uffda udfa
10 years ago

No, not Ted anything. It was just a very well designed graphic. I can't picture fully enough to describe, but I remember seeing it and each time thinking "now that's a nice graphic". I believe it had the Packers logo on it and was gray-ish.


BTW, these power rankings are spot on accurate. Notice no one wants to chirp up now. HA!

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



This the one?
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
10 years ago
All right. I have R-E-L-A-Xed. GB after beating both Phillie without Foles and New England with potty mouth Brady are contenders. [rockon]
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
10 years ago

All right. I have R-E-L-A-Xed. GB after beating both Phillie without Foles and New England with potty mouth Brady are contenders. [rockon]

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Proved we COULD do it. Now let's show we can do it consistently!
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
nerdmann
10 years ago


Suck it, Bayless!

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
+1
steveishere
10 years ago



Suck it, Bayless!

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



It wasn't a blown coverage on Jordy. Revis was there and in coverage Jordy just toasted him on the route and after the catch.
+1
mi_keys
10 years ago

It wasn't a blown coverage on Jordy. Revis was there and in coverage Jordy just toasted him on the route and after the catch.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



And Gronk never remotely had it long enough. Obvious troll is obvious.
Born and bred a cheesehead
+1
macbob
10 years ago

This is the kind of game you have to at least compete in to prove you're worthy of the praise you've been receiving. Only after a game like this can you truly get excited about what this team is or might be...not before like some of you have taken the bait on, anointing this team way too soon.

The Pats could very well leave Lambeau a victor of 21+ points...then what? R-E-L-A-X because we don't have to face another team with a great QB for the rest of the regular season?

I'm curious to see what we are on Sunday. I don't feel real good about what our D is going to do and I'm concerned about our O as well.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Well, uffda udfa?

We just beat the top team in the AFC (up to this point in the season), with a great QB, best TE in the league, and a great coach. Didn't play our best game on offense: settled for 4 FGs, at least one of which should have been a TD (dropped pass). The Packers D held an explosive offense to 320 yards total offense and 21 pts. Oh, and the D gave up 84 yards rushing.

As a reminder of some of your previous posts:

Our D is rated 32nd. I couldn't care less how the season starts. I care about where it's going to end and it'll be no better than it has been the last 3 seasons.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Actually, in addition to your stats, the Packers are 32nd vs. the run. DEAD LAST. All the other numbers are well and good...but to leave out the one that really shows what this D is...c'mon. Hasn't stopped the run...won't stop the run.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



You can continue living in fantasy land...that is your choice. I think the Packers are much closer to being brutal than just playing brutal for a few games.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Just see what is RIGHT NOW. This team is not very good.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Plenty of other material to quote from out there, but that captures the flavor of them...unrelenting assertions that the Packers team was crap.
+1
Zero2Cool
10 years ago

All right. I have R-E-L-A-Xed. GB after beating both Phillie without Foles and New England with potty mouth Brady are contenders. [rockon]

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Nick Foles was not playing as well as Mark Sanchez has been so that doesn't even need to be worth mentioning. [duh]


The thoroughality of beating the Eagles and this zero turnovers from either team win over the Patriots.

CON
freaking
TENDER
UserPostedImage
+2
macbob
10 years ago

OK. So, I'll wait until after the Patriots game to make that call... [boxing]

Originally Posted by: macbob 



That answered that...

CONTENDER
+1
sschind
10 years ago

Nick Foles was not playing as well as Mark Sanchez has been so that doesn't even need to be worth mentioning. [duh]


The thoroughality of beating the Eagles and this zero turnovers from either team win over the Patriots.

CON
freaking
TENDER

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Just don't start picking them to win or it could throw a wrench into the whole works.

Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    packerfanoutwest (1h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
    Martha Careful (3h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
    Mucky Tundra (13h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
    buckeyepackfan (13h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
    buckeyepackfan (13h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
    Mucky Tundra (13h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
    Zero2Cool (13h) : Watson gonna be OK???
    packerfanoutwest (17h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
    packerfanoutwest (17h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
    packerfanoutwest (17h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
    Zero2Cool (20h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
    Zero2Cool (20h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
    bboystyle (20h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
    Zero2Cool (20h) : Ahh, ok.
    bboystyle (20h) : yes due to tie breaker
    Zero2Cool (20h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
    Zero2Cool (20h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
    bboystyle (20h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
    Mucky Tundra (21h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
    beast (21h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
    beast (21h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
    Zero2Cool (22h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
    bboystyle (22h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
    Mucky Tundra (22h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
    Zero2Cool (22h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
    beast (22h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
    packerfanoutwest (23h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
    Zero2Cool (23h) : I see what you did there Mucky
    Zero2Cool (23h) : dammit. 3:25pm
    Zero2Cool (23h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
    beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
    beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    29 - 34
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    16 - 10
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    30 - 14
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    29 - 31
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    24 - 19
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    34 - 13
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    24 - 22
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    30 - 27
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    14 - 24
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    20 - 19
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    38 - 10
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    30 - 17
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    31 - 34
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    30 - 13
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    34 - 0
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    9h / GameDay Threads / Mucky Tundra

    12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.