw goes LOW, between the knee and ankles!

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



It’s not as if Jones ran his route with blind folds on or has zero clue what the coverage is.


JJ doesn't know exactly what Aaron Rodgers sees, so he's ready to catch ball between the #'s and ankles and thinking about who's closer left or right becuse the throw will skew to the side where defender is furthest away. The idea a WR expects a throw like this to the numbers is patently naive.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



So which is it: he expects it low or he has to react to where the quarterback puts the ball based on the coverage?

We see players settle in the soft spot in a zone and get the ball on the numbers all the time. Again, if there is room then why sacrifice the chance for YAC?

And even if Jones expected the ball low, it had to travel 25 plus yards in the air. If that’s not enough time to react to where a ball is going--when stationary with a clear line of sight--then how the hell does he ever adjust to or catch quick slants or button hooks designed to arrive as soon as he turns?

As for the rest keep to your vague generalizations and only consider things that support a silly bias and your idol will be secure.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



Point me to where I’m idol worshipping. I’ve said there have been plenty of things to criticize about his play.

I've provided probably 50 factual examples of Aaron Rodgers doings things he NEVER did before; I mean horrific things and you've provided ZERO rebuttal to that.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



And most people on this forum agree this is the worst they’ve seen him play in a long time. Almost no one is debating that point.

He even admitted he was scared. Again, if the Packers traded Aaron Rodgers for Cutler b4 Denver game, You'd all be screaming TT, YOU ASSHOLE, look what you did. Okay so it's still AR, playing like Cutler, so where's the outrage.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



For all we love to take the piss out of Jay Cutler, he actually is an NFL starting quarterback. Tolzien is not.

Besides, Cutler’s paid $18.1M a year so he must be like a god.

We have one of the worst offenses in the NFL over the last 6 games.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



And everyone on the forum is bemoaning this fact. No one is saying the offense has been good of late.

Sure the OL isn't playing as well as 2014 and running game lacks at times and injuries and Adams/Cobb have had a few drops and blah blah blah.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



Then why did you say the other 10 people on the field are playing at the same level if that’s clearly not the case?

You need to factor in AR's role in these perceived and real deficiencies and how in the past he has managed to minimize the harm of these clunks in destroying the offense [Note: that's why we love him].

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



The quarterback gets too much blame/credit cliché.

All that stuff was occurring for EACH of the last several years.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



This directly contradicts what you conceded above about the offensive line not playing as well as in 2014. It’s also not borne out by objective measures.

And every time these clunks occurred it hurt the offense; but didn't turn it to crap. All the clunks drop the O maybe from #3 to #6 or #10 at worst. It is 100% AR's fault the O has gone from #3 to low 20's.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



But that contradiction is okay because it’s all Aaron’s fault! Is it Aaron’s fault we have had four starters on the line miss time this year? Does the line have nothing to do with giving up more sacks through 12 games than through all of last year? Is it Aaron’s fault Lacy and Starks now have fumbling problems? Is it Aaron’s fault we lead the NFL in drops from weeks 4 through 11 with 23 drops?

Evaluate each of AR's plays in 1st half in Det. to his usual baseline of performance, educate yourself, then get back to me.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



This grows tiresome. I’ll get back to you when you stop acting like a petulant child.

Born and bred a cheesehead
Zero2Cool
9 years ago
YOU'RE ALL WRONG!!! We need to start not Aaron, not Scott, but Brett Hundley!!!


Schooled you were yes.


Bahahahahahhha
UserPostedImage
OlHoss1884
9 years ago
Anyone know if Jim Del Gaizo is looking for work?
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits" --Albert Einstein
nerdmann
9 years ago

YOU'RE ALL WRONG!!! We need to start not Aaron, not Scott, but Brett Hundley!!!


Schooled you were yes.


Bahahahahahhha

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Give Hundley a year or two.

Fact is, if Aaron is not going to play within the system, then he should take a seat, imo. Waiting until things break down so you can freelance and throw deep is putting this team into the shitter. Dude needs to get with the program.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Barfarn
  • Barfarn
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
9 years ago

Your post is condescending as usual, everyone your legitimately arguing with knows what QB progressions are so why even go there. Also, half your arguments ramble angrily as if you furiously headbutted them into the keyboard rather than typed them out with care. You claim my arguments are "vague generalizations"? I have used cold hard statistics while you have responded with gut feelings and personal observations(I dont care how good Tolzien looks on the practice squad). I 100% agree Rodgers has been under performing all season but benching him is not the answer.

Originally Posted by: voiceofreason 



I wouldn't say condescending; being a bit more remedial was IMHO necessary. One "who knows," knows that QBs that go thru their progressions don't miss "seeing" their receivers. And note your and his latest response foisted the idea that an evaluation can't be done on 100 snaps. MI Keys is only correct on this concept if the analysis is purely statistical because a larger sample is needed. If you watch a QB do his job for 100 plays and grade how he: reacts/avoids a free rusher; audibles to runs or passes; throws accurately; goes throw progressions; looks off his receivers; whether he "breaks;" sees and hits hot read on blitz; throws ball away to avoids a sack; extends plays on those RARE occasions that all receivers are covered; etc etc etc. If he's proficient 100%/20% of the time, that's more than enough info to properly evaluate that a guy can play/sucks. And this gets you to 90% of what the Staff knows about him [if you guess correctly as to what the responsibility was in the play].

AR is doing bad? Really? Sounds like an interesting debate [rolling eyes] 😂. Do we really have to come to a forum and post that?

I think what's interesting is WHY and WHAT SHOULD BE DONE.

MM correctly said "stats are for losers." What MM is really saying is stats are used by people to portend knowledge and/or support illogically arrived at opinions [which could by chance be true]. MM is saying you dont grade in this case, AR by Passer rating; but you evaluate him on how well he performed WITHIN THE SCHEME.

Let me give you an example: a great WCO QB goes 22-24-160 and dinks and dunk to a 1st at the 1 and RB scores 3 running TD's his rating is 94; If one of the INCs was a perfect pass was dropped/deflected and INT, the PR is 77; if he throws 3 TD passes his rating is 134. The QB's value in the scheme is identical in all 3 situations, yet his rating goes from 77 to 134.

So go ahead, spout your worthless stats; curse at those who disagree with your opinion that we're 12-4 w/ a QB w/ a 95 PR. It's up to you. But what I'm tying to do is get you to realize you dont know what your talking about.

Here two things: (1) I'm not you, dont think like you, nor react like you in anyway; (2) If you want to evaluate whether Tolzein should replace AR the reasonable voice begins the with an EVALUATION OF HOW THEY COMPARABLY PERFORM, not cursing out superficial stats.

I have spent several hours preparing and have posting some very detailed analyses of AR's performance w/in he scheme. EG posted evaluations of every INC in one game. So your vague generalization allegation is, well let's say, misplaced. My in depth analysis of AR's play leads to one immutable fact: AR's problems are attitude based.

And again, I'm not arguing that Tolzein should replace AR; we cant win the SB with Tolzein. But we cant win the SB with this version of AR either. So what the fu%% should be done? When Crosby had the yips a few years back, he was working his butt off to get over it; benching him would do no good. Lacy lost motivation, benching him at least temporarily motivated him to 2 really good performances [that BTW, just happen to coincide w/ 2 good stat games]. I'm 90% convinced AR's problem is a bad attitude; his yips come from him knowing deep down that he's not as mentally well prepared. AR needs to know if he doesnt perform within the game plan; he'll be replaced; if he thinks himself untouchable and is, we're going to be very depressed Packer fans over the next 8 years.

So, if you want to discuss the topic of AR's replacement with me; then you will need to bring opinion/argument based on real football talk/analysis not cursing, insults and/or mindless stat spouting.

Of the 2014 games I evaluated last year to date [i didn't do any of these evaluations last year]; there are 3 games that not one single INC was attributable to AR; worst game 4!!!!! Two failures to miss hot reads in 9 games! TWO. that's why he was rarely blitzed. Those are cold hard stats!
nerdmann
9 years ago

I wouldn't say condescending; being a bit more remedial was IMHO necessary. One "who knows," knows that QBs that go thru their progressions don't miss "seeing" their receivers. And note your and his latest response foisted the idea that an evaluation can't be done on 100 snaps. MI Keys is only correct on this concept if the analysis is purely statistical because a larger sample is needed. If you watch a QB do his job for 100 plays and grade how he: reacts/avoids a free rusher; audibles to runs or passes; throws accurately; goes throw progressions; looks off his receivers; whether he "breaks;" sees and hits hot read on blitz; throws ball away to avoids a sack; extends plays on those RARE occasions that all receivers are covered; etc etc etc. If he's proficient 100%/20% of the time, that's more than enough info to properly evaluate that a guy can play/sucks. And this gets you to 90% of what the Staff knows about him [if you guess correctly as to what the responsibility was in the play].

