uffda udfa
9 years ago

Not impossible, if Lloyd Christmas had a chance I suppose there is a chance the Packers go with 2 RBs.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



I like it uh lawt.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


sschind
9 years ago

I like it uh lawt.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I was hoping someone would get the reference. You always kind of leave yourself hanging when going for that laugh. Although, to be honest, I'm not sure how much I would respect the opinion of someone who didn't get a Dumb and Dumber reference.😁

Back to the topic, It is possible they go with 2 but IMO its very unlikely. Like others have said it depends on how difficult the others at the tail end make themselves to cut. If Janis and White pour it on and and extra MLB and DB show a lot it could be more than that 3rd RB so he gets cut to allow them the roster spot.

One thing that does bode well for the keep 2 theory is that if #1 and #2 stay healthy #3 is pretty much a forgotten man to 🇲🇲 and in that case then yeah, why not keep someone with more potential at another position.
beast
9 years ago

I'm going to guess if they go 2 RB's they PS squad two of them. Brandon Saine, Michael Hill, etc...those type of guys will always be there.

Heck, I'm not sure Kuhn makes it.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I think it might be very interesting to see a 53 man mock roster from you.

We have talked a lot about 2 RB's. I'm not so sure I'm not okay with just 1 with Kuhn as the FB.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



You've talked about possibility going with one RB and this guy and that guy maybe not making it... it would be interesting to see where the extra guys you kept. Because if you go short on one area, another area gets extra at their position. So I think it'd be interesting where you think their is and isn't depth with a 53 man mock prediction. Of course based on that time and point.


UserPostedImage
beast
9 years ago

One thing that does bode well for the keep 2 theory is that if #1 and #2 stay healthy #3 is pretty much a forgotten man to 🇲🇲

Originally Posted by: sschind 



I'm not sure that's true, if the 3rd RB is talented enough...
yes Harris last year was a forgotten man, but when Lacy got banged up and couldn't finish a guy Kuhn came in and got more looks as the RB than Harris did.

But when the Packers had Franklin there was a lot of chatter that the Packers were setting up a change up scheme all around Franklin's talents (just like Mike McCarthy did with the idea of having Cobb back there).

So if a guy is talented enough and different enough, Mike McCarthy will set something up for them.

That being said, the guys battling for the 3rd RB don't really seem different in anyway other than maybe Neal in the passing game with his route running. But hey, he could be some sort of tweener... better in route running / catching than Lacy/Starks but more physical runner and more likely to go between the tackles than Cobb.

UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
9 years ago

I think it might be very interesting to see a 53 man mock roster from you.



You've talked about possibility going with one RB and this guy and that guy maybe not making it... it would be interesting to see where the extra guys you kept. Because if you go short on one area, another area gets extra at their position. So I think it'd be interesting where you think their is and isn't depth with a 53 man mock prediction. Of course based on that time and point.


Originally Posted by: beast 



I don't think I've ever done a 53. I don't do 7 round mocks either. Exercises in futility...but...maybe, right before final cutdown I'll give it a whirl for the 1st time. I'm sure you'll all be graceful with all the ones I miss. 😁

It's bad biz to keep a position just for the sake of the position. If I've got a 6th or 7th WR I really like I'm keeping him over a 3rd RB I may not think much of, or a 2nd FB. Hope to see Abby before this so I can see what he is.

We have to keep another DL, if not two, because of the suspensions. Unless, Dom comes up with some new "exotic" package. 🤬 Or, he could just use Peppers as a DL for a game. Lots of things to consider.

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
9 years ago

I'm sure you'll all be graceful with all the ones I miss.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I think you got my motivation for wanting to see your 53 man roster prediction all wrong... I've heard you talk about the idea of going with 1 RB, 1 FB and disliking the TEs.... and I'm just wondering (other than the WRs) who does this guy like?

Which has gotten me wondering who'd make your top 53 man roster as of right now...

To me the other mock 53 man roster about being correct is the ones between the last preseason game and the season opener... all the rest are about how you feel at that moment in time and a single preseason game can change your mind... like I had Neal as the 3rd RB, but if he keeps getting outplayed I could see it being someone else.

But I'm just wondering what guys would you keep that you maybe don't like as much but think they're in the top 53 and what guys you like more than others and think they have a real shot at the 53 man roster.

And the logic behind it is more important to me... like we saw earlier...

Rotheram is too talented to make it through waivers, so he makes the roster here.
(and)
It’s more of a case of Crockett being a better fit as a receiving back than Neal

packertalk  wrote:


Some pretty bad logic there... IMO.


It's bad biz to keep a position just for the sake of the position.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I think you have to weight both talent and depth.

