Raiders sign Richardson to offer sheet· Page 3

greengold
Member

9 years ago

#21

What a savant you are. Is that half a word?

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#22

Just read another article in news feed.

Details of the contract is putting me on the fence.

All but $200,000.00
Of the money is guaranteed.

Ted may balk at matching such a contract.

With Burnette and HHCD safely pencilled in as the starters and Hydes ability to move around, Richardson may very well be on his way out.

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

yooperfan
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#23

It seems to me that he is a big guy and a hard hitter but he has never developed.
IMO he is not an important piece to the puzzle and Ted should let him move on.

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#24

Sean Richardson is brutal in coverage (kind of important for a S). Is a guy blessed with all the measurables but isn't a true football player. He was with Casey Hayward at Vandy...I watched YouTube clips of him after we got him...it was said the guy had no instincts and the clips they showed of him sure proved that. He just looked lost and took some of the worst angles you possibly could on a football field. Not sure why the Raiders are interested. Good bye.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

gbguy20
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#25

I'll assume that your information is correct, even though you've not stated from where you got it. How many were with the practice squad ? How many will never make it to be a starter ?

Now I see the Packers loosing ILB's and CB's , and magically determine that those positions will need to be filled. :signduh:

Before Lacey, I saw that The Packers needed a Running Back, when ALL cried that the passing attack was all that was needed .

Last off-season , I foresaw the greatest need at the safety position. Then appears Ha Ha Clinton-Dix to the rescue. He will be more of a presence this season , following his rookie season.

I see the obvious and have the courage to speak the truth. That later I find articles penned by professionals that back up my case is just support for what I've been saying all along.

I say that the Packers Offense is in good shape for 2015, yet the Defense needs personal at the CB and ILB positions. In addition, faster/stronger Defensive non-starters will find Special Teams ready to welcome them to the squad.

Originally Posted by: Smokey

I'm almost ready to declare you more ridiculous than uffda. YOU saw that we needed a safety last offseason????!!! It's not as if the entire fan base knew that long before then. YOU saw we needed a running back 2 offseasons ago?! Again, the entire fan base was looking for a more balanced offensive attack. Let me get one thing straight for you, the experts are not waiting for you to tell them what the needs of the Packers are, before they write articles.

Also, while I am at it, the word is spelled offenSe and losing only has one o. As long as you are calling yourself knowledgeable, you might as well be spelling common words correctly.

Wherever you and Uffda came from, I am starting to think he wasn't the only troll hiding under that bridge.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

9 years ago

#26

Come on folks, we are all a little ridiculous, lets keep the poo flinging down a tad, mmmkay, thanks. 🙂

Focus more on the content, than the individual supplying the content.

I'll assume that your information is correct, even though you've not stated from where you got it

Originally Posted by: Smokey

www.Packers.com but who can trust them? :angel11:

Last off-season , I foresaw the greatest need at the safety position. Then appears Ha Ha Clinton-Dix to the rescue. He will be more of a presence this season , following his rookie season.

Originally Posted by: Smokey

You, Stevie Wonder and Ray Charles all saw the same thing.

I see the obvious and have the courage to speak the truth. That later I find articles penned by professionals that back up my case is just support for what I've been saying all along.

Originally Posted by: Smokey

I would encourage you to have the courage to ink up some exclusive articles for PackersHome and put them on the front page. I would truly appreciate the time and effort. I try to do this from time to time, but I think most are tired of my words. lol

sschind
Senior Member

9 years ago

#27

Come on folks, we are all a little ridiculous, lets keep the poo flinging down a tad, mmmkay, thanks. 🙂

Focus more on the content, than the individual supplying the content.

www.Packers.com but who can trust them? :angel11:

You, Stevie Wonder and Ray Charles all saw the same thing.

I would encourage you to have the courage to ink up some exclusive articles for PackersHome and put them on the front page. I would truly appreciate the time and effort. I try to do this from time to time, but I think most are tired of my words. lol

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Um... Ray is dead. Maybe Stevie but a dead guy? I'm willing to bet that even Smokey could see more than a dead guy. I wouldn't bet much but I would bet.

FLORIDA PACKER88
Member

9 years ago

#28

I like him on Special teams and as an occasional in box run support guy but I don't know that he has the coverage ability to be anything more than a part time backup. For that kind of money I think we should let him walk.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

9 years ago

#29

Packers gave him a $1.5 million restricted free agent qualifying offer.

Raiders signed him to a one year offer of a $1.35 million signing bonus, a fully guaranteed $1 million base salary and a $200,000 roster bonus payable at the start of training camp – meaning that essentially the deal is fully guaranteed, per Tom Silverstein and Jason Wilde.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

9 years ago

#30

With Shields and Hayward, why would Ted Thompson want to spend money retaining a player with experience at the position ?

Ok, be upset with me, but I read the off the wall post and just can't help myself sometimes. Do some of you actually read and believe what your post ?

On the other hand, some post are quite intelligent and show focused thought .

Every off-season that I've been in online forums (4 years) , I've been precisely correct about The Packers needs. Also the "experts" back me up in their articles.

As a result it is not easy to read post that sound as if they were written by High School Dropouts on Drugs . I don't expect people to always agree with me, but at least explain the logic behind some of the completely wrong ideas that get posted .

Originally Posted by: Smokey

I think the ADULT way to reply would be better then attacking someone. Just a thought.....maybe the person posting might not be as "intellegent" or "knowledgeable" as you (or as much as you THINK you are). So, do you think insulting their comments is the right thing to do? You did that to me when you first came here. It sure didn't start me off with a high opinion of you.
It would be better to think about what you are going to say, put yourself in the position of the person you are about to reply about, and then think of how it might hurt them.
You could post what you think in a much more thoughtful way, and still make some good points.
Try it some time. It may make what you post not make you look like a jack ass.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Martha Careful (56m) : I hope it is colder than a well-diggers ass on Thanksgiving night.

Zero2Cool (8h) : doubt he wants to face the speedsters

beast (9h) : Dolphins offense can be explosive... I wonder if we'll have Alexander back

Zero2Cool (10h) : No Doubs could be issue Thursday

Mucky Tundra (15h) : Bears. Santos. Blocked FG

Zero2Cool (24-Nov) : Bears. Vikings. OT

Mucky Tundra (24-Nov) : Thems the breaks I guess

Mucky Tundra (24-Nov) : Two players out and Williams had an injury designation this week but Oladapo is a healthy scratch

Zero2Cool (24-Nov) : Packers inactives vs 49ers: • CB Jaire Alexander • S Kitan Oladapo • LB Edgerrin Cooper • OL Jacob Monk

TheKanataThrilla (24-Nov) : Aaron Jones with a costly red zone fumble

Zero2Cool (24-Nov) : When we trade Malik for a 1st rounder, we'll need a new QB2.

packerfanoutwest (23-Nov) : Report: Aaron Rodgers wants to play in 2025, but not for the Jets

beast (23-Nov) : That's what I told the Police officer about my speed when he pulled me over

packerfanoutwest (23-Nov) : NFL told Bears that Packers’ blocked field goal was legal

packerfanoutwest (22-Nov) : 49ers are underdogs at Packers, ending streak of 36 straight games as favorites

Zero2Cool (22-Nov) : 49ers might be down their QB, DL, TE and LT?

packerfanoutwest (22-Nov) : Jaire Alexander says he has a torn PCL

Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : Even with the context it's ... what?

Mucky Tundra (20-Nov) : Matt LaFleur without context: “I don’t wanna pat you on the butt and you poop in my hand.”

beast (20-Nov) : We brought in a former Packers OL coach to help evaluate OL as a scout

beast (20-Nov) : Jets have been pretty good at picking DL

Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : He landed good players thanks to high draft slot. He isn't good.

Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : He can shove his knowledge up his ass. He knows nothing.

beast (20-Nov) : More knowledge, just like bring in the Jets head coach

Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : What? Why? Huh?

beast (19-Nov) : I wonder if the Packers might to try to bring Douglas in through Milt Hendrickson/Ravens connections

Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : The Jets fired Joe Douglas, per sources

packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : Jets are a mess......

Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Pretty sure Jets fired their scouting staff and just pluck former Packers.

Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Jets sign Anders Carlson to their 53.

Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : When you cycle the weeks, the total over remains for season. But you get your W/L for that selected week. Confusing.

packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the total and percentage are the same as the previous weeks

packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the totals are accurate..nrvrtmind

Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : I don't follow what you are saying. The totals are not the same as last week.

packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : ok so then wht are the totals the same as last week?

Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : NFL Pick'em is auto updated when NFL Scores tab is clicked

Martha Careful (19-Nov) : The offense was OK. Let's not forget the Bear defense is very very good.

packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : Who updates the leaderboard on NFLPickem?

beast (19-Nov) : Has the Packers offense been worse since the former Jets coach joined the Packers?

Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Offense gets his ass in gear, this could be good.

Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Backup QB helped with three wins. Special Teams contributed to three wins.

bboystyle (18-Nov) : Lions played outside thats why. They scored 16 and 17 in the only 2 outside games this year

Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : The rest of the NFL is catching up to Packers ... kicking is an issue throughout league

packerfanoutwest (18-Nov) : Packers DL Kenny Clark: We knew 'we were going to block' Bears' game-winning field goal attempt

Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : Lions seem to be throttling everyone, but only (only) got 24 lol maybe the rain is why

Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : Packers vs Lions game doesn't seem so bad.

beast (18-Nov) : Dennis Green "They are what we thought they were, and we let them off the hook!"

Martha Careful (17-Nov) : comment of the day Z2Cool "Bears better than we want to admit. Packers worse than we think. It's facts."

Mucky Tundra (17-Nov) : my worst case scenario: Bears fix their oline and get a coach like Johnson from the Lions and his scheme

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS