DoddPower
11 years ago

Whenever I see stats like this I always wonder why they chose that particular year. Why choose 2010. Why not 2009 or 2008 or 2011?

Of those on the list only the Saints had more wins than the Packers in 2009 so it would look even better for the Packers if they went back to 2009. Can't do 2008 though because we only won 6 games that year.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



Why not choose 1990 or 1972? A specific date has to be picked and in this case it's just meant to be somewhat representative of recent history, I suppose. Perhaps the best thing would be to show multiple time frames for a more complete picture.
mi_keys
11 years ago

Because he's Dhazer and he paints whatever picture he wants. That's just what he does, especially if it somehow lessens any accomplishment the Packers have had, for some reason. Just a real negative guy, I suppose. It probably extends beyond just the NFL.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



I know. I've been here long enough to know he does that. Doesn't mean I don't like pointing out the bullshit.
Born and bred a cheesehead
+1
dhazer
11 years ago

Because he's Dhazer and he paints whatever picture he wants. That's just what he does, especially if it somehow lessens any accomplishment the Packers have had, for some reason. Just a real negative guy, I suppose. It probably extends beyond just the NFL.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 





ok the Packers had a 15 win season in there that throws off the whole thing


10-6
15-1
11-5
8-7-1


Then look at the Pats

14-2
13-3
12-4
12-4

Ummm what team looks more constant? Btw Look at the Pats record back to 2001 when Brady took over. The worst record was 9-7 and only missed the playoffs twice and one of the times they missed the playoffs their record was 11-5 with a backup qb all season.

They average 12.5 wins a year now thats impressive. Even though they did cheat lol
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
reed
mi_keys
11 years ago

ok the Packers had a 15 win season in there that throws off the whole thing


10-6
15-1
11-5
8-7-1


Then look at the Pats

14-2
13-3
12-4
12-4

Ummm what team looks more constant? Btw Look at the Pats record back to 2001 when Brady took over. The worst record was 9-7 and only missed the playoffs twice and one of the times they missed the playoffs their record was 11-5 with a backup qb all season.

They average 12.5 wins a year now thats impressive. Even though they did cheat lol

Originally Posted by: dhazer 



Yeah, and we have an 8 win season in there. The average is 11 and the median is 10.5.

The pats are the exception with their consistency. That's why we still have the second best record over that time period. Now let's win another title this year and make it count for something.
Born and bred a cheesehead
dhazer
11 years ago

Yeah, and we have an 8 win season in there. The average is 11 and the median is 10.5.

The pats are the exception with their consistency. That's why we still have the second best record over that time period. Now let's win another title this year and make it count for something.

Originally Posted by: mi_keys 



Looking at it all and I guess regular season don't mean shit as long as you make the playoffs

going back to the 2008 season the average super bowl winner had 11 wins in the season so i guess we are right on average
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
reed
mi_keys
11 years ago

Looking at it all and I guess regular season don't mean shit as long as you make the playoffs

going back to the 2008 season the average super bowl winner had 11 wins in the season so i guess we are right on average

Originally Posted by: dhazer 



Get in and anything can happen. Especially with the parity in the league these days.
Born and bred a cheesehead
+1
nerdmann
11 years ago

Get in and anything can happen. Especially with the parity in the league these days.

Originally Posted by: mi_keys 



1: Get in.

2: Get a week off.

3: Get a home game.

4: Home field advantage.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
sschind
11 years ago

Why not choose 1990 or 1972? A specific date has to be picked and in this case it's just meant to be somewhat representative of recent history, I suppose. Perhaps the best thing would be to show multiple time frames for a more complete picture.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



Yeah but usually when they make such comments they are trying to make a specific point about something. If they are trying to show the Packers specifically why not do your full research and go back one more year which would make the stats look even better. Maybe he was trying to show the Patriots in a better light so he chose 2010. That's why I said I wonder why he chose that year. You are right though. It could have just been chosen at random.
buckeyepackfan
11 years ago
Composite NFL Standings since the AFL/NFL merger
by organization (not franchise) through team and location changes.
Fall of 1970 through 2/2/2014

http://home.jps.net/~fos/nfl/post1969nfl.html 


Or there is this.

http://home.jps.net/~fos/nfl/nfl.htm 
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
play2win
11 years ago



[list=1]
  • Patriots (51-13)
  • Packers (44-19-1)
  • 49ers (42-21-1)
  • Ravens (42-22)
  • Saints (42-22)
  • Falcons (40-24)
  • Steelers (40-24)[/list]

    Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


    • It is pretty impressive, all things considering. And, as nerdmann said, this with Rodgers being out a significant 6 games last season. Now, to better our playoff record. Maybe that starts this season!
    Similar Topics
    Users browsing this topic
      Fan Shout
      packerfanoutwest (2h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
      Zero2Cool (3h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
      wpr (3h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
      wpr (3h) : now 3
      Zero2Cool (4h) : Who? What?
      beast (13h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
      Martha Careful (17h) : meh
      Zero2Cool (21h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
      Zero2Cool (21h) : It's so awesome.
      Zero2Cool (21h) : new site fan shout post fast
      wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
      wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
      wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
      Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
      dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
      wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
      beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
      wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
      Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
      dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
      dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
      dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
      dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
      Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
      dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
      Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
      dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
      dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
      dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
      dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
      Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
      Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
      Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
      Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
      dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
      dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
      dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
      Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
      Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
      Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
      Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
      dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
      dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
      Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
      dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
      dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
      Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
      dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
      Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
      Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
      Please sign in to use Fan Shout
      2024 Packers Schedule
      Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
      Eagles
      29 - 34
      Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
      COLTS
      16 - 10
      Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
      Titans
      30 - 14
      Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
      VIKINGS
      29 - 31
      Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
      Rams
      24 - 19
      Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
      CARDINALS
      34 - 13
      Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
      TEXANS
      24 - 22
      Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
      Jaguars
      30 - 27
      Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
      LIONS
      14 - 24
      Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
      Bears
      20 - 19
      Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
      49ERS
      38 - 10
      Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
      DOLPHINS
      30 - 17
      Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
      Lions
      31 - 34
      Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
      Seahawks
      30 - 13
      Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
      SAINTS
      34 - 0
      Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
      Vikings
      25 - 27
      Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
      BEARS
      22 - 24
      Recent Topics
      2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

      3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

      15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

      17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

      16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

      13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

      12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

      11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

      2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

      2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

      1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

      1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

      31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

      30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

      29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

      Headlines
      Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.