Moreso.. there seems to be a resistance to Free Agents coming to Green Bay when an equal opportunity is available elsewhere.
"pack93z" wrote:
Precisely. Which is why this comment
Reality is Ted Thompson is going to have to offer any top tier FA a hell of a lot more money than most any other team out there to make them want to come to Green Bay.
Unless Ted Thompson changes his way, that is not going to happen.
"buckeyepackfan" wrote:
makes no sense to me. It's a conflation of causation that I don't understand. It's misreading a distaste for Green Bay itself as distrust of the Packers organization.
As people have taken great pains to show on this site (ironically, for different motives than mine), that reluctance to come to Green Bay predates Ted Thompson. People now try to pin it on Thompson as a means to discredit him, when in fact it's something systemic within NFL perception of Green Bay as a town (more so, from what I've read, than of the Packers as an organization).
Is it "fair" that players don't want to come to Green Bay because it's "no town for a black man"? No, but it's the reality we have to face. I have no desire to see Packers management sink this team into salary cap hell just to attract a few free agents who don't otherwise want to be here. They make millions of dollars a year -- they can afford a few plane tickets to cities that better suit their "urban" tastes.
Has it ever occurred to anyone that one of the reasons why Ted Thompson was brought to Green Bay may well have been
because his preference for building through the draft was a natural antidote to the longstanding resistance from NFL players to coming to Green Bay?
P.S. I never labeled anyone a "hater." I merely said his carping is monotonous, because it's so predictable.
/thread hijack
P.P.S. I concur with
warhawk's analysis almost point for point.