uffda udfa
10 years ago

Not insulting when it's the truth!!!!

You keep bringing up a 6-6 football team, that the Buckeyes played in week 2.

Because of your football ignorance, you have know clue that a team can change in 10 weeks.
Because of your football ignorance, you can't even begin to understand what it takes to build and keep a winning program going, whether it be College or Pro.

All you can do is dwell on everything negative, as long as it fits into your agenda.

Even when it doesn't, you will keep making yourself look stupid by reposting the same bullshit time and time again.

Thus "The internet Funnies" were born and will live forever!!!!!!!

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



Are you in the concussion protocol right now? You should be.

Teams change? You don't say. That is IRRELEVANT to having one loss like TCU and BAYLOR. The FACT remains your team was drilled at home by a 6-6 team. No matter what you type that will NEVER change. No matter what you type TCU will still have one loss...a 3 pointer to a team that many considered putting in the playoff. Hmmmm...let's put these on a scale and weigh the losses. Gee, that's real hard figuring out which loss is worse than the other. A caveman could figure it out. Not Buck...he'll go off topic as much as humanly possible and then insult me for MY football intelligence while he completely ignores over and over what I say. Ever wonder why I repeat myself? You refuse to listen or respond to what is being typed so I'll just keep saying it. It's fun knowing that you know but won't admit to it and the insults that fly to cover that fact are even better.

Not concerned whatsoever what a QB is saying about our ILB. The guys who play D were clearly excited about Sam Barrington because he's so much better than the "warrior". AJ's time was done years ago... he's history. Finished. You aren't...but he is. I think I might enjoy your sad defense of a football player EVERYONE knows is finished over your lack of comprehension on what your Buckeyes loss meant and your insults but it's close.

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


buckeyepackfan
10 years ago

Are you in the concussion protocol right now? You should be.

Teams change? You don't say. That is IRRELEVANT to having one loss like TCU and BAYLOR. The FACT remains your team was drilled at home by a 6-6 team. No matter what you type that will NEVER change. No matter what you type TCU will still have one loss...a 3 pointer to a team that many considered putting in the playoff. Hmmmm...let's put these on a scale and weigh the losses. Gee, that's real hard figuring out which loss is worse than the other. A caveman could figure it out. Not Buck...he'll go off topic as much as humanly possible and then insult me for MY football intelligence while he completely ignores over and over what I say. Ever wonder why I repeat myself? You refuse to listen or respond to what is being typed so I'll just keep saying it. It's fun knowing that you know but won't admit to it and the insults that fly to cover that fact are even better.

Not concerned whatsoever what a QB is saying about our ILB. The guys who play D were clearly excited about Sam Barrington because he's so much better than the "warrior". AJ's time was done years ago... he's history. Finished. You aren't...but he is. I think I might enjoy your sad defense of a football player EVERYONE knows is finished over your lack of comprehension on what your Buckeyes loss meant and your insults but it's close.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Your ignorance is amazing!!!!!!!!

Keep it up!!!!!

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
uffda udfa
10 years ago

Your ignorance is amazing!!!!!!!!

Keep it up!!!!!

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



Buck, are you laughing while strapped in a chair wearing a tight white jacket?

I'll leave this for you...it's probably way beyond you as you like the funny papers...this is from Forbes.com... you can just follow the money as to why your precious Buckeyes who lost by 14 in the Shoe to a bad football team got into the playoff.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/mitchlawrence/2014/12/07/college-football-playoffs-sees-ohio-state-get-no-4-over-baylor-and-tcu-in-a-non-upset/3/ 

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


+1
buckeyepackfan
10 years ago

Buck, are you laughing while strapped in a chair wearing a tight white jacket?

I'll leave this for you...it's probably way beyond you as you like the funny papers...this is from Forbes.com... you can just follow the money as to why your precious Buckeyes who lost by 14 in the Shoe to a bad football team got into the playoff.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/mitchlawrence/2014/12/07/college-football-playoffs-sees-ohio-state-get-no-4-over-baylor-and-tcu-in-a-non-upset/3/ 

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Ahhh you didn't dissapoint!!!!!

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

Your "experts" point being what everyone already knew, if not for JT Barret breaking his ankle the week before, The Buckeyes would have already been in the top 4.

Urban Meyer had one chance to prove The Buckeyes should be where they are and he took full advantage.

I really don't care what you leave me with......JUST LEAVE!!!!!!!

By virtue of TCU losing to Baylor, in reality they didn't even win their Conference.

They can cry foul all they want, in the end, The voices who matter, The 12 person committee, MADE THE RIGHT DECISION.

So you just keep posting your stupidity on a subject you once again HAVE NO CLUE about and I will keep enjoying uffda's"internet funnies'!!!!!!

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
+1
uffda udfa
10 years ago

Ahhh you didn't dissapoint!!!!!

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

Your "experts" point being what everyone already knew, if not for JT Barret breaking his ankle the week before, The Buckeyes would have already been in the top 4.

Urban Meyer had one chance to prove The Buckeyes should be where they are and he took full advantage.

I really don't care what you leave me with......JUST LEAVE!!!!!!!

By virtue of TCU losing to Baylor, in reality they didn't even win their Conference.

They can cry foul all they want, in the end, The voices who matter, The 12 person committee, MADE THE RIGHT DECISION.

So you just keep posting your stupidity on a subject you once again HAVE NO CLUE about and I will keep enjoying uffda's"internet funnies'!!!!!!

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



I could keep going and going...you know that. You are beyond clueless how this whole bowl thing operates. It's as corrupt as it gets...it isn't sports... it's a level of disgusting you obviously are oblivious to. You do prove that ignorance is bliss while ripping me. It is pure gold...the richness...the irony of you saying what you're saying to me.

One day, perhaps, you'll grow up and do some real thinking instead of your reactionary juvenile just barely the surface of an issue type. I believe in you but, clearly, today is not that day.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


buckeyepackfan
10 years ago

I could keep going and going...you know that. You are beyond clueless how this whole bowl thing operates. It's as corrupt as it gets...it isn't sports... it's a level of disgusting you obviously are oblivious to. You do prove that ignorance is bliss while ripping me. It is pure gold...the richness...the irony of you saying what you're saying to me.

One day, perhaps, you'll grow up and do some real thinking instead of your reactionary juvenile just barely the surface of an issue type. I believe in you but, clearly, today is not that day.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 




😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

If I'm beyond clueless, JUST STOP REPLYING!!!!

Once again you have established yourself as the only member of this forum who understands football.

College or Pro.

Damn must be tough to know EVERYTHING and realize NO ONE will believe anything you say.

The only thing I don't understand is what talking about College football Bowl games has to do with you proving Ted Thompson needs to be fired!!!!!

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

Let me recap:

You have no Respect for Football Fans, You have No respect for Packer fans, You have No respect for Wisconsin football , you have NO respect for The Big Ten as a whole.

You just keep right on posting your Bullshit, like everyone here is clueless.

I'll just keep on pointing out to you that You are The Biggest Joke to ever show up on this forum!!!!

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆




I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
uffda udfa
10 years ago

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

If I'm beyond clueless, JUST STOP REPLYING!!!!

Once again you have established yourself as the only member of this forum who understands football.

College or Pro.

Damn must be tough to know EVERYTHING and realize NO ONE will believe anything you say.

The only thing I don't understand is what talking about College football Bowl games has to do with you proving Ted Thompson needs to be fired!!!!!

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

Let me recap:

You have no Respect for Football Fans, You have No respect for Packer fans, You have No respect for Wisconsin football , you have NO respect for The Big Ten as a whole.

You just keep right on posting your Bullshit, like everyone here is clueless.

I'll just keep on pointing out to you that You are The Biggest Joke to ever show up on this forum!!!!

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆




Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



You have misstated my positions but if it's fun for you keep on keeping on.

You were right that I have no respect for the Big 10...nobody who knows football does. Wisconsin football isn't relevant to me because of the issues I have with college football in the first place. They play in the Big 10, so I don't have any respect for them.

Your overuse of emoticons is emblematic of an inferiority complex. I know you know the truth about your Buckeyes and whether they belong or not and how they got to where they are. It is fun pretending the truth isn't the truth though isn't it?

AJ Hawk is 30 and has been replaced by a late round draft choice with zero athleticism. Ironically, the position is improved over our wasted former high 1st rounder. How does someone like you square that fact? You don't...you just insult the person who is asking you to justify your inerrant beliefs.

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


PackFanWithTwins
10 years ago
Ask any GM if they would spend the 5th overall pick, to end up with a player that would play for 9 years almost never missing a game, that would be the signal caller for defense, and lead the team in tackles and you can bet, those GMs would say Yes without a blink.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
+3
uffda udfa
10 years ago

Ask any GM if they would spend the 5th overall pick, to end up with a player that would play for 9 years almost never missing a game, that would be the signal caller for defense, and lead the team in tackles and you can bet, those GMs would say Yes without a blink.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



Not if you told them they were referring to AJ Hawk who I believe has caused 1 or 2 fumbles in his last 6 years as a LB...has few INT's, Sacks, and has NEVER scored a defensive TD. Peppers has TWO this year and he's not even played one full season and is 34 years old playing a position he's never played in his career. Yes, ILB's aren't judged by their TD's but to have...ZERO...in 9 years and so few forced fumbles? Almost zero impact.

You do realize an ILB or MLB SHOULD lead your team in tackles? Nick Barnett is way up there on the list for all time tackles, in fact...he's 3rd all time. The guy was average but a little better than AJ. If you honestly believe AJ was a great player, you have to believe that about Nick Barnett, too. Do you?

I respect Hawk for his availability. His tackling numbers are nothing but longevity based...not a great player...nowhere near one, actually.

http://www.packers.com/history/record-book/packers-individual-records.html#defense 

EDIT: Prior to this season, if we were to compare Hawk's all time tackling numbers to Barnett's AJ would lead 1025 to 1014 (source: packers.com) The funny thing is that Hawk took 126 games to have an 11 tackle lead over Nick Barnett who played 103 games. So, Hawk took 23 more games to have 11 more tackles than Nick Barnett. Nick Barnett=Not very good. AJ Hawk not as good as Nick Barnett...overall, AJ Hawk just never, ever good enough.

To really end this foolishness on AJ and all his "impressive" tackles... keep in mind that the most tackles Hawk ever had in a season was 155. Nick Barnett had 194 in a season for the record. Hawk was nowhere close to Barnett in holding the single season tackling record. AJ Hawk is right up there with the legendary Randy Scott who had 151 tackles in a single season back in '85. Remember him? Dominant!
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


uffda udfa
10 years ago

http://www.packersnews.com/story/sports/nfl/packers/insidersblog/2014/12/09/rodgers-hawk-one-of-the-greatest-football-warriors/20169469/


"He's one of the toughest guys I've ever played with," Rodgers said. "He is, hands down, one of the greatest football warriors that I've played with. I mean, the guy has dealt with a ton of injuries over his time and played through them, and played really well through them. He's been a great Packer for us for so many years, and just embodies what it means to be a Packer.

"A great teammate, a great player, and really, really great in the community. The things that he supports, and his foundations, and just the way that he conducts himself, I think, makes all Packer fans proud. He's been a great teammate in the locker room. Nothing's changed with him. I think he's just continuing to be ready and play whatever role he's asked to play."


Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



I love that you left this part out...

“A.J. and I are good friends and we’ve spent a lot of time together, sitting next to each other in meetings for the last nine years. Obviously, a lot of games together, a lot of wins, a lot of good times, a lot of dinners that his wife has invited me over to — she’s a great cook,” Rodgers said. “I’ve always really enjoyed his friendship and his leadership on our team and just his attitude toward football.


---Umm, I know you're so football smart and me so dumb, but don't you think that's kind of germane to the discussion here? Rodgers and Hawk are buddies. Aaron is anything but objective when it comes to his commentary, but guys like you feed off nonsense like that. Puff pieces are hard hitting truths to you.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


+1
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    beast (2h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
    beast (10h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
    packerfanoutwest (14h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
    Martha Careful (16h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
    Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
    buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
    buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
    Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
    Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
    beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
    beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
    beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
    beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
    beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    29 - 34
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    16 - 10
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    30 - 14
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    29 - 31
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    24 - 19
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    34 - 13
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    24 - 22
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    30 - 27
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    14 - 24
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    20 - 19
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    38 - 10
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    30 - 17
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    31 - 34
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    30 - 13
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    34 - 0
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    5h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

    11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    12h / Random Babble / beast

    17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.