Mucky Tundra
10 years ago

INDIANAPOLIS — Mike McCarthy wants Julius Peppers back in 2015. In fact, the Green Bay Packers head coach — clearly the salary cap isn't under his purview — doesn't understand why anyone would even doubt that the veteran outside linebacker will be back.

"I must be the only one who doesn't understand why that question keeps coming up," McCarthy said Thursday at the annual NFL Scouting Combine at Lucas Oil Stadium when asked during a podium session with reporters whether he envisions Peppers coming back. "Yeah, I definitely believe Julius Peppers is going to be here. He was very comfortable. He had a great year. He made an impact both on the field and in the locker room. It was unique to get to know Julius Peppers through the process of once he signed as a free agent. I think he looks great in green and gold."

Peppers, who turned 35 the day of the NFC Championship Game, signed a three-year, $26 million deal last March that paid him a guaranteed $7.5 million signing bonus and $1 million base salary for 2014. That made his 2014 salary-cap number only $3.5 million, but his cap number jumps to $12 million in 2015 and $10.5 million in 2016. His 2015 base salary is scheduled to be $8.5 million, and his 2016 base salary is $7 million.

Peppers played in all 16 regular-season games, playing 825 snaps and registering 45 tackles, seven sacks and 11 pass breakups. He also had two interceptions — both of which he returned for touchdowns, against Minnesota and Philadelphia — and forced a team-best four fumbles. He recovered three fumbles, also most on the team.

While the Packers' official team stats had Peppers for 17 quarterback hits, the advanced statistics site Pro Football Focus credited him with 11 quarterback hits and 31 quarterback hurries — most on the team — and he and Clay Matthews tied for the team lead in combined sacks-hits-hurries.

Despite that production, one would think a $12 million cap number would be problematic, but apparently McCarthy doesn't see it that way.

Earlier in the day, general manager Ted Thompson avoided a question about Peppers return — "We try to bring all of our players back," he said — and said the team would consider signing a player like Peppers again this spring if the right situation arose.

"We like to make our team better. We're going to do whatever we can to make our team better," Thompson said. "Hopefully, we can do that in the draft class with these young men; hopefully, we can do it keeping our own guys; hopefully, we can do it picking up a veteran or two."

Late in the season, Peppers made it clear that he wasn't planning on retiring  even if the Packers won the Super Bowl, which of course they did not do. Asked at that time whether he thought he'd be back in Green Bay, he replied, "As far as I know, it's going to be here. But I don't know anything different." Asked if he expected the Packers to ask him to restructure his deal, Peppers' answer was, "Maybe. That hasn't even been on my radar, to be honest with you. It's not really important right now, so I haven't really thought about it."

Jason Wilde  wrote:


Under Construction!
warhawk
10 years ago
This will be interesting to see what happens. Peppers did have a good year and helped the team and didn't cost much because the Bears ate a lot of it.
However, from a pure business standpoint the reality of it is he will not get $12 million from anybody and probably not with another team that has a real shot at a ring. He's also at that age where the question is can he do it again this year and produce like he did in 2014?
The other side of that is that as it stands the NT position is iffy and if the defense is going to improve replacing both Hawk and Jones is a must so the timing of moving on from Peppers is not good. Certainly not from the standpoint of veteran presence on the field.

This is a classic example of why dipping into FA is risky. It doesn't take much to be in a position where a team loses better players and more so in a case like this where you have to wonder if he can keep it going. Fortunately it looks like the Packers can retain most of the guys they want to keep this year but it sure doesn't take many FA deals like this to get your butt in a crack.

"The train is leaving the station."
nerdmann
10 years ago

This will be interesting to see what happens. Peppers did have a good year and helped the team and didn't cost much because the Bears ate a lot of it.
However, from a pure business standpoint the reality of it is he will not get $12 million from anybody and probably not with another team that has a real shot at a ring. He's also at that age where the question is can he do it again this year and produce like he did in 2014?
The other side of that is that as it stands the NT position is iffy and if the defense is going to improve replacing both Hawk and Jones is a must so the timing of moving on from Peppers is not good. Certainly not from the standpoint of veteran presence on the field.

This is a classic example of why dipping into FA is risky. It doesn't take much to be in a position where a team loses better players and more so in a case like this where you have to wonder if he can keep it going. Fortunately it looks like the Packers can retain most of the guys they want to keep this year but it sure doesn't take many FA deals like this to get your butt in a crack.

Originally Posted by: warhawk 



Bring him back at a reduced salary AND a reduced pitch count. Keep him fresh and healthy for the playoff run.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Yerko
10 years ago

This will be interesting to see what happens. Peppers did have a good year and helped the team and didn't cost much because the Bears ate a lot of it.
However, from a pure business standpoint the reality of it is he will not get $12 million from anybody and probably not with another team that has a real shot at a ring. He's also at that age where the question is can he do it again this year and produce like he did in 2014?
The other side of that is that as it stands the NT position is iffy and if the defense is going to improve replacing both Hawk and Jones is a must so the timing of moving on from Peppers is not good. Certainly not from the standpoint of veteran presence on the field.

This is a classic example of why dipping into FA is risky. It doesn't take much to be in a position where a team loses better players and more so in a case like this where you have to wonder if he can keep it going. Fortunately it looks like the Packers can retain most of the guys they want to keep this year but it sure doesn't take many FA deals like this to get your butt in a crack.

Originally Posted by: warhawk 



While Peppers did make the defense better, it would be tough to see him getting paid $8.5 million for limited snaps. While it worked last season, there is no telling if he will be able to have the same successes he had or if his snap count will be even more limited. Add to this, Nick Perry's play has been getting better.

On the other hand, Packers just cut Brad Jones which freed up another $3.5 million. I think that will currently put the Packers around $28 million in cap space. So, if the Packers can afford him at $8.5 million...why does it matter?
UserPostedImage
musccy
10 years ago

While Peppers did make the defense better, it would be tough to see him getting paid $8.5 million for limited snaps. While it worked last season, there is no telling if he will be able to have the same successes he had or if his snap count will be even more limited. Add to this, Nick Perry's play has been getting better.

On the other hand, Packers just cut Brad Jones which freed up another $3.5 million. I think that will currently put the Packers around $28 million in cap space. So, if the Packers can afford him at $8.5 million...why does it matter?

Originally Posted by: Yerko 



Could be ~ 33 million with a new projected salary cap 143 mil salary cap 2015? 


shield4life
10 years ago
They can easily swallow Peppers contract this season. I would be surprised, shocked actually to not see him in GB next year. He improved the defense that's all I can say!
Glad To Be A Packers Fan.
Fan Shout
dfosterf (14h) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
Zero2Cool (16h) : My cousin, yes.
dfosterf (17h) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
dfosterf (14-Jun) : TWO magnificent strikes for touchdowns. Lose the pennstate semigeezer non nfl backup
dfosterf (14-Jun) : There was minicamp Thursday. My man Taylor Engersma threw
dfosterf (11-Jun) : There will be a mini camp practice Thursday.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : He's been sporting a ring for a while now. It's probably Madonna.
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : We only do the tea before whoopee, it relaxes me.
wpr (10-Jun) : That's awesome Martha.
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : How's the ayahuasca tea he makes, Martha?
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : Turns out he like older women
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : I wasn't supposed to say anything, but yes the word is out and we are happy 😂😂😂
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : I might be late on this but Aaron Rodgers is now married
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

14-Jun / Around The NFL / beast

14-Jun / Community Welcome! / dfosterf

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.