Aaron Rodgers is doing bad? Really? Sounds like an interesting debate [rolling eyes] 😂. Do we really have to come to a forum and post that?

I think what's interesting is WHY and WHAT SHOULD BE DONE.

Mike McCarthy correctly said "stats are for losers." What Mike McCarthy is really saying is stats are used by people to portend knowledge and/or support illogically arrived at opinions [which could by chance be true]. Mike McCarthy is saying you dont grade in this case, Aaron Rodgers by Passer rating; but you evaluate him on how well he performed WITHIN THE SCHEME.

Let me give you an example: a great WCO QB goes 22-24-160 and dinks and dunk to a 1st at the 1 and RB scores 3 running TD's his rating is 94; If one of the INCs was a perfect pass was dropped/deflected and INT, the PR is 77; if he throws 3 TD passes his rating is 134. The QB's value in the scheme is identical in all 3 situations, yet his rating goes from 77 to 134.

So go ahead, spout your worthless stats; curse at those who disagree with your opinion that we're 12-4 w/ a QB w/ a 95 PR. It's up to you. But what I'm tying to do is get you to realize you dont know what your talking about.

Here two things: (1) I'm not you, dont think like you, nor react like you in anyway; (2) If you want to evaluate whether Tolzein should replace Aaron Rodgers the reasonable voice begins the with an EVALUATION OF HOW THEY COMPARABLY PERFORM, not cursing out superficial stats.

I have spent several hours preparing and have posting some very detailed analyses of AR's performance w/in he scheme. EG posted evaluations of every INC in one game. So your vague generalization allegation is, well let's say, misplaced. My in depth analysis of AR's play leads to one immutable fact: AR's problems are attitude based.

And again, I'm not arguing that Tolzein should replace AR; we cant win the SB with Tolzein. But we cant win the SB with this version of Aaron Rodgers either. So what the fu%% should be done? When Crosby had the yips a few years back, he was working his butt off to get over it; benching him would do no good. Lacy lost motivation, benching him at least temporarily motivated him to 2 really good performances [that BTW, just happen to coincide w/ 2 good stat games]. I'm 90% convinced AR's problem is a bad attitude; his yips come from him knowing deep down that he's not as mentally well prepared. Aaron Rodgers needs to know if he doesnt perform within the game plan; he'll be replaced; if he thinks himself untouchable and is, we're going to be very depressed Packer fans over the next 8 years.

So, if you want to discuss the topic of AR's replacement with me; then you will need to bring opinion/argument based on real football talk/analysis not cursing, insults and/or mindless stat spouting.

Of the 2014 games I evaluated last year to date [i didn't do any of these evaluations last year]; there are 3 games that not one single INC was attributable to AR; worst game 4!!!!! Two failures to miss hot reads in 9 games! TWO. that's why he was rarely blitzed. Those are cold hard stats!

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



I bet Tolzien would take the ball from under center on third and 1. That's the type of thing we believe Aaron is unwilling to do, because he's such a SUPERSTAR.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Porforis
9 years ago

I bet Tolzien would take the ball from under center on third and 1. That's the type of thing we believe Aaron is unwilling to do, because he's such a SUPERSTAR.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Where are you getting Rodgers openly disregarding offensive playcalls because he's a diva from?
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2m) : Clifford hasn't been the same since losing 8
dfosterf (1h) : Sean Clifford would probably disagree
dfosterf (1h) : Canuck Cannon. Got a very good feeling about this
Zero2Cool (2h) : Tom Pelissero also reports what bboy stated
bboystyle (2h) : The Green Bay Packers on Monday signed Taylor Elgersma, the Canadian-born quarterback who tried out at the team’s rookie camp last weekend
beast (3h) : There were reports four days ago that the Packers were signing QB Taylor Elgersma, but no official action since
Zero2Cool (4h) : And for Ian Rapoport to announce Saints send 1st and 2nd rounder to Packers for Malik Willis.
dfosterf (5h) : *Elgersma*
dfosterf (5h) : Today would be a good day to discover the Pack signed Taylor Engersma, the Canadian QB
Zero2Cool (11-May) : It wasn't. He simply wanted his money back. They refused. Cops came. They gave him his money in end.
dfosterf (11-May) : Fortunately it doesn't sound like a big deal
Zero2Cool (10-May) : Elgton Jenkins Involved In Strip Club Dispute ... Cops Called To Mitigate
Zero2Cool (10-May) : Derek Carr retires. Shoulder must be bad.
Zero2Cool (10-May) : Packers Pro Shop is not currently printing Golden #22 jerseys “until his number is confirmed after Training Camp.”
greengold (9-May) : My impression is he's a Peruvian soccer fan not a bares fan.
Martha Careful (9-May) : Favored Illinois Bishop?
beast (9-May) : Technically, the I in FIB stands for Italian now, Si?
dfosterf (8-May) : I never thought I'd live long enough to call a pope a FIB, but here we are
Martha Careful (8-May) : Chicago produces a pope before it produces a 4000 yard passing quarterback
wpr (8-May) : HAHAHA Mucky Comment of the day.
Mucky Tundra (8-May) : According to reports, Mel Kiper is furious that Sanders wasn't selected as the new Pope
Zero2Cool (8-May) : Time taken to get picked:
Zero2Cool (8-May) : New Pope: 2 days | Shedeur Sanders: 3 days
Zero2Cool (8-May) : Collin Whitchurch @cowhitchurch · 1h Chicago got a pope before it got a QB to throw for 4,000 yards in a season.
Mucky Tundra (8-May) : New Pope from Chicago; in other words, the city produced a Pope before a 4000 yard passer
beast (7-May) : My first name starts with R and my beer belly is quite voluptuous! Thank you for noticing 😏
Zero2Cool (7-May) : beast, you're just one R from being voluptuous.
Zero2Cool (7-May) : And now some Packers blogger is like Doubs to Steelers makes sense!!!!
Zero2Cool (7-May) : You saw me Tweet???
beast (7-May) : Supposedly Steelers will be trading WR George Pickens to the Cowboys for a 3rd and late round pick swap
Zero2Cool (5-May) : Ravens release Justin Tucker, err D. Watson Jr?
Zero2Cool (5-May) : Cardinals have signed TE Josiah Deguara.
Zero2Cool (5-May) : If I were to "Google" it, then I wouldn't read it in your words.
Martha Careful (5-May) : Yes, in the military S2’s work on IPB, PERCEC, PHYSEC and IO
dfosterf (4-May) : FYI civilian companies swipe the S2 designation from the military. S2 is the intelligence branch up to brigade level. G2 is division level.
dfosterf (4-May) : Google it. Make sure to tack NFL on it or you will get the military meaning
Zero2Cool (4-May) : S2?
beast (4-May) : Seems like the S2 has a love/hate relationship with professional scouts.
beast (4-May) : In theory, the S2 test how quickly a QBs brain can solve game like issues and how quickly they can do it.
dfosterf (4-May) : Are you gentlemen and at least one lady familiar with the S2 cognition
Zero2Cool (4-May) : Maybe there isn't an issue.
beast (4-May) : NFL really needs to fix their position labeling issue, but I don't think they care
Zero2Cool (1-May) : Packers did not activate the fifth-year options for linebacker Quay Walker, with the goal of signing him to a contract extension.
Zero2Cool (1-May) : Matthew Golden spoke with Randall Cobb before draft. Looked like chance encounter.
packerfanoutwest (1-May) : from a head left turn?
packerfanoutwest (1-May) : someone drunk?
Zero2Cool (1-May) : Unlikely.
dfosterf (30-Apr) : How long until Jeff Sperbeck's family sues John Elway ?
Zero2Cool (30-Apr) : Packers are exercising the fifth-year option on DT Devonte Wyatt, locking in a guaranteed $12.9M for the 2026 season.
beast (30-Apr) : Sounds like P Luke Elzinga has a rookie try out opportunity from the Titans
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Around The NFL / beast

4h / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

9-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

9-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

8-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

8-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.