According to the chart SF would only have to give up the #77 pick to make the deal work. That #94 is a 120 point throw in, and we are already over by 35 pts...

But, HELL YEAH I would take that deal too. I'm just talking about getting two R1 selections, and what it might take to do so, and how feasible it might actually be.

Originally Posted by: play2win 

2nd 3rd and 4th round picks seem pretty valuable to me this year. Teams that usually go back up to get another 1st rounder are ones that have a high 2nd round pick which is not us meaning we'd probably have to give up most of the early/middle of our draft to do it which just doesn't seem worth it for what's potentially available at the end of the 1st, most of those guys just don't seem like players you give up that much for. I don't see the late 1st being significantly stronger than the late 2nd. I mean is haha and mosely really a future 1st, a 2nd and 3rd better than something like haha/Jordan Matthews, haha/Murphy, or Mosely/Bucannon

Originally Posted by: steveishere 

What? How is the 21st overall and 77th overall separated by only 30 points? I am lost here.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

The 56 (340), 61(292) and 77(205) add up to 837 points. The 21 is worth 800.

Why would SF have to throw in the 94? That is what I am wondering.

Originally Posted by: play2win 

Did you ask yourself the same question about the Packers in 2009???



21st overall - 800 points

56th - 340
61st - 292
77th - 205
94th - 124

961 total

161 point swing



The Clay Matthews trade with Patriots

Packers got (726.6)
26th overall - 700
162nd overall - 26.6

Patriots got (890)
41st overall - 490
73rd overall - 225
83rd overall - 175

163.4 point swing

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

Nope. Its no big thing. I see what you did there...

On another note, I see some mocks have both Shazier and Mosley being available at 21, with the player not selected usually going to DEN at 30. What if we took both of them at #20 and #21, or #21 and #22? How cool would that be?

Originally Posted by: play2win 

Hehe...well, since I'd trade down/out of the round if they were the best available, I guess I have to say it wasn't very cool at all. I'd rather have a six picks in the top 100 than spend two firsts on those two. If I couldn't trade down, I'd take one of them as BPA. But no way would I want to spend other picks on the other.

But then again I'm an ....

[ass]

Originally Posted by: Wade 

I'm betting if Pryor is available at 21 Ted takes him, if not, I look for ted to trade down to secure some extra picks.

Going to be interesting to see which of these guys who have graded out as 1st round picks fall into the 2nd rnd.

Other years it might make sense to try and get 2 1st rnd picks, there just seems to be too much talent throughout the draft this year to not take advantage of as many picks as possible.

I could see Ted trading down early, accumulating 3rd, 4th and 5th rnd picks, then using them to trade back up into the 3rd and 4th rnds.

Glad it's finally here, by the end of Saturday night, we all will know what Ted's plan was.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan