Raiders sign Richardson to offer sheet· Page 3

greengold
Member

9 years ago

#21

What a savant you are. Is that half a word?

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#22

Just read another article in news feed.

Details of the contract is putting me on the fence.

All but $200,000.00
Of the money is guaranteed.

Ted may balk at matching such a contract.

With Burnette and HHCD safely pencilled in as the starters and Hydes ability to move around, Richardson may very well be on his way out.

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

yooperfan
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#23

It seems to me that he is a big guy and a hard hitter but he has never developed.
IMO he is not an important piece to the puzzle and Ted should let him move on.

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#24

Sean Richardson is brutal in coverage (kind of important for a S). Is a guy blessed with all the measurables but isn't a true football player. He was with Casey Hayward at Vandy...I watched YouTube clips of him after we got him...it was said the guy had no instincts and the clips they showed of him sure proved that. He just looked lost and took some of the worst angles you possibly could on a football field. Not sure why the Raiders are interested. Good bye.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

gbguy20
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#25

I'll assume that your information is correct, even though you've not stated from where you got it. How many were with the practice squad ? How many will never make it to be a starter ?

Now I see the Packers loosing ILB's and CB's , and magically determine that those positions will need to be filled. :signduh:

Before Lacey, I saw that The Packers needed a Running Back, when ALL cried that the passing attack was all that was needed .

Last off-season , I foresaw the greatest need at the safety position. Then appears Ha Ha Clinton-Dix to the rescue. He will be more of a presence this season , following his rookie season.

I see the obvious and have the courage to speak the truth. That later I find articles penned by professionals that back up my case is just support for what I've been saying all along.

I say that the Packers Offense is in good shape for 2015, yet the Defense needs personal at the CB and ILB positions. In addition, faster/stronger Defensive non-starters will find Special Teams ready to welcome them to the squad.

Originally Posted by: Smokey

I'm almost ready to declare you more ridiculous than uffda. YOU saw that we needed a safety last offseason????!!! It's not as if the entire fan base knew that long before then. YOU saw we needed a running back 2 offseasons ago?! Again, the entire fan base was looking for a more balanced offensive attack. Let me get one thing straight for you, the experts are not waiting for you to tell them what the needs of the Packers are, before they write articles.

Also, while I am at it, the word is spelled offenSe and losing only has one o. As long as you are calling yourself knowledgeable, you might as well be spelling common words correctly.

Wherever you and Uffda came from, I am starting to think he wasn't the only troll hiding under that bridge.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

9 years ago

#26

Come on folks, we are all a little ridiculous, lets keep the poo flinging down a tad, mmmkay, thanks. 🙂

Focus more on the content, than the individual supplying the content.

I'll assume that your information is correct, even though you've not stated from where you got it

Originally Posted by: Smokey

www.Packers.com but who can trust them? :angel11:

Last off-season , I foresaw the greatest need at the safety position. Then appears Ha Ha Clinton-Dix to the rescue. He will be more of a presence this season , following his rookie season.

Originally Posted by: Smokey

You, Stevie Wonder and Ray Charles all saw the same thing.

I see the obvious and have the courage to speak the truth. That later I find articles penned by professionals that back up my case is just support for what I've been saying all along.

Originally Posted by: Smokey

I would encourage you to have the courage to ink up some exclusive articles for PackersHome and put them on the front page. I would truly appreciate the time and effort. I try to do this from time to time, but I think most are tired of my words. lol

sschind
Senior Member

9 years ago

#27

Come on folks, we are all a little ridiculous, lets keep the poo flinging down a tad, mmmkay, thanks. 🙂

Focus more on the content, than the individual supplying the content.

www.Packers.com but who can trust them? :angel11:

You, Stevie Wonder and Ray Charles all saw the same thing.

I would encourage you to have the courage to ink up some exclusive articles for PackersHome and put them on the front page. I would truly appreciate the time and effort. I try to do this from time to time, but I think most are tired of my words. lol

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Um... Ray is dead. Maybe Stevie but a dead guy? I'm willing to bet that even Smokey could see more than a dead guy. I wouldn't bet much but I would bet.

FLORIDA PACKER88
Member

9 years ago

#28

I like him on Special teams and as an occasional in box run support guy but I don't know that he has the coverage ability to be anything more than a part time backup. For that kind of money I think we should let him walk.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

9 years ago

#29

Packers gave him a $1.5 million restricted free agent qualifying offer.

Raiders signed him to a one year offer of a $1.35 million signing bonus, a fully guaranteed $1 million base salary and a $200,000 roster bonus payable at the start of training camp – meaning that essentially the deal is fully guaranteed, per Tom Silverstein and Jason Wilde.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

9 years ago

#30

With Shields and Hayward, why would Ted Thompson want to spend money retaining a player with experience at the position ?

Ok, be upset with me, but I read the off the wall post and just can't help myself sometimes. Do some of you actually read and believe what your post ?

On the other hand, some post are quite intelligent and show focused thought .

Every off-season that I've been in online forums (4 years) , I've been precisely correct about The Packers needs. Also the "experts" back me up in their articles.

As a result it is not easy to read post that sound as if they were written by High School Dropouts on Drugs . I don't expect people to always agree with me, but at least explain the logic behind some of the completely wrong ideas that get posted .

Originally Posted by: Smokey

I think the ADULT way to reply would be better then attacking someone. Just a thought.....maybe the person posting might not be as "intellegent" or "knowledgeable" as you (or as much as you THINK you are). So, do you think insulting their comments is the right thing to do? You did that to me when you first came here. It sure didn't start me off with a high opinion of you.
It would be better to think about what you are going to say, put yourself in the position of the person you are about to reply about, and then think of how it might hurt them.
You could post what you think in a much more thoughtful way, and still make some good points.
Try it some time. It may make what you post not make you look like a jack ass.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Notre Lame=Notre Dame, Luckeyes=Ohio State, Pedo St=Penn St

Zero2Cool (7h) : ... It clearly was not what we were supposed to be in, certainly."

Zero2Cool (7h) : Hafley says 3rd and 11 call there was a miscommunication.

Zero2Cool (8h) : The only team I know is Texas from that. Who are the other three?

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Notre Lame vs Pedo St tonight and the Luckeyes vs Texas tomorrow

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Stud

Zero2Cool (11h) : E. Cooper. Rookie of Month. Defense.

Mucky Tundra (8-Jan) : @AaronNagler · 2m Both Jordan Love and Malik Willis were Limited participants at Packers practice today.

Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Johnson didn't make it until 2020. Ring 2023. 🤷 Personally, he should have been in years prior to Hall.

Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : HUMP DAY

beast (8-Jan) : Guys that have a good shot at making the NFL Hall of Fame usually get into their teams pretty fast

beast (8-Jan) : Yeah, but is Kampman and the others in the NFL Hall of Fame?

Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Johnson was Hall of Fame, 2020. Should haev been in Ring a year later, not three years.

Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : I could be wrong there though

Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Guys like Kampman, Tim Harris, Al Harris, etc all over 15 years. Hall of Fame is 5 year wait

Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : I guess I see players in Packers Hall come way later

beast (8-Jan) : Yeah, usually teams hall of fames are a much lower bar than the NFL

Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : is it uncommon for Hall before Ring?

Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : S Xavier McKinney named first-team All-Pro by NFLPA

beast (8-Jan) : I missed it, sorry, but he got into the NFL Hall of Fame years before that

Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Jones took his sweet ole time!

Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Yeah, he's in the ring of honor, just saw video and his name is up there

Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Didn't they have a thing in 2023 for Jimmy's ring of honor? I swear I saw it

beast (8-Jan) : Though if they're legitimately trying to re-sign MM, then it makes sense.

beast (8-Jan) : Jerry Jones still hasn't put Jimmy Johnson in the Ring of Honor, but he's in the NFL's Hall of Fame, Jones is petty

Mucky Tundra (8-Jan) : Unless the Cowboys are planning an extension, seems kinda petty

beast (8-Jan) : Cowboys denied Bears request

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : From what I'm reading, MM is under contract through the 14th of January; after that he's free game

Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : McCarthy let go or not extended??

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Chicago Bears have asked the Dallas Cowboys permission to interview Mike McCarthy for head coaching vacancy

Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : The winners page that is

Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol

beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.

beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3

Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats beast on 2024 !

Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)

Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : That might be it for the Vikings

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact

Martha Careful (6-Jan) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy

Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Where was this Darnold vs GB?

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : BALL DON'T LIE

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : how was that not a safety? Goff throws it at an offensive lineman

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero, I thought that was a given! ;)

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24