Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
9 years ago
I'm assuming that there won't be a trade into the 7th round...so I am going to opine.

What I like:
1. Jake Ryan.
2. Picking two DBs.
3. Picking a hammerhead FB.

What I don't like:
1,2,3,4,5: Not picking players who will push for starting reps this year.
Going in to the draft, GB needed to find people to push the current(or pencilled-in) starters at some of these:
CB, ILB#1, ILB#2, NT, TE, OT.
Now that the draft has happened, they have people who push the current or pencilled-in starters at:
ILB.

Thats it. Barring injuries, the only draftee with a serious shot at starting this year is Jake Ryan. And that primarily because the current ILB roster is either someone who ought not to be starting at ILB because he should be starting at OLB (CM3) or players who are at best serviceable with unproven potential to improve (Barrington) or just unproven (everyone else).

6. Needing a shut-down corner, they pick one DB who is a tweener and a second DB who is a tweener AND has only one year of college football.

7. Not drafting any OL.

8. Having Chicago (Goldman for first), Minnesota (Kendricks for first), and Detroit (Wright for third) all take someone I considered much better for one or more picks GB took in the top 100.

9. It looking like the freaking Vikings tromped Ted in this draft. Throwing out Waynes (who woulda taken a Lawrence Welk trade to get), the Vikings got Kendricks (no more of a reach than Randall in the first), Hunter, Clemmings (available in 2nd and 3rd, higher on board and mighta pushed Bahktiari instead of a project CB/S and at best a fourth WR and a possible PR/KR.), Pruitt (not only substantially more than Backman, but better than that project CB/S and fourth WR picked in 2nd and 3rd), Thompson (would have been competition for needed depth on the OL, something not drafted at all by Ted), andShepherd (who definitely would have been competition for backup on the OL).

10. NOT DRAFTING ANYONE TO PUSH RAJI AND GUION!!!!!!!!!!!!
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Barfarn
9 years ago
I like:
2 high quality outside CBs
1 Much better receiving Josh Cribbs and save Hyde and Cobb from getting injured.
1 Ryan who has as good as a chance as any of those other 5 ILBs to be a good/great ILB and didn't cost us a guy picked 1-3
1 FB named Rip'em'apartkowski Just don't know if cult following fans will yell Riiiiiiiip or skiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
No OLman cant afford the roster spots; next yr we'll get some Wade


Didn't like the trade up for Hundley; 3rd QB must go on PS to preserve valuable roster spot. And if you need to trade up he might not make it if he shows something; woulda liked Jesse James O'Shaughnessy or Tull instead and that effing Belicheck got Daryl Roberts w/ that 7th pick we lost...Grrrrrrrr

9 years ago
I'm excited about Randall, Rollins, and Montgomery.

Rollins' talent after only 1 year of football is off the charts. Randall just seems like a very natural cover corner (regardless of where ASU played him). I think they both have the potential to be very very nice picks.

Montgomery reminds me of Corey Bradford with slightly better hands, and maybe a slightly higher football IQ. He'll thrive with Rodgers throwing him the ball.

I'm less excited about Ryan, even though I was pumped when I saw they drafted a high effort MLB who was a captain of his defense. Watching video, he just seems to lack any kind of burst. The comparisons to Hawk seem pretty spot on.

I haven't watched video of the FB yet, but I'm glad we got one. He and Lacy could punish people.

The DE seems like a project and I don't know if he'll amount to anything. We shall see.
UserPostedImage
DoddPower
9 years ago
I wonder if Ted will considering signing any additional unrestricted free agents now that it won't count against the compensatory pick selection? Isn't Brandon Spikes still available? Would Philly trade Kendricks? I'm sure there others that could push for a roster spot.

Also, I think Ted should take a chance on OT La'ell Collins. If he's cleared of charges, he would be a steal. Worth the risk and would likely be a good backup at worse.
gbguy20
9 years ago

I'm assuming that there won't be a trade into the 7th round...so I am going to opine.

What I like:
1. Jake Ryan.
2. Picking two DBs.
3. Picking a hammerhead FB.

What I don't like:
1,2,3,4,5: Not picking players who will push for starting reps this year.
Going in to the draft, GB needed to find people to push the current(or pencilled-in) starters at some of these:
CB, ILB#1, ILB#2, NT, TE, OT.
Now that the draft has happened, they have people who push the current or pencilled-in starters at:
ILB.

Thats it. Barring injuries, the only draftee with a serious shot at starting this year is Jake Ryan. And that primarily because the current ILB roster is either someone who ought not to be starting at ILB because he should be starting at OLB (CM3) or players who are at best serviceable with unproven potential to improve (Barrington) or just unproven (everyone else).

6. Needing a shut-down corner, they pick one DB who is a tweener and a second DB who is a tweener AND has only one year of college football.

7. Not drafting any OL.

8. Having Chicago (Goldman for first), Minnesota (Kendricks for first), and Detroit (Wright for third) all take someone I considered much better for one or more picks GB took in the top 100.

9. It looking like the freaking Vikings tromped Ted in this draft. Throwing out Waynes (who woulda taken a Lawrence Welk trade to get), the Vikings got Kendricks (no more of a reach than Randall in the first), Hunter, Clemmings (available in 2nd and 3rd, higher on board and mighta pushed Bahktiari instead of a project CB/S and at best a fourth WR and a possible PR/KR.), Pruitt (not only substantially more than Backman, but better than that project CB/S and fourth WR picked in 2nd and 3rd), Thompson (would have been competition for needed depth on the OL, something not drafted at all by Ted), andShepherd (who definitely would have been competition for backup on the OL).

10. NOT DRAFTING ANYONE TO PUSH RAJI AND GUION!!!!!!!!!!!!

Originally Posted by: Wade 



in you dislike section, i disagree with everything but number 10.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
beast
9 years ago

I like not having to worry as much about teams trying to put 4 WRs on the field to simple out match the Packers CBs. While they could still try it, I feel like the CBs the Packers picked up have enough potential to hopefully keep up as they developing and once they develop I think the Packers will be in the best group of DBs they've had since Collins went down (assuming they don't lose Hayward before they develop).

I'm still worried about the Packers front 7 some, but once those DBs develop the Packers seem pretty stacked in the DB department and hopefully Capers with the pass rushers can come up with some thing in the front 7.


And hopefully the Packers offense can get them a lead so they won't be trying to run the ball all game, but having Raji back and having Pennel, Thornton, Robinson and Gaston all with a developmental year under their belts should be better as well to help with a rotation.


I don't like that the depth at TE didn't get much better.

UserPostedImage
yooperfan
9 years ago

I'm assuming that there won't be a trade into the 7th round...so I am going to opine.

What I like:
1. Jake Ryan.
2. Picking two DBs.
3. Picking a hammerhead FB.

What I don't like:
1,2,3,4,5: Not picking players who will push for starting reps this year.
Going in to the draft, GB needed to find people to push the current(or pencilled-in) starters at some of these:
CB, ILB#1, ILB#2, NT, TE, OT.
Now that the draft has happened, they have people who push the current or pencilled-in starters at:
ILB.

Thats it. Barring injuries, the only draftee with a serious shot at starting this year is Jake Ryan. And that primarily because the current ILB roster is either someone who ought not to be starting at ILB because he should be starting at OLB (CM3) or players who are at best serviceable with unproven potential to improve (Barrington) or just unproven (everyone else).

6. Needing a shut-down corner, they pick one DB who is a tweener and a second DB who is a tweener AND has only one year of college football.

7. Not drafting any OL.

8. Having Chicago (Goldman for first), Minnesota (Kendricks for first), and Detroit (Wright for third) all take someone I considered much better for one or more picks GB took in the top 100.

9. It looking like the freaking Vikings tromped Ted in this draft. Throwing out Waynes (who woulda taken a Lawrence Welk trade to get), the Vikings got Kendricks (no more of a reach than Randall in the first), Hunter, Clemmings (available in 2nd and 3rd, higher on board and mighta pushed Bahktiari instead of a project CB/S and at best a fourth WR and a possible PR/KR.), Pruitt (not only substantially more than Backman, but better than that project CB/S and fourth WR picked in 2nd and 3rd), Thompson (would have been competition for needed depth on the OL, something not drafted at all by Ted), andShepherd (who definitely would have been competition for backup on the OL).

10. NOT DRAFTING ANYONE TO PUSH RAJI AND GUION!!!!!!!!!!!!

Originally Posted by: Wade 



Very good analysis!

isocleas2
9 years ago
I truly like all the picks 1-5, and the positions picked in round 6 are ones we needed to address. I know nothing about the late round guys so I won't comment more than that about them.

I think alot of people were so focused on nose tackle and inside linebacker they ignored how much help we needed at CB. What's the saying you can't have enough good cornerbacks? Its even more important than ever and we just lost two key guys at the position.

I get the Jake Ryan comparisons to Hawk, but i think alot of resentment people had for Hawk came because he was a #5 overall pick. If he was drafted late in the 4th round like Ryan was I think people would be more excited about a young A.J. joining the team. I said in the other thread but this is the pick that makes the most sense for the Packers.

