uffda udfa
10 years ago
Boykin 1 for 6...nothing last week.

Adams 5 for 50... in his 2nd NFL game. Pretty impressive for a rook.

This is an encouraging development. We need a competent 3rd WR and I've not been sure Boykin, who is a nice player, is what we need in a 3rd WR.

Now, if we can get Janis active and displace Boykin to 5th, I'll be happy. We need that speed element.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


DakotaT
10 years ago
What would be cool is if Davante got good enough to become oiur #2 receiver and Janis #3, then losing Cobb won't sting as much. Pretty tough to pay Aaron, Jordy, and Matthews what we do and then give Cobb what he is going to want.

Adams did have a prolific college career, so this kind of performance should be expected.
UserPostedImage
musccy
10 years ago

What would be cool is if Davante got good enough to become oiur #2 receiver and Janis #3, then losing Cobb won't sting as much. Pretty tough to pay Aaron, Jordy, and Matthews what we do and then give Cobb what he is going to want.

Adams did have a prolific college career, so this kind of performance should be expected.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



This is on the back of a lot of people's minds, most prominently Ted and his salary cappers.

If the rest of the season plays out like today with Jordy, maybe Cobb's price tag will be more manageable.

nerdmann
10 years ago

This is on the back of a lot of people's minds, most prominently Ted and his salary cappers.

If the rest of the season plays out like today with Jordy, maybe Cobb's price tag will be more manageable.

Originally Posted by: musccy 



Cap's going up. They'll figure it out.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
musccy
10 years ago

Cap's going up. They'll figure it out.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



I don't know that it's going up the 10 mil or so it went up this year, though. It'll go up for other teams too.

Hopefully they can clear about 8 with B Jones and Raji no longer on the books.
uffda udfa
10 years ago

I don't know that it's going up the 10 mil or so it went up this year, though. It'll go up for other teams too.

Hopefully they can clear about 8 with B Jones and Raji no longer on the books.

Originally Posted by: musccy 



Don't forget...Hawk and Tramon are likely casualties and Sherrod's option wasn't picked up... well over 10 million available letting those 3 walk.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


DakotaT
10 years ago

Don't forget...Hawk and Tramon are likely casualties and Sherrod's option wasn't picked up... well over 10 million available letting those 3 walk.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



You think Sherrod is expendable? Up shit creek is where we'd be without him. That is a quality backup at a very important position. Agree on Hawk and Tramon though, but House and Hayward need more development first.
UserPostedImage
steveishere
10 years ago

You think Sherrod is expendable? Up shit creek is where we'd be without him. That is a quality backup at a very important position. Agree on Hawk and Tramon though, but House and Hayward need more development first.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



If we picked up Sherrods option it would have been like 6m or something. If we can resign him pretty cheap then cool but we still have Barclay signed for next year I think so even if he walks not a huge deal unless he keeps improving throughout the season.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
10 years ago

You think Sherrod is expendable? Up shit creek is where we'd be without him. That is a quality backup at a very important position. Agree on Hawk and Tramon though, but House and Hayward need more development first.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



I missed most of the game but whenever someone pressured Aaron in the first half the radio guys said that the defender came in over Sherrod. I don't want to see them pay $6 million to a guy who can't block any better than a street free agent can. Larry McCarren went so far as to say after one play, "Sherrod has to be stronger with his right foot and right hand." I have no idea exactly what he means but I assume the is not keeping contain to the outside of the line.

The little I did see in the second half seemed to be plays where they kept someone in to help Sherrod. I don't mind having a player in to help out on blocking but if a 1st round pick needs hep something is wrong.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
10 years ago

Boykin 1 for 6...nothing last week.

Adams 5 for 50... in his 2nd NFL game. Pretty impressive for a rook.

This is an encouraging development. We need a competent 3rd WR and I've not been sure Boykin, who is a nice player, is what we need in a 3rd WR.

Now, if we can get Janis active and displace Boykin to 5th, I'll be happy. We need that speed element.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Let me get this straight.

Boykin vs Sherman - Packers deliberately avoid that entire side of the field and you knock Boykin for that?

Adams vs Jets weak secondary and you give Adams credit as being impressive?

[duh]
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (9m) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (9m) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23m) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (25m) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (26m) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (26m) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (27m) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (31m) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (31m) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (31m) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (32m) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (33m) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (36m) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (40m) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (42m) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (42m) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (51m) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (57m) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (59m) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (1h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (1h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (1h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (1h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (1h) : Packers will get in
beast (1h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (1h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (1h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (3h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (4h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (4h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (4h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (5h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (14h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (14h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (18h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!
wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
34m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.