Holy crap PFF said that. We had better cut him and bring back Boykin or Dorsey then.
Personally I think someone puts a little too much faith in PFF. Not that it is a bad site or anything but if I am not mistaken it is a site that evaluates each player in comparison to other players. It doesn't really evaluate his performance on the field. I mean if you have 13 RBs with 1300+ yards and 13 TDs one of them is still going to be #13. Does that mean you don't want him on your team because he was last. In this case it looks to me that they value receptions vs targets fairly heavily and we all know that a target that sails 5 feet over the players head is not on the WR and it is still a target.
Would you seriously rather have Boykin or Dorsey than Adams simply based on his PFF ranking?
The way I look at it he was a rookie who saw a lot of playing time as the #3 WR, had some typical rookie struggles, showed some great flashes and didn't put up spectacular numbers but not bad for a #3 guy behind 2 of the best in the game.
I admit I'm a little apprehensive that our#2 WR only has 1 year of experience but I haven't seen anything that makes me think he can't take the next step or that he won't. Even after seeing the PFF rankings I still haven't seen anything of the sort.
I feel much better now that Jones is back to take up some of the slack but I suppose you will dig up some PFF numbers to try to make me rethink that. Sorry, won't happen.