We have to keep another DL, if not two, because of the suspensions. Unless, Dom comes up with some new "exotic" package. 🤬 Or, he could just use Peppers as a DL for a game. Lots of things to consider.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Lots of things to consider is why I find it so interesting... it shows what the person considers more and is just interesting in who they like and/or don't like.
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
9 years ago

I think you got my motivation for wanting to see your 53 man roster prediction all wrong... I've heard you talk about the idea of going with 1 RB, 1 FB and disliking the TEs.... and I'm just wondering (other than the WRs) who does this guy like?

Which has gotten me wondering who'd make your top 53 man roster as of right now...

To me the other mock 53 man roster about being correct is the ones between the last preseason game and the season opener... all the rest are about how you feel at that moment in time and a single preseason game can change your mind... like I had Neal as the 3rd RB, but if he keeps getting outplayed I could see it being someone else.

But I'm just wondering what guys would you keep that you maybe don't like as much but think they're in the top 53 and what guys you like more than others and think they have a real shot at the 53 man roster.

And the logic behind it is more important to me... like we saw earlier...

Some pretty bad logic there... IMO.




I think you have to weight both talent and depth.



Lots of things to consider is why I find it so interesting... it shows what the person considers more and is just interesting in who they like and/or don't like.

Originally Posted by: beast 



Oh, I was just commenting on how well "loved" I am here. I find it interesting what others think on that subject. It would be hard for me not to think like they would think though. What I mean is...if I was to do a 53, I would probably do two of them. The one I would want and the one I think they'll select.

BTW, I'm not sure I would only want 2 RB's... as I've said I don't do 53's, so I'm not entirely sure. I would likely use the selection Sunday method for the NCAA BB tourney and just rip the committee for the guys who made it over other more deserving guys in my eyes. That's just some straight shooting.

A couple of more games and weeks for me to mull this over. Should be fun.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
9 years ago

Oh, I was just commenting on how well "loved" I am here.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Yes very loved indeed 😎

What I mean is...if I was to do a 53, I would probably do two of them. The one I would want and the one I think they'll select.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I say go for it... I probably should be doing two like that as well... but I struggle and force myself to combine the two in my head and come up with one list. But normally I do one after each preseason game (though sometimes my projections don't change at all).

and just rip the committee for the guys who made it over other more deserving guys in my eyes.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Well I posted one in another thread. You could just suggest who'd you'd take out and put in their place.

A couple of more games and weeks for me to mull this over. Should be fun.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Well you might want to set it up... so you know who in your mind is a lock, who's clearly out already and the rest who you might want to watch or take notice of (if you're going to do it). Also sometimes the last few positions can be a mental battle of who you want... like I wasn't sure if I wanted, a 4th RB, 4th TE, 4th OG, 4th ILB or 6th DL... I ended up going with the 4th OG because I'm just seem to be hearing a lot of good things about OG Walker including that he could be battling and maybe starting to pass OG Lane as the 3rd. But OGs just aren't a position I normally watch a lot of, and prefer having guys that can play C or OT as well... (though Walker did finish the preseason game at OT)


UserPostedImage
nerdmann
9 years ago

I think you got my motivation for wanting to see your 53 man roster prediction all wrong... I've heard you talk about the idea of going with 1 RB, 1 FB and disliking the TEs.... and I'm just wondering (other than the WRs) who does this guy like?

Which has gotten me wondering who'd make your top 53 man roster as of right now...

To me the other mock 53 man roster about being correct is the ones between the last preseason game and the season opener... all the rest are about how you feel at that moment in time and a single preseason game can change your mind... like I had Neal as the 3rd RB, but if he keeps getting outplayed I could see it being someone else.

But I'm just wondering what guys would you keep that you maybe don't like as much but think they're in the top 53 and what guys you like more than others and think they have a real shot at the 53 man roster.

And the logic behind it is more important to me... like we saw earlier...

Some pretty bad logic there... IMO.




I think you have to weight both talent and depth.



Lots of things to consider is why I find it so interesting... it shows what the person considers more and is just interesting in who they like and/or don't like.

Originally Posted by: beast 



He likes Jeff Janis. And lately, Ty Montgomery.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
beast
9 years ago

He likes Jeff Janis. And lately, Ty Montgomery.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Yeah but two guys doesn't fill out a 53 man roster. .. which is the point of seeing who someone has near, on or over the 53 bubble. There is room for a lot of guys, so it's interesting to see who someone has making it and who doesn't.
UserPostedImage
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (16h) : rude
    Mucky Tundra (16h) : RIP Frank Ragnow
    Mucky Tundra (16h) : @E_Woodyard #Lions HC Dan Campbell says they're gonna put Frank Ragnow down this week. "We've got to be smart," Campbell said.
    bboystyle (25-Sep) : Favre using the pitty card during that hearing for his criminal acts
    Zero2Cool (24-Sep) : Former Packers QB Brett Favre recently announced he was diagnosed with Parkinson's.
    Zero2Cool (24-Sep) : The only QBs this season with 0 turnover-worthy plays according to PFF (minimum 30 dropbacks) Aaron Rodgers Malik Willis Justin Fields
    Mucky Tundra (23-Sep) : @DavidBearmanPFN · 18h Vegas has watched Will Levis for 3 weeks and installed them as a 1-point favorite in Miami next week. Let that sink
    Mucky Tundra (23-Sep) : Martha, they did play much better with Dalton yesterday
    Zero2Cool (23-Sep) : Test results on Sam Darnold’s knee showed a knee bruise and no structural damage. He is not expected to miss any time.
    Martha Careful (23-Sep) : Not with Dalton apparently
    Mucky Tundra (23-Sep) : Not sure what to make of the NFC South so far this season (outside of the Panthers being a dumpster fire)
    Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : of course I say that and then they overturn that play that put them on the 49ers 2 yard line
    Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : *without
    Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : Even with Nacua and Kupp out, Rams looking fiesty on offense
    Martha Careful (22-Sep) : Tim Boyle is playing for the Dolphins
    Martha Careful (22-Sep) : I love seeing Dallas lose
    Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : The Red Rifle is on fire in Las Vegas! 3 TDs in the first half!
    Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : @mattschneidman · 2m The fire alarm is going off inside the Packers locker room here in Nashville.
    Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : Gonna need a drink after looking at my picks for the early games in Pick'em
    Zero2Cool (22-Sep) : James Jones. Y’all must not know, Dr. Mackenzie🤣 he was not going to let Jordan love play today.
    Zero2Cool (22-Sep) : Malik to start. Love inactive. Per report. Let's go!!
    buckeyepackfan (22-Sep) : I think J-10VE will be inactive, a little twist that could be put in is run a wildcat with Wicks at qb. Have him as emergency qb if needed.
    Zero2Cool (21-Sep) : I think that's how it works.
    Zero2Cool (21-Sep) : I'd go 3 QB regardless this game.
    Zero2Cool (21-Sep) : Clifford was elevated, not activated. He doesn't play, it doesn't count.
    hardrocker950 (21-Sep) : If Clifford is active, not likely to see Jordan play this weekend
    Mucky Tundra (21-Sep) : QB Sean Clifford and CB Robert Rochell elevated from the PS for the Titans game
    Zero2Cool (20-Sep) : Love questionable. Morgan is out. Valentine is doubtful
    Martha Careful (20-Sep) : Rodgers and Lazard off to a very strong start
    Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : Josh Jacobs. Limited.
    Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : Can't find anything on Jacobs :(
    wpr (19-Sep) : Do you know if they gave Jacobs an extra day off? I hope so.
    Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : WR Jayden Reed (calf) and G Elgton Jenkins (illness/glute) returned after sitting out Wednesday.
    Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : Packers are in pads and so is Jordan Love. Second straight day of practice for QB1.
    bboystyle (18-Sep) : If Love comes back, we win in a blow out
    Zero2Cool (18-Sep) : Jordan Love just spoke with reporters and said he’s giving himself the week but hopeful to play Sunday against the Titans.
    Zero2Cool (18-Sep) : Practicing is Jordan Love!
    Zero2Cool (18-Sep) : Packers are signing WR Cornelius Johnson to the Practice Squad per sources. Johnson was a 7th round pick this year.
    Zero2Cool (17-Sep) : Packers placed RB MarShawn Lloyd on injured reserve.
    Zero2Cool (16-Sep) : Rams won’t have Cooper Kupp or Puka Nacua when they host the Packers in Week 5.
    Mucky Tundra (16-Sep) : Or is that the Rusty Red Rifle because of his age?
    Mucky Tundra (16-Sep) : The Red Rifle Returns!
    Zero2Cool (16-Sep) : Panthers are benching former No. 1 overall pick Bryce Young and starting veteran Andy Dalton beginning this week.
    Mucky Tundra (16-Sep) : bears still have slim chance here
    Mucky Tundra (16-Sep) : and there's another one!
    Mucky Tundra (16-Sep) : oh crap macbob has the Texans K and he keeps hitting these long FGs
    Mucky Tundra (15-Sep) : Hope the Texans beat the brakes off the Bears
    Zero2Cool (15-Sep) : LaFleur: “I asked Malik why he didn’t throw it on that third down and he told me Josh threw up on the ball.”
    Mucky Tundra (15-Sep) : i was wondering why it was just you, me, beast and macbob by the end
    Zero2Cool (15-Sep) : Yeah it was weird today for some reason
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    29 - 34
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    16 - 10
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    30 - 14
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    26-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    25-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    25-Sep / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    25-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    25-Sep / GameDay Threads / wpr

    24-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    23-Sep / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

    23-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    23-Sep / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    23-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    23-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    23-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    22-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.