yooperfan
15 years ago

If we made a run at a Quailty lb like Terrell Suggs i would like to see the Packers go to the 3-4. I love the flexabilty it gives your lb's and the blitz pagkages look to have many more options.

"gotarace" wrote:



Don't hold your breath on that one.
djcubez
15 years ago
If we knew what we'd get from Barnett after his injury maybe going 3-4 wouldn't be a bad idea, granted we bring in a good NT. But since Nick won't be back in time for the start of training camp, changing schemes would be bad idea.
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
I asked about what scheme Ted played in because I feel that might play role, small, but possible because he's familiar with the type of player required.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago

I asked about what scheme Ted played in because I feel that might play role, small, but possible because he's familiar with the type of player required.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Houston played in a 3-4 at Houston from what I see.



Trivia. Which Packer QB played with Ted in Houston?

Ole Peg Leg himself. Lynn Dickey
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Hmm, so Ted played in a 3 - 4? Now with two 3 - 4 flavored DC's running around out there that makes me a little more curious. With knowing that, I'd be less surprised if Crennel or Nolan came here under McCarthy.
UserPostedImage
porky88
15 years ago
People don't understand that most 3-4 outside pass rushing linebackers are defensive ends in the 4-3 scheme. I think GB needs to have a 3-4 package, but not use it as their base defense.

Another problem is Desmond Bishop is way to undersized for it.

Here is what a Packers 3-4 Defense looks like

DL Cullen Jenkins
NT Ryan Pickett
DL Johnny Jolly

OLB Aaron Kampman
ILB A.J. Hawk
ILB Nick Barnett
OLB Brady Poppinga

CB Charles Woodson
CB Al Harris
FS Nick Collins
SS Atari Bigby

Basically the same players but move Kampman to OLB and I don't think he could play very well there. He'd be a Matt Roth like player probably and GB would probably ask him to shed at least 5 to 10 pounds this off season to get into more athletic shape.

My point is the 3-4 defense is a awful fit for arguably the Packers best defensive player. It really puts them into a hold. If anyone can make a change it's Aaron Kampman though.

If you go with the 3-4 you would need to draft a 3-4 pass rusher for sure and I think they're are plenty in the draft to find. Everette Brown and Briak Orakpo would be pretty good picks for the Packers then. Both could play that OLB 3-4 spot.

I also think you need to bring in at least two or three defensive lineman. In round two, Tyson Jackson would be a good pick as a 3-4 DE if he's even there.
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago

Hmm, so Ted played in a 3 - 4? Now with two 3 - 4 flavored DC's running around out there that makes me a little more curious. With knowing that, I'd be less surprised if Crennel or Nolan came here under McCarthy.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



All of these coaches have experience at both styles.

Doesn't matter really what they are running now.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
all_about_da_packers
15 years ago

People don't understand that most 3-4 outside pass rushing linebackers are defensive ends in the 4-3 scheme. I think GB needs to have a 3-4 package, but not use it as their base defense.

Another problem is Desmond Bishop is way to undersized for it.

Here is what a Packers 3-4 Defense looks like

DL Cullen Jenkins
NT Ryan Pickett
DL Johnny Jolly

OLB Aaron Kampman
ILB A.J. Hawk
ILB Nick Barnett
OLB Brady Poppinga

CB Charles Woodson
CB Al Harris
FS Nick Collins
SS Atari Bigby

"porky88" wrote:



Too soon to worry about personnel fitting. We'll have draft and UFA to improve.

Firstly, Jolly may very well be the NT in the scheme. Can't say for certain.

Secondly, I still think Kampman is too good a player to struggle in a 3-4 switch. I personally think he'll be fine at DE in the 3-4, too strong and quick to be unsuccessful at DE in 3-4. Kampman's a player in a 3-4, despite his size IMO.

Also, you've got Jason Taylor as a potential FA, so he may fit the bill at OLB. I still think Bishop can contribute as a ILB, he's strong and tough even if a bit under sized.

At the end of the day, attempting to fit our current personnel in the 3-4 is an exercise in futility because we've got the whole off-season to adjust our current personnel.

Especially if we bring in a guy like Mike Nolan, I dare say he'll make the 3-4 work with the players he has.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
porky88
15 years ago

People don't understand that most 3-4 outside pass rushing linebackers are defensive ends in the 4-3 scheme. I think GB needs to have a 3-4 package, but not use it as their base defense.

Another problem is Desmond Bishop is way to undersized for it.

Here is what a Packers 3-4 Defense looks like

DL Cullen Jenkins
NT Ryan Pickett
DL Johnny Jolly

OLB Aaron Kampman
ILB A.J. Hawk
ILB Nick Barnett
OLB Brady Poppinga

CB Charles Woodson
CB Al Harris
FS Nick Collins
SS Atari Bigby

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



Too soon to worry about personnel fitting. We'll have draft and UFA to improve.

Firstly, Jolly may very well be the NT in the scheme. Can't say for certain.

Secondly, I still think Kampman is too good a player to struggle in a 3-4 switch. I personally think he'll be fine at DE in the 3-4, too strong and quick to be unsuccessful at DE in 3-4. Kampman's a player in a 3-4, despite his size IMO.

Also, you've got Jason Taylor as a potential FA, so he may fit the bill at OLB. I still think Bishop can contribute as a ILB, he's strong and tough even if a bit under sized.

At the end of the day, attempting to fit our current personnel in the 3-4 is an exercise in futility because we've got the whole off-season to adjust our current personnel.

Especially if we bring in a guy like Mike Nolan, I dare say he'll make the 3-4 work with the players he has.

"porky88" wrote:



Johnny Jolly is a much lesser version of a Haloti Ngata type player in that he could be a NT or a DE. The 3-4 defensive end's No. 1 priority is to be a great run stopper and to fill their gaps.

You want players on the 3-4 defensive line that can stop the run and Jolly, Pickett, and probably Jenkins are the best suited for it because they can stop the run. Although I don't think Jenkins plays as well in the 3-4 as much as people think. His size indicates it, but I think Cullen Jenkins is a better fit as a cover 2 defensive tackle.

Aaron Kampman is undersized to be a defensive end in the scheme, but not athletic enough to be an outside backer. It puts the Packers in a tough position. Kampman is one of the five best "craftiest" pass rushers in the game today. You put him at DE in the 3-4 and all of a sudden your taking his best asset and handicapping it.

I think Mike Nolan would run a 3-4/4-3 hybrid. GB would use both of them quite a bit. Baltimore does certain things like that as do a lot of teams today.

Nick Saban actually did that in Miami and Jason Taylor thrived in it.
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago
I wouldn't rule out a switch, eventually. But it would involve to much for one off season.

But if you look at contracts. Kampman, Jolly and Pickett are up after 2009. It could be setup for a two year process.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (10m) : Merry Christmas!
beast (8h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (16h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (21h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (23h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19h / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.