This would be bad. This would be very bad. I get a daily dose of this "question", as one of the channels I get is dedicated to local sports. This means I get to listen to the likes of Sal Pal.
The consensus seems to be that Donovan is going to sit down with ownership and demand a renegotiation of his contract. He has (I think) two years left on his existing deal. He was angered by the signing of Kolb, and his benching is what has made him decide to start making some demands. McNabb has always been a "company man", but that is apparently going to change. It appears to me that the media and ownership (the owner also appears on the show regularly) are coming to the realization that they cannot afford to lose McNabb. In my opinion, the Green Bay Packers are extremely lucky that Kolb sucked when McNabb was benched.
What is NOW being closely examined in Philadelphia is the lack of supporting cast wide-receiver-wise, and the thought that the Eagles must give McNabb better weapons. The running theme is that the Eagles wide receivers are vastly overpaid and under-performing.
Bottom line looks like McNabb will get a new contract if/when he asks for it.
The talking heads seem to think he isn't going to ask, he is going to demand one, even though he technically has no leverage. His leverage seems to be that the Eagles have PR problems with the fanbase, and McNabb has always been that "Company Man".
McNabb on the Vikings would murder us, imo.