I'm also big on the Hundley pick. The Packers will stash him as the #3 on the roster this year, start showcasing him in year 2 and by year 3 we'll finally have a respectable backup qb behind Rodgers. Or a nice trade piece down the road.

Would I have liked the Packers to draft a nose tackle? Yes, but other than that I can find no fault with this draft class.
Rockmolder
9 years ago

I'm assuming that there won't be a trade into the 7th round...so I am going to opine.

What I like:
1. Jake Ryan.
2. Picking two DBs.
3. Picking a hammerhead FB.

What I don't like:
1,2,3,4,5: Not picking players who will push for starting reps this year.
Going in to the draft, GB needed to find people to push the current(or pencilled-in) starters at some of these:
CB, ILB#1, ILB#2, NT, TE, OT.
Now that the draft has happened, they have people who push the current or pencilled-in starters at:
ILB.

Thats it. Barring injuries, the only draftee with a serious shot at starting this year is Jake Ryan. And that primarily because the current ILB roster is either someone who ought not to be starting at ILB because he should be starting at OLB (CM3) or players who are at best serviceable with unproven potential to improve (Barrington) or just unproven (everyone else).

Originally Posted by: Wade 



I feel like you have to make a choice in the draft. After pick 1-15, you're usually out of guys who have both a high ceiling and can start for your team immediatly. There are some exceptions, of course, often having to do with character issues or positions with lesser value.

I don't think you would've gotten a guy who could've pushed for the starting CB role at 30. The best pure CB left was Jalen Strong, a guy who's seen as a project with just 10 starts under his belt in college.

Randall will have a chance to contribute, though, rather than start. I feel like he's the perfect player to move around on defense. He's versatile, athletic, smart and just a football player. He has everything but his size going for him.

What I think is that, in his first season, you can use him as a S/CB hybrid, let him play zone coverages, get him on TEs and spy on running QBs (two positions that have destroyed us in the past) and get the most out of him that way. That'd be one heck of a contribution to the team.

Then with pick 62, you just have to go with potential if you want to keep competing in the future. And we did. I love that pick and feel like we got ourselves our starter for next year. It's a shame that he won't step in right away, but he has a ridiculous skill set, with his speed being the only legitimate question in my eyes.

Then the guy we did get who could be an instant starter has little room to grow. I don't mind that much, with him being a 4th round pick and all, but what you see is what you get. A hard working and studying linebacker, with average athletic ability.

7. Not drafting any OL.



I bet you were hoping for at least 5 o-linemen, knowing you. 😝

8. Having Chicago (Goldman for first), Minnesota (Kendricks for first), and Detroit (Wright for third) all take someone I considered much better for one or more picks GB took in the top 100.



Goldman's an immovable object, but brings very little in terms of a pass rush. Kendricks is a good LBer and a steal at 45, but apart from being more of a need, nothing gave me the impression that he'd be the better pick. Wright would've been good value for us. He's a developmental prospect, but he could be great down the line. We'll just have to see how Montgomery works out.

9. It looking like the freaking Vikings tromped Ted in this draft. Throwing out Waynes (who woulda taken a Lawrence Welk trade to get), the Vikings got Kendricks (no more of a reach than Randall in the first), Hunter, Clemmings (available in 2nd and 3rd, higher on board and mighta pushed Bahktiari instead of a project CB/S and at best a fourth WR and a possible PR/KR.), Pruitt (not only substantially more than Backman, but better than that project CB/S and fourth WR picked in 2nd and 3rd), Thompson (would have been competition for needed depth on the OL, something not drafted at all by Ted), andShepherd (who definitely would have been competition for backup on the OL).



The Vikings had a great draft. So had the Bears. Thing is, after every draft I get the feeling that we botched it just a bit. Ted's like the student who gets a solid B every year, while everyone else is wildly inconsistent, picking up A's and D's, eventually averaging a C.

He never goes for the big names, but follows his own scouts and scouting reports. I can appreciate that. He's proven that they get it right more than other teams.

10. NOT DRAFTING ANYONE TO PUSH RAJI AND GUION!!!!!!!!!!!!



Nose tackles have such ridiculously high positional value, that it's rather hard to get a servicable one later on. Next to that, they should be pushing eachother.If that's not enough, Pennel's still there. Don't know if you could've drafted anyone better than that in the later rounds.

When in doubt, I generally look to what Porky has to say. He seems to be rather happy with the draft, so that's a big comfort.

Lastly... The Hundley pick was pure genius. To get a QB with such physical tools that late in the draft is an absolute steal.
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (3h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (3h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Rude!
beast (7h) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (11h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (13h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (15h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.