dfosterf
10 years ago
Sucktitude. I have no reason to post. Wade has me totally covered, lol.

buckeyepackfan
10 years ago
I've been saying it all along, was hoping this year would be different, but always knew that Ted wasn't going to jump into the day1 "money mania" that is NFL FA's

Hell Ted surprised me by paying Sam Shields, it just goes to show he knows which of "his guys" he wants to keep.
The Browns forced his hand and he made sure Sam didn't go anywhere.

Mike Neal was healthy the whole season for the 1st time in his career, switched positions and showed he was versatile enough to play both OLB and D-Line.

Whatever he was payed, well worth it, he is only going to get better.

Ted wasn't going to let all 16 FA's go, that's why all these reports of how much more money The Packers had to spend this year wasn't taking in the whole picture.

Ted could have signed any of those 1st day guys, but then signing Sam Shields may not have been an option.
Or what about Jordy and Randall, they are going to get paid by next year, maybe just maybe Ted is looking ahead, making sure there is money to lock them up.

This nonsense of saying well The Packers are already done for 2014 because Ted didn't sign a day 1 FA is silly.

Daniels , Boyd, Jones, Worthy and now Neal(he will play all over in 2014) is a pretty good start to a young agrresives D-Line, throw in a Jolly Pickett and/or Raji and you add the veteran leadership needed.

Only day 2 you never know still plenty of D-line FA out there getting restless as they sit unemployed.
Ted may yet strike when the price is right.


I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
dfosterf
10 years ago
Do we factor in what he did with the back-up QB situation last year? I do. The man seems asleep at the switch.


It really feels like MANY of us clowns could do at least as good a job as he does, and I mean REALLY.

of course, I personally vote for me.
buckeyepackfan
10 years ago
Well Hell let's get that " FIRE TED THOMPSON" site going again.

I'm versatile, if it's time for a change, then let's get it done!!!!
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
PackFanWithTwins
10 years ago

Of course not.

But if you restrict yourself to players willing to take Mike Neal dollars, you're most likely to get ... Mike Neals.

Which, IMO, offers no significant improvement over the status quo.

Because it *IS* that status quo.

Originally Posted by: Wade 



If we don't sign anybody else, the team is better with Neal than without him.
If we do sign somebody else, the team is better with Neal than without him.

Neal does not get money which will prevent any other signing with the space we have this year.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
dfosterf
10 years ago

Well Hell let's get that " FIRE TED THOMPSON" site going again.

I'm versatile, if it's time for a change, then let's get it done!!!!

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



I prefer the "BITCH ABOUT TED THOMPSON" site, lol



Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
10 years ago

Sucktitude. I have no reason to post. Wade has me totally covered, lol.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



Damn it, Foster, it's good to see you. Please, please, post some more. I need help bashing some sense into the heads of these damn whippersnappers.


And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
10 years ago

Well Hell let's get that " FIRE TED THOMPSON" site going again.

I'm versatile, if it's time for a change, then let's get it done!!!!

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



Nah, we don't need to fire him.

Just hire the Gunny to slap him around a bit so he wakes up and returns to more of his genius moves.

Organizations bring in "motivational consultants" all the time, after all.




And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
QCHuskerFan
10 years ago

Do we factor in what he did with the back-up QB situation last year? I do. The man seems asleep at the switch.


It really feels like MANY of us clowns could do at least as good a job as he does, and I mean REALLY.

of course, I personally vote for me.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



Actually, Ted Thompson signed a FA to be our Backup QB last year. He was old. He got hurt. Who knows how good he might have been because he was old and got hurt. Clearly, signing FA's is the solution...
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
play2win
10 years ago

Actually, Ted Thompson signed a FA to be our Backup QB last year. He was old. He got hurt. Who knows how good he might have been because he was old and got hurt. Clearly, signing FA's is the solution...

Originally Posted by: QCHuskerFan 



Clearly, signing 3rd tier FAs is the solution... That is BS.

Sign some freaking talent for Christ's sakes!
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (15m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (24m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (36m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (5h) : Packers will get in
beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
12m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.