Defense for the most part

jbshell04
Registered Topic Starter

15 years ago

I can see the Pack going D for the most part. I think line on both sides of the ball will b dominant. I see it playing out like this. Or simular.
1 DE
2 LB
3 OG
3 CB
4 WR
5 DT
6 LB
7 LB

I am therefor I think.

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

15 years ago

You're not saying that's the amount of people at each of those positions that we're going to draft, are you? Because we will have something like 9 or 10 picks this year. Not 31...

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

15 years ago

I am pretty sure those are round numbers. lmao

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

15 years ago

Oh crap, HAHA! I was just thinking he was talking about picking that amount of players at those positions...haha. Whoops, stupid me...

DakotaT
Select Member

15 years ago

You can use rounds 2-7 on defense as long as you draft one of those LT's at number 1. I am sorry, but I just am not enamored by any of the light in the pants DE's in this draft. Cullin is coming back, and we saw enough out of Jeremey Thompson to know he can play.

Let's solitify the offensive first, and then fill the rest of the holes.

Packers_Finland
Registered

15 years ago

Without trade's I think we should go like this:

1 OT
2 DE
3 DT
3 OLB
4 G or C (which would mean Spitz plays guard... I'm thinking Shipley here)
5 CB
6 DT
7 LB

This is a placeholder

Bigbyfan
Member

15 years ago

Without trade's I think we should go like this:

1 OT
2 DE
3 DT
3 OLB
4 G or C (which would mean Spitz plays guard... I'm thinking Shipley here)
5 CB
6 DT
7 LB

"Packers_Finland" wrote:

I agree with this except I would go DT 2 and DE 3.

blank

dhazer
Veteran Member

15 years ago

well by the site ive been watching they have us taking:

1st round : Green Bay Packers: Malcolm Jenkins, CB, Ohio State

2nd round : Green Bay Packers: Jamon Meredith, OT, South Carolina

3rd round : Matt Shaughnessy, DE, Wisconsin

3rd round : Green Bay Packers: Louis Murphy, WR, Florida

The Packers don't really need a receiver, but this is going with Ted Thompson's draft strategy. Louis Murphy is a high second-round prospect, who for some reason, fell in this mock. Hey, the man took Brian Brohm in the second round when he had Aaron Rodgers waiting in the wings.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

Bigbyfan
Member

15 years ago

"dhazer" wrote:

Since Ruvell Martin is most likely not coming back next season, I could see us picking a WR in the draft. Not necessarily as high as the third round though.

blank

thetombradyhater
Registered

15 years ago

#10

How bout:
D-Line
O-Line
Safety

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (7m) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (8m) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (8m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (16m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (16m) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (37m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (1h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (1h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (2h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (2h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (2h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (3h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (3h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (3h) : Packers will get in

beast (3h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (3h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (6h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (6h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (7h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (16h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS