beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
9 years ago
Beast final 53 man roster

Injured Reserved: WR Nelson / WR Pinkard
Suspension List: DL Jones (one game) / DL Guion (3 games)

Offense
QB (3):Rodgers, Tolzien, Hundley
RB (3): Lacy, Starks, Neal
FB (2): Kuhn, Ripkowski
TE (3): Rodgers, Quarless, Perillo
WR (5): Cobb, Adams, Montgomery, Janis, White
OT (3): Bulaga, Bakhitiari, Barclay
OG (4): Sitton, Lang, Walker, Taylor
OC (2): Linsley, Tretter

RB: I took Neal over Harris and Crockett because I felt like he offered something different as the other four seem like mainly power runners and hopefully one or both will go unclaimed being a possible practice squad pick-up.

FB/TE: I feel like Ripkowski has locked up a ST spot taking it away from the TEs. I don't feel like the back-up TEs have really stepped it up and I feel clueless about who the 3rd TE will be. I went with Perillo as he seems like he's the most ready to go right now... though some of the others had more potential, but they might be able to get one of the to the practice squad to develop more.

WR: I really don't like dropping Abbrederis off this list and could see him make it still as a 6th WR role and see if he could stay healthy a couple weeks in practices making him prove himself before getting any game time. But I just couldn't pull the trigger on the in the projection as he just hasn't proven he can stay healthy yet enough for me to think they'll surely keep him (unless they think he's CLEARLY higher potential than others).

OL: I really dislike keeping that many OGs, even more so because I feel like Barclay is really an OG making it 5 OGs in my mind... but I'm projection them anyways because I think they've played well enough to get noticed and out played guys at other positions.

Defense
NT (2): Raji, Pennel
DT (3): Daniels, Boyd, Gaston
OLB (6): Matthews, Peppers, Perry, Neal, Mulumba, Elliott
ILB (4): Barrington, Palmer, Ryan, Thomas
CB (6): Shields, Hayward, Randall, Rollins, Gunter, Goodson
DS (4): Burnett, Clinton-Dix, Hyde, Richardson

DL: I wanted 6 DL, but with the suspensions of Jones and Guion, I don't think the depth there for it. Of course Jones suspension is only one game so they might get more depth quickly, assuming another DL isn't cut for him.

ILB: I thought about going with a 5th Safety (Banjo) over a 4th ILBers, but I don't think the Packers would do it as they like depth at the positions and because it seemed like Thomas and Bradford were starting to pick it up some. I thought Thomas showed better as of right now... but Bradford has better potential, not sure if he'll make it to his potential or not.

CB: I've heard Goodson might be injured? If so I could see him being IRed and them keeping another DB.

Special Teams
K (1): Crosby
P (1): Masthay
LS (1): Goode

STs: They made it again!

Suspension List Injured Resevre
DL Jones WR Nelson
DL Guion WR Pinkard

UserPostedImage
Smokey
9 years ago

Beast final 53 man roster

Injured Reserved: WR Nelson / WR Pinkard
Suspension List: DL Jones (one game) / DL Guion (3 games)

Offense
QB (3):Rodgers, Tolzien, Hundley
RB (3): Lacy, Starks, Neal
FB (2): Kuhn, Ripkowski
TE (3): Rodgers, Quarless, Perillo
WR (5): Cobb, Adams, Montgomery, Janis, White
OT (3): Bulaga, Bakhitiari, Barclay
OG (4): Sitton, Lang, Walker, Taylor
OC (2): Linsley, Tretter

RB: I took Neal over Harris and Crockett because I felt like he offered something different as the other four seem like mainly power runners and hopefully one or both will go unclaimed being a possible practice squad pick-up.

FB/TE: I feel like Ripkowski has locked up a ST spot taking it away from the TEs. I don't feel like the back-up TEs have really stepped it up and I feel clueless about who the 3rd TE will be. I went with Perillo as he seems like he's the most ready to go right now... though some of the others had more potential, but they might be able to get one of the to the practice squad to develop more.

WR: I really don't like dropping Abbrederis off this list and could see him make it still as a 6th WR role and see if he could stay healthy a couple weeks in practices making him prove himself before getting any game time. But I just couldn't pull the trigger on the in the projection as he just hasn't proven he can stay healthy yet enough for me to think they'll surely keep him (unless they think he's CLEARLY higher potential than others).

OL: I really dislike keeping that many OGs, even more so because I feel like Barclay is really an OG making it 5 OGs in my mind... but I'm projection them anyways because I think they've played well enough to get noticed and out played guys at other positions.

Defense
NT (2): Raji, Pennel
DT (3): Daniels, Boyd, Gaston
OLB (6): Matthews, Peppers, Perry, Neal, Mulumba, Elliott
ILB (4): Barrington, Palmer, Ryan, Thomas
CB (6): Shields, Hayward, Randall, Rollins, Gunter, Goodson
DS (4): Burnett, Clinton-Dix, Hyde, Richardson

DL: I wanted 6 DL, but with the suspensions of Jones and Guion, I don't think the depth there for it. Of course Jones suspension is only one game so they might get more depth quickly, assuming another DL isn't cut for him.

ILB: I thought about going with a 5th Safety (Banjo) over a 4th ILBers, but I don't think the Packers would do it as they like depth at the positions and because it seemed like Thomas and Bradford were starting to pick it up some. I thought Thomas showed better as of right now... but Bradford has better potential, not sure if he'll make it to his potential or not.

CB: I've heard Goodson might be injured? If so I could see him being IRed and them keeping another DB.

Special Teams
K (1): Crosby
P (1): Masthay
LS (1): Goode

STs: They made it again!

Suspension List Injured Resevre
DL Jones WR Nelson
DL Guion WR Pinkard

Originally Posted by: beast 



Why have you started a new thread, when one already exist ! 🤬 😕 😠
UserPostedImage
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
9 years ago

Why have you started a new thread, when one already exist ! 🤬 😕 😠

Originally Posted by: Smokey 



Because that is texaspackerbacker's 53 (at least what I think you're referring too).... and this one is mine.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
9 years ago

Because that is texaspackerbacker's 53 (at least what I think you're referring too).... and this one is mine.

Originally Posted by: beast 



In the past I have asked others to create their own 53 roster projection because unlike picking the season record, it is highly debatable at times. Additionally, if you ever wanna go look back at your project, wouldn't you rather just find the topic you created rather than sifting through a thread with loads of posts?

I do see the value of having all 53 in the same thread too though. I just prefer new thread for each persons 53 so I won't be harping ya.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (1m) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (3m) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (3m) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (4m) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (4m) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (8m) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (8m) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (9m) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (9m) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (11m) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (13m) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (17m) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (19m) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (19m) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (29m) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (34m) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (37m) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (37m) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (39m) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (48m) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (54m) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (58m) : Packers will get in
beast (58m) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (1h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (1h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (2h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (4h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (4h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (4h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (4h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (13h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (14h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (14h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (17h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!
wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.
beast (20-Dec) : As of tonight, 3 way tie for 2nd in Pick'em, that battle is interesting!
beast (20-Dec) : Lions vs Vikings could be the main last game as it could determine division winners or #1 vs #2 seed
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
11m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.