Dulak
9 years ago
wasnt sure where to put this but ... why wasnt matthews in the last series (the one that seattle got their last TD of regular time in). Lynch had a few good runs and so did wilson - I thought matthews new position helps to counter this stuff.

packerfanoutwest
9 years ago
he had to go work on his hair
nerdmann
9 years ago

As a cowboy coming late to this rodeo, I would have to disagree. Coach Mac doesn't have to prove anything to anybody.

If you re-watch what transpired during the final few minutes of yesterday's game it was just one of those moments where everything falls into place against an entity where the eventual outcome is inevitable. Call it karma, call it kismet, fate, or momentum.

Green Bay is solid, they'll be back.

And McCarthy is a good coach[rockon]

Originally Posted by: polargrizz 



It's a repeating pattern with this staff. Go back and watch the Atlanta game from earlier this year. Skip to the 2nd half and key on Julio Jones.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
PackFanWithTwins
9 years ago

As a cowboy coming late to this rodeo, I would have to disagree. Coach Mac doesn't have to prove anything to anybody.

If you re-watch what transpired during the final few minutes of yesterday's game it was just one of those moments where everything falls into place against an entity where the eventual outcome is inevitable. Call it karma, call it kismet, fate, or momentum.

Green Bay is solid, they'll be back.

And McCarthy is a good coach[rockon]

Originally Posted by: polargrizz 



Part of the last few minutes was his ultra conservative play calling that resulted in run, run, pass, punt, run, run, run, punt for about 2:30 of clock burned. Calls plays even a little more aggressive and a first down puts us in the SB.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
dhazer
9 years ago

Part of the last few minutes was his ultra conservative play calling that resulted in run, run, pass, punt, run, run, run, punt for about 2:30 of clock burned. Calls plays even a little more aggressive and a first down puts us in the SB.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 




Oh cmon man, its not like the Seahawk defense was down to a backup safety a 3rd and 4th string cb and Sherman playing with one arm. Why wouldn't you throw wr screens out to who he is covering and force him to try and tackle. That is the arrogance of Mike McCarthy and this whole team. I seen Rodgers say they were the better team well the Super Bowl matchup says different. I am tired of McCarty lead teams always saying the same things after a playoff loss. How many times are we going to hear we were the better team but lost.


Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
9 years ago
If you are capable of coming out and moving the ball to get in FG position to tie the game, he should be capable of calling plays to get a first down to burn clock so you don't need to get that FG. If it hadn't been for his ultra-conservative play calling after the INT, the team would be planning what to wear for the SB.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
dhazer
9 years ago
another blunder noone is even bringing up. 1:35 left 3 timeouts, we complete a pass and tick tick then complete another pass tick tick. why the hell didnt we use timeouts and go for the TD, oops thats not in MM's gameplan
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
9 years ago
I am okay with the conservative playcalling late in the 4th up 12 points. A playoff defense should of been able to hold them. However, I'm not okay with not attacking the middle of the field in the second half. That's where the packers made most of their damage in the first half.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
9 years ago

Oh cmon man, its not like the Seahawk defense was down to a backup safety a 3rd and 4th string cb and Sherman playing with one arm. Why wouldn't you throw wr screens out to who he is covering and force him to try and tackle. That is the arrogance of Mike McCarthy and this whole team. I seen Rodgers say they were the better team well the Super Bowl matchup says different. I am tired of McCarty lead teams always saying the same things after a playoff loss. How many times are we going to hear we were the better team but lost.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 



How many times are we going to BE the better team, and still lose?
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
packerfanoutwest
9 years ago

How many times are we going to BE the better team, and still lose?

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 


we were the better team. too bad our coaching staff is not all that good. What does our OC do?
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (19m) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (19m) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (19m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (27m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (28m) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (48m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (3h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (4h) : Packers will get in
beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (7h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.