TT's TEAM !· Page 3 · PACKERSHOME

DakotaT
Select Member

10 years ago

Why don't you and uffda kick this around for another 10 pages.

That's all he is fishing for.

Another thread for him to post his 100's of "Ted Thompson should be fired" posts.

Let the re-hashing begin.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan

Nah, I just don't share your rah rah enthusiasm for the Sherman Packers. Lots of NFC North Championships, and they never even sniffed a George Halas, yet alone a Lombardi. The man never got it done, but Ted Thompson has.

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#22

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

Rah Rah???? I said he was a good HC, terrible GM/HC

If that's rah rah well then.

rah rah rah shish boom bah!!!!

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

Mucky Tundra
Honored Member

10 years ago

#23

Uncle Buck vs Uncle Uffda?

“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”

"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#24

Uncle Buck vs Uncle Uffda?

Originally Posted by: Mucky Tundra

Na...I've dismissed him long ago.

Not worth the time or effort.

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#25

I LOVE that Buck says I "know nothing about football". To mock me for researched posts is interesting. I use links and quotes to buoy my own opinions. I ask lots of questions. How you can conclude I know nothing about football and you do when you love AJ Hawk is beyond me.

Our D is rated 32nd. I couldn't care less how the season starts. I care about where it's going to end and it'll be no better than it has been the last 3 seasons.

Sherman was neither a good HC nor a good GM. You wouldn't know it looking at the posts from back then. I read them just not on this forum. Sherman was viewed as a joke from those who played for him or played the game.

TT's team has the 32nd ranked run D and best QB in the NFL. Not much has changed. Same old Ted Thompson Packers just hoping Rodgers gets hot to carry them to another one. What a great plan that is. The same exact plan Sherman had...hope Brett gets really hot when it matters. The thinking of our last two HC/GM combos (I realize Sherman had dual role) have been just brilliant.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

Smokey
Veteran Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

#26

Get ur done !![boxing]

DakotaT
Select Member

10 years ago

#27

I'm not sure a complete football team is even attainable in these times. We've had an above average football team for quite some time now, but winning championships is so much better, which is why some of us get frustrated.

Saying Uffda knows nothing about football is ludicrous. Calling him a psseimist is a lot more accurate. The Green Bay Packers are the NFL team with the college spirit, and that permeates thorughout its fans.

beast
Select Member

10 years ago

#28

With the rules favoring the offenses, defenses can't stop everything... Packers defense scheme focuses on about creating pressure on other teams passing game which puts the DL at disadvantage in the running game at times.

And with it being a passing league coaches seem to be alright with giving up running yards to save against passing points.

And yes the Packers could use an upgrade along DL as well (what teams couldn't use an healthy upgrade on the DL?)

nerdmann
Premier Member

10 years ago

#29

Originally Posted by: beast

These are excellent points, and with the game being in such a transitional phase, who knows how relevent the current statistics are to showing what is truly effective in the current way of doing things.

That said, other teams are getting it done better than we are, or at least seem to be.

My biggest hope is in the potential development of these younger players. *gulp*

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#30

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Wow I guess all I can do is quote The Green Bay Packers current Head Coach.

Mike McCarthy..."STATS ARE FOR LOSERS"!!!!

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

TT's team is currently tied for 1st place in the division.

Mike McCarthy..."STATS ARE FOR LOSERS"!!!!

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (1h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (3h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (13h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (13h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (13h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (13h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (13h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (17h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (17h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (17h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (19h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (19h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (19h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (19h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (20h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (20h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (20h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (20h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (21h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (21h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (21h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (21h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (21h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (22h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (22h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (22h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (22h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS