What's wrong with Gay marriage?· Page 36

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

The "topic" was insignificant when it began, and completely worn out several pages ago.

Have you perchance noticed that topics are like market forces - they drift where the demand/interest takes them. Who gives a rats ass? Whoever comments on them - apparently including you hahahaha.

I've actually tried several times at the tail end of replies to what's there, to take things back in the direction of the original lame topic,

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker

I won't argue it is a "lame" topic, however, for whatever reason some people who feel they should have the right to dictate who and who cannot marry. That is the subject being discussed here and the validity of such arrogance. Are there some financial ramifications? Health insurance ramifications?

texaspackerbacker
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#352

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

hahahaha I tried.

Of course there are those aspects ....... (Beavis voice: "hey Butthead, he said ass-pecks"), but they are even more boring than the topic in general. Besides, I think I or somebody covered that - that lesser thing - domestic partners or whatever it's called gives 'em all those bennies already. Most of 'em don't care anyway ..... Who wouldn't read titillating crap like Gunny's post than this? And rotten and wrongheaded as Dakota's posts are, they, too, are a helluva lot more interesting to reply to as well as significant.

Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.

dfosterf
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#353

I hit what I aim at.

I am sure that back in the day, dfosterf was an excellent marksman.
But now, due to how shall I put this, his longevity on this earth, I would venture that all that the old Gunner would now see is "Maggie's Drawers" [boxing]

That should be good for a very interesting diatribe from the Gunner. [grin1]

Originally Posted by: Gilligan

Wrong. It's true. I can't hit the bulls ass with a banjo anymore, comparatively speaking, it is a young man's game. I DID qualify expert with the M-16/variants over 30 times in a row. KD- B-mod- didn't matter- wind (see list of things I hate) Not to mention rifles with optics...I WAS considered one of the hardest shooters in the Corps. I WAS a scout/sniper, but... it was a lifestyle thing. No alcohol, long-distance running, no caffeine. Hard-core.

I would probably go unq right now, so you got me on that one. (I did head shoot that GD groundhog at max range a few years ago, so maybe I got something left, lol pics were provided)

...and messin' with me on a pool table would probably be a mistake- that's all I got. [-x

edit- I did have to wear a toilet seat one year with the pistol. I had a bad day, and I assure you, I got ragged for it.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

#354

Wrong. It's true. I can't hit the bulls ass with a banjo anymore, comparatively speaking, it is a young man's game.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf

So, you're in favor of allowing homosexuals to marry? Or are you trying to expand this subject to marrying animals as you have such fascination with a bulls ass?

dfosterf
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#355

So, you're in favor of allowing homosexuals to marry? Or are you trying to expand this subject to marrying animals as you have such fascination with a bulls ass?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Look, you guys can do anything you want to do. It's none of my business. 😆

To the rest of you, that may not know how Gilligan rolls-

http://www.usmcpress.com/heritage/marine_corps_rifleman 's_creed.htm

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

#356

Originally Posted by: dfosterf

Oh, I get ya now. You want to be able to use firearms as well! Well, I don't think there any laws against what sexual devices you and your male partner use. I think you'll be fine. I would stay away from the animals though, that's just sick! [puke]

dfosterf
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#357

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Not even the sheep? I'm from Wisconsin. Everyone in Minnesota (according to PPO) seems to feel we are inherently authorized and inclined to tag them in the tucas.

Thus far, I haven't had the proclivity, but I am a prone to influences from my home state, and experienced members.

Tell me of your own likes and dislikes in the arena, and I will take it under consideration. 😢 It sounds like your experiences have been less than ideal, but I'd need you to spell them out. I sense that you saying my results might vary from yours.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

9 years ago

#358

I sure hope that now same sex marriage is legally acceptable, it freaking goes away!

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#359

I sure hope that now same sex marriage is legally acceptable, it freaking goes away!

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

The legal wrangling in Texas has only just begun. It will be a doozy to watch.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

texaspackerbacker
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#360

I sure hope that now same sex marriage is legally acceptable, it freaking goes away!

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

It's not the relatively decent and normal homosexual types pushing this crap; It's the God damned mostly non-homosexual leftists whose primary goal is to drag down the country - and in particular now, with the election coming on the horizon, to try to energize the bad people who might be kinda lethargic about Ol' Hillary or whoever the Dem/libs put up.

There are a lot of battles out there - a lot of issues, and the damn leftists are losing most of them. This one, however, they beat us on - kinda like the Packers going 15-1 and this is the one. The whole concept of legitimatizing same-sex ass-fucking and calling it marriage is disgusting and annoying, but in the final analysis, it ain't gonna make a helluva lot of difference in the lives of us Good Normal Americans.

Let's just move on and continue to enjoy the FREEDOM, COMFORT, and SECURITY we have in this, the Greatest Country in the History of the World.

Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (2h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (10h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (14h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (16h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS