DarkaneRules
10 years ago

Examining the Green Bay Packers' roster:

Quarterbacks (3)

[list=1]

  • Aaron Rodgers
  • Matt Flynn
  • Scott Tolzien[/list]

  • If the Packers are leaning toward keeping only two quarterbacks, then Matt Flynn likely will be their guy. Although he has a lower ceiling than Tolzien, he's been the more consistent performer so far in training camp. The Packers have not kept three quarterbacks on their opening-day roster since 2008, but they might be inclined to do so this season in order to avoid a situation like last year, when Rodgers broke his collarbone.

    Rob Demovsky  wrote:


    Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
    beast
    10 years ago

    Interesting 53 he has there. On offense I can see what he's coming from... but only 5 on the DL? ... yes I know Peppers and Neal might be rotating in as well... but going that light on the number of guys that are inside DL size seems like a bad idea unless we're going back to a 4-3 defense.

    I forgot which years but there was 2 or 3 mostly between 2005 and 2010 where the defense looked pretty good, but one or two of the DL got banged or up hurt... and the defense was completely done for... because they no longer had depth there and lack a DL rotation... they had some talented DL left, but by the 4th quarter they were tired, winded and were getting pushed around.

    If they go to a 5 man DL, then Neal and Peppers better be able to play at inside 3-4 DE... which Neal has done before but never when he was this light (I heard someone suggest he might be 265 lbs now) and one of the writers on twitter said he got swallowed up by an UDFA OG on one play... NFL starting OL might have their way with him if he's playing inside DL at such a light weight. (of course it's possible he could still play there as well... but unless they're 100% sure he can do it... it sounds like a big risk to me going to light there).


    Also I'm under the general idea that makes it as a STer. Maybe try to sneak CB Goodson (who I haven't heard much about, good or bad) to the practice squad?

    I wonder what are the chances of RB Rajion Neal making it over a 3rd QB, Kuhn or 9th OL.

    With Barclay and Taylor the Packers have four OGs... it's too bad none of them can back-up Center and save a spot. Of course they might keep Linsley anyways to develop. But that's a lot of OGs/C ...
    UserPostedImage
    musccy
    10 years ago

    only 5 on the DL? ... yes I know Peppers and Neal might be rotating in as well... but going that light on the number of guys that are inside DL size seems like a bad idea unless we're going back to a 4-3 defense.

    I wonder what are the chances of RB Rajion Neal making it over a 3rd QB, Kuhn or 9th OL.

    Originally Posted by: beast 



    Agreed on the DL, add Perry to the mix of players who could be DL tweeners since that was his college position. I get that Guion and Worthy haven't done anything, so what's the alternative option? Still, 5 seems REALLY thin.

    Everyone loves Kuhn as a player, including A.R. and I know he had the Peppers block, but he still seems slow, nonathletic, and hard for me to believe some of the other young guys wouldn't be a physical upgrade.

    At LB, Demovsky mentioned Thomas...never heard of him to be honest and was hoping for Hubbard just because I was so intrigued by his numbers, but maybe he's someone the Packers could effectively stash on the practice squad.
    steveishere
    10 years ago

    Agreed on the DL, add Perry to the mix of players who could be DL tweeners since that was his college position. I get that Guion and Worthy haven't done anything, so what's the alternative option? Still, 5 seems REALLY thin.

    Everyone loves Kuhn as a player, including A.R. and I know he had the Peppers block, but he still seems slow, nonathletic, and hard for me to believe some of the other young guys wouldn't be a physical upgrade.

    At LB, Demovsky mentioned Thomas...never heard of him to be honest and was hoping for Hubbard just because I was so intrigued by his numbers, but maybe he's someone the Packers could effectively stash on the practice squad.

    Originally Posted by: musccy 



    Kuhn didn't just have that 1 block though he was consistently good picking up blitzes all year and him and Lacy gelled pretty well as a lead block/runner combo. Also throw in Kuhn is good for some nice ST plays throughout the year as well. It would be tough to cut him for a 4th RB that probably wont see the field nearly as much.
    beast
    10 years ago

    Agreed on the DL, add Perry to the mix of players who could be DL tweeners since that was his college position. I get that Guion and Worthy haven't done anything, so what's the alternative option? Still, 5 seems REALLY thin.

    Originally Posted by: musccy 



    Very good point on what's the alternative option... the other options would be UDFA or pick-up from another team.
    Packers have DEs Carlos Gray and Luther Robinson and DT Mike Pennel... I read one of the DEs was getting 2nd string snaps with Boyd in the nickel defense (which surprised me; I think it was Gray but I'm not sure), but maybe they were just giving the vets a break? Also read Pennel does a very good job of keeping his pads low for his size. But the Packers might be able to throw them on the practice squad?


    Everyone loves Kuhn as a player, including A.R. and I know he had the Peppers block, but he still seems slow, nonathletic, and hard for me to believe some of the other young guys wouldn't be a physical upgrade.

    Kuhn didn't just have that 1 block though he was consistently good picking up blitzes all year and him and Lacy gelled pretty well as a lead block/runner combo. Also throw in Kuhn is good for some nice ST plays throughout the year as well. It would be tough to cut him for a 4th RB that probably wont see the field nearly as much.

    Originally Posted by: musccy 

    Originally Posted by: steveishere 



    It's not all about physical skills... and that's not why Kuhn has stuck around so long... it's his mental skills and being a jack of all trades with limited to no weakness that have kept him around and the fact coaches and teammates trust him to get his job done.

    Also I remember when questioned who was the back-up to the back-up with Rodgers down and Cobb (I think) out, some reporter came on and said the Packers said Kuhn was the next QB up... and when later asked to explain why Kuhn... (or say Nelson), someone answered Kuhn probably knows the complete offense better than all the non-QBs.

    ( Thinking to myself: ... Yes but how is throwing abilities? ) I thought Nelson would be the next up... but they say Kuhn would be...

    And who knows... the 4th RB, might be able to play STs also... and Packers have had a bigger recent history of RB injured than QBs injured... so maybe 4th RB over 3rd QB?

    At LB, Demovsky mentioned Thomas...never heard of him to be honest and was hoping for Hubbard just because I was so intrigued by his numbers, but maybe he's someone the Packers could effectively stash on the practice squad.

    Originally Posted by: steveishere 



    It sounds like two of the UDFA ILB are showing good potential. Thomas and Doughty... though it sounds like the Packers might be focusing more on OLBers and we might see more 3 OLB and/or 3 Safety packages, which MIGHT mean more 1 ILB on the field... so it will be interesting to see how all that goes with the new scheme changes.

    Also I'm a bit disappointed I haven't heard more from Barrington... I thought he'd make a good jump and I haven't heard much of him.

    UserPostedImage
    DarkaneRules
    10 years ago
    I agree that it is an educated toss up between Palmer and Mulumba outside. I can see a scenario where neither makes the team. I still have hopes for Barrington because I believe the guy has playmaker potential. I hope he shows up when the pre-season games are underway. We have three practices open to the public this week. I will be focusing on hearing what news comes from practice with respect to Barrington.
    Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
    texaspackerbacker
    10 years ago
    Is Demovsky "Packer people"? Or is he just a national media hack? I've seen roster projections by just regular people that seem more believable.

    I don't think we will keep Taylor as a 9th O-Lineman given the overlapping positions of several players and the fact that it just wouldn't be that difficult to replace him from the scrap heap.

    I really think we will keep 6 WRs - he didn't even mention Dorsey who seems to me to be the most likely 5th best, followed by White. Similarly, with TEs, I expect them to find a way to keep 5.
    Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
    If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
    beast
    10 years ago

    Is Demovsky "Packer people"? Or is he just a national media hack? I've seen roster projections by just regular people that seem more believable.

    Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 

    Depends on how you define "Packer people", but if you're asking how long has he covered the Green Bay area, his twitter account answers that... and I think he's covered the Packers for a while now as well.

    And everyone has their own and different opinion on what's "believable"...


    Rob Demovsky
    @RobDemovsky

    ESPN NFL Nation Packers reporter. Have covered sports in Green Bay since 1997.

    Rob Demovsky's twitter account  wrote:



    When you do a 53 man roster you have to make guesses... and everyone is going to guess differently.

    Most teams normally keep 9 OL... and Packers might like Taylor more than you (or me)... as he's getting limited reps with the #1 unit... which is more than Sherrod can say (I think). Why they're doing that, I can't say, but maybe they plan on resting Sitton some during the preseason and see Taylor against the other teams starters? The thing I have against Taylor is that as far as I know, he's their 4th best OG and doesn't back-up C or OT. Not that versatile... Barclay being so versatile might give him a chance though if the keep 9 (assuming Sherrod gets in as the back-up/starter at LT).


    You're expecting the Packers to keep 11 receivers? Which positions are you going to go thin at? You're 53 man roster might be interesting...

    I thought it was going to be a lock with 6 WRs as well, but they have been getting hurt... Abbrederis out... Janis has been ill... I've heard Harper has been VERY inconsistent... I've really like Dorsey and glad I'm not the only one that thinks he could make it. I haven't heard a thing about White this preseason.

    I expect 4 TEs though... Quarless, Bostick and Rodgers... and then the rest competing for one spot with Ryan Taylor having the early edge because of ST work and coaches know (like Kuhn) they can normally count on him not to make mistakes.

    UserPostedImage
    Fan Shout
    beast (23m) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
    beast (23m) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
    Zero2Cool (10h) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
    Zero2Cool (10h) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
    dfosterf (12h) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
    Zero2Cool (13h) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
    dfosterf (14h) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
    Zero2Cool (14h) : Thank you
    wpr (14h) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
    wpr (14h) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
    Zero2Cool (14h) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
    wpr (14h) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
    dfosterf (14h) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
    Zero2Cool (15h) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
    Zero2Cool (15h) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
    Martha Careful (15h) : just kidding...it was down
    Martha Careful (15h) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
    dfosterf (15h) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
    beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
    beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
    beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
    beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
    beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
    wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
    wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
    wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
    Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
    beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
    beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
    beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
    Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
    Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
    packerfanoutwest (21-Jan) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome
    Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.
    Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.
    Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : what's so funny?
    Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
    Eagles
    Recent Topics
    9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    15h / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

    21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.