Don't be fooled by 6-2: Packers can't do much right these days· Page 2

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

9 years ago

I all but guarantee but the difference in snap count is a product of the difference in offenses played and which packages are on the field. Not a matter of play of Peppers and perry. I would wager a huge portion of those snaps both Perry and Peppers were on the field.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

greengold
Member

9 years ago

#12

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins

Yeah Rodney seems to be ignoring Perry's injury trying to show cause and effect there. Part of the reason Peppers had so much playing time was Perry's injury.

Prior to Perry's injury, Peppers played between 60% and 71% of the defensive snaps. While Perry was out he played 75%-80%. Now Perry is back and Peppers played 55% at Carolina.

Prior to the injury, Perry played between 40% and 53% of the defensive snaps. Denver was his first game back and he played sparingly (15 snaps.) Now he is fully back and played 57% at Carolina (1 more snap than Peppers.) 🤦

The one who *has* lost playing time is Elliot, who played between 15% and 28% of the defensive snaps prior to Perry's injury, a little more during, and now 0% against Denver and Carolina.

rabidgopher04
Member

9 years ago

#13

The one who *has* lost playing time is Elliot, who played between 15% and 28% of the defensive snaps prior to Perry's injury, a little more during, and now 0% against Denver and Carolina.

Originally Posted by: greengold

Well there you have it! Every time Elliott plays, the Packers win. When he doesn't play, they lose.

I've figured out the secret to the Packers's success. [giddity]

Amazing Bacon Delivery Service! Never be without good bacon again.

musccy
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#14

I often read where forum members say that players and coaches need to be held accountable. How do you propose the way they are held accountable?

Originally Posted by: packerfanoutwest

Lacy benched after fumble and seems to be in the doghouse.

I don't have the snap count, but Ryan appeared to be getting more PT over Palmer.

Minimal Janis sightings in the offense.

No, Mike McCarthy isn't publicly ridiculing players, but it's pretty clear they're holding players accountable.

DakotaT
Select Member

9 years ago

#15

Originally Posted by: musccy

If we resign Lacy, there needs to be a weight clause in his contract. You can't have a skilled player noticeably out of shape like that.

gbguy20
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#16

"Dom Capers: Capers cannot be killed. No matter how many hundreds of yards the Packers allow, Green Bay's oddly coifed coordinator remains in charge. Giving up 491.7 yards and a whopping 28.7 points per game over their past three tilts, the Packers D is responsible for a two-game losing streak that pulled Green Bay out of pole position for an NFC bye. Capers clearly has photos of somebody important doing something ghastly."

- By Marc Sessler
Around the NFL Writer

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000577177/article/heroes-villains-glorious-gabbert-evil-cam

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

DakotaT
Select Member

9 years ago

#17

Originally Posted by: gbguy20

We need to scrap this bullshit 3-4 we've been feebly trying to play and go back to 4-3. Already have the player in place to make the transition, except to the speedy WLB - that guy we have to go draft or buy in free agency.

DarkaneRules
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#18

We tried 4-3 looks at the beginning of last year and it failed. Things got on track late last year and that can happen again. We have youth all across the team especially in the secondary with Shields out and Rollins development has been slowed to injury. Even Damarius has been playing hobbled. We were willing to give them time earlier in the season, but that now that we are losing it would seem our patience has eroded.

Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#19

4-3 with poor execution isn't any better than a 3-4 with poor execution.

I would prefer running an aggressive 4-3 NEXT YEAR. I do think our players do fit the 4-3 better overall.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

nerdmann
Premier Member

9 years ago

#20

4-3 with poor execution isn't any better than a 3-4 with poor execution.

I would prefer running an aggressive 4-3 NEXT YEAR. I do think our players do fit the 4-3 better overall.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins

#jimbates

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (1h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (1h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (1h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (1h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (1h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (1h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (1h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (1h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (2h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (2h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (2h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (2h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (3h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (3h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (3h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (3h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (4h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (4h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (4h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (4h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (4h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (5h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (6h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (6h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (7h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (7h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (7h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (7h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (7h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (7h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (7h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (7h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (7h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (7h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (7h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (7h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (7h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (7h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (7h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (7h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (8h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (8h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (8h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (8h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (8h) : Packers will get in

beast (8h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS