Raiders sign Richardson to offer sheet· Page 3

greengold
Member

10 years ago

#21

What a savant you are. Is that half a word?

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#22

Just read another article in news feed.

Details of the contract is putting me on the fence.

All but $200,000.00
Of the money is guaranteed.

Ted may balk at matching such a contract.

With Burnette and HHCD safely pencilled in as the starters and Hydes ability to move around, Richardson may very well be on his way out.

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

yooperfan
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#23

It seems to me that he is a big guy and a hard hitter but he has never developed.
IMO he is not an important piece to the puzzle and Ted should let him move on.

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#24

Sean Richardson is brutal in coverage (kind of important for a S). Is a guy blessed with all the measurables but isn't a true football player. He was with Casey Hayward at Vandy...I watched YouTube clips of him after we got him...it was said the guy had no instincts and the clips they showed of him sure proved that. He just looked lost and took some of the worst angles you possibly could on a football field. Not sure why the Raiders are interested. Good bye.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

gbguy20
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#25

I'll assume that your information is correct, even though you've not stated from where you got it. How many were with the practice squad ? How many will never make it to be a starter ?

Now I see the Packers loosing ILB's and CB's , and magically determine that those positions will need to be filled. :signduh:

Before Lacey, I saw that The Packers needed a Running Back, when ALL cried that the passing attack was all that was needed .

Last off-season , I foresaw the greatest need at the safety position. Then appears Ha Ha Clinton-Dix to the rescue. He will be more of a presence this season , following his rookie season.

I see the obvious and have the courage to speak the truth. That later I find articles penned by professionals that back up my case is just support for what I've been saying all along.

I say that the Packers Offense is in good shape for 2015, yet the Defense needs personal at the CB and ILB positions. In addition, faster/stronger Defensive non-starters will find Special Teams ready to welcome them to the squad.

Originally Posted by: Smokey

I'm almost ready to declare you more ridiculous than uffda. YOU saw that we needed a safety last offseason????!!! It's not as if the entire fan base knew that long before then. YOU saw we needed a running back 2 offseasons ago?! Again, the entire fan base was looking for a more balanced offensive attack. Let me get one thing straight for you, the experts are not waiting for you to tell them what the needs of the Packers are, before they write articles.

Also, while I am at it, the word is spelled offenSe and losing only has one o. As long as you are calling yourself knowledgeable, you might as well be spelling common words correctly.

Wherever you and Uffda came from, I am starting to think he wasn't the only troll hiding under that bridge.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

#26

Come on folks, we are all a little ridiculous, lets keep the poo flinging down a tad, mmmkay, thanks. 🙂

Focus more on the content, than the individual supplying the content.

I'll assume that your information is correct, even though you've not stated from where you got it

Originally Posted by: Smokey

www.Packers.com but who can trust them? :angel11:

Last off-season , I foresaw the greatest need at the safety position. Then appears Ha Ha Clinton-Dix to the rescue. He will be more of a presence this season , following his rookie season.

Originally Posted by: Smokey

You, Stevie Wonder and Ray Charles all saw the same thing.

I see the obvious and have the courage to speak the truth. That later I find articles penned by professionals that back up my case is just support for what I've been saying all along.

Originally Posted by: Smokey

I would encourage you to have the courage to ink up some exclusive articles for PackersHome and put them on the front page. I would truly appreciate the time and effort. I try to do this from time to time, but I think most are tired of my words. lol

sschind
Senior Member

10 years ago

#27

Come on folks, we are all a little ridiculous, lets keep the poo flinging down a tad, mmmkay, thanks. 🙂

Focus more on the content, than the individual supplying the content.

www.Packers.com but who can trust them? :angel11:

You, Stevie Wonder and Ray Charles all saw the same thing.

I would encourage you to have the courage to ink up some exclusive articles for PackersHome and put them on the front page. I would truly appreciate the time and effort. I try to do this from time to time, but I think most are tired of my words. lol

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Um... Ray is dead. Maybe Stevie but a dead guy? I'm willing to bet that even Smokey could see more than a dead guy. I wouldn't bet much but I would bet.

FLORIDA PACKER88
Member

10 years ago

#28

I like him on Special teams and as an occasional in box run support guy but I don't know that he has the coverage ability to be anything more than a part time backup. For that kind of money I think we should let him walk.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

#29

Packers gave him a $1.5 million restricted free agent qualifying offer.

Raiders signed him to a one year offer of a $1.35 million signing bonus, a fully guaranteed $1 million base salary and a $200,000 roster bonus payable at the start of training camp – meaning that essentially the deal is fully guaranteed, per Tom Silverstein and Jason Wilde.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

10 years ago

#30

With Shields and Hayward, why would Ted Thompson want to spend money retaining a player with experience at the position ?

Ok, be upset with me, but I read the off the wall post and just can't help myself sometimes. Do some of you actually read and believe what your post ?

On the other hand, some post are quite intelligent and show focused thought .

Every off-season that I've been in online forums (4 years) , I've been precisely correct about The Packers needs. Also the "experts" back me up in their articles.

As a result it is not easy to read post that sound as if they were written by High School Dropouts on Drugs . I don't expect people to always agree with me, but at least explain the logic behind some of the completely wrong ideas that get posted .

Originally Posted by: Smokey

I think the ADULT way to reply would be better then attacking someone. Just a thought.....maybe the person posting might not be as "intellegent" or "knowledgeable" as you (or as much as you THINK you are). So, do you think insulting their comments is the right thing to do? You did that to me when you first came here. It sure didn't start me off with a high opinion of you.
It would be better to think about what you are going to say, put yourself in the position of the person you are about to reply about, and then think of how it might hurt them.
You could post what you think in a much more thoughtful way, and still make some good points.
Try it some time. It may make what you post not make you look like a jack ass.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

dfosterf (29m) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (30m) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (1h) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (1h) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (1h) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (1h) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (1h) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (1h) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (1h) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (1h) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (1h) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (2h) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (2h) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (2h) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (2h) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (4h) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (4h) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (4h) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (19h) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb

wpr (9-Apr) : yay

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'

Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?

Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : uh oh

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22