I believe terribly inferior teams can beat excellent teams when they inferior team is at home. I can't recall a brutal team beating a superior team in the superior team's yard.
Originally Posted by: uffda udfa
I believe terribly inferior teams can beat excellent teams when they inferior team is at home. I can't recall a brutal team beating a superior team in the superior team's yard. That stuff rarely happens. However, inferior teams beat superior ones all the time when they are playing at HOME.
blah blah blah blah Packers suck blah blah blah blah blah Packers suck blah blah blah Packers suck..I'm a Green Bay Packers fan--fans of your ilk are just homeys who have no clue how badly the Packers suck...blah blah blah Packers suck...
They have proven to be "contenders" but they certainly aren't "dominant".
Originally Posted by: yooperfan
I'd say few contenders are dominant. I'm not sure I would even say the Seahawks are dominant. Very good? yes. Better than the Packers? yes. But not dominant.
Originally Posted by: sschind
Anyone who thinks a team who makes it to their conference championships game isnt a contender needs to stop watching football and reevaluate their selves as a fan of the Packers or football in general. Packers are clearly contenders and SEA has shown signs of weakness and are beatable despite all the doom and gloom haters on here. Are they tough at home? sure. Does it make the game harder since Rodgers is injured? yup. Does that mean an automatic L? hell no.
Originally Posted by: bboystyle
Over the last six regular season games, the Seahawks had 6, 6, 7, 14, 3, 3 points scored on them. Gonna have to say that is quite dominant, lol.
Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool
The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close