Bulaga has been injured quite often and his replaceable. The coaches seem to be doing a good job with young lineman.
Originally Posted by: shield4life
I just don't get how the best OT on a clearly pass first team is replaceable...
They need guys to protect Rodgers, give him time, and give Lacy space... we had BOTH Clifton and Tausher... they didn't go around trying to replace either of them... if you got a very good linemen, you keep that very good linemen unless they're demanding too much money or causing problems.
We got a lot of OGs on their team, but passing teams (like the Packers are), need pretty good OTs... and the best one we got in the post Clifton/Tausher era, some want to replace... it kind of blows my mind. You need good linemen at important positions to win in the NFL, and OT is about as important as their is on a team that's mainly leaded by their QB and defense does best when they're forcing the other team to pass to play catch-up (usually anyways).
*note* my mind isn't blow by shield4life post, but some of the comments I've heard in person about how easily it'd to just replace Bulaga like he was a street free agent, as another guy (Barclay or Tretter for example) can came on and do just as well as him just like that... Barclay might end up being a very good OG, but is pass blocking is far off from being a very good OT. And I really haven't seen enough of Tretter to make a good judgment, but I remember post draft a lot of people talked about him being moved inside and they moved him inside rather quick, though now looks like they have him working the outsides in the little I've seen him, but that doesn't mean he do as well as Bak, much less Bulaga.