Brad Jones can cover. He's also got versatility to play OLB if needed. This staff LOVES versatility.
Originally Posted by: nerdmann
IMO he is versatile in his mediocrity only.
He's serviceable as a backup. He isn't what I want in a starter linebacker. On the other hand, I grew up watching a team whose
weakest starting LB was Lee Roy Caffey. Whose
weakest starting DL was Bob Brown. Whose
weakest starting DB was Dom Brown.
If the Packers had the 2014 equivalent of Caffey, Brown, and Brown quality at all defensive positions, with no Hall of Famer/All Pro types at all, they'd be head and shoulders above the current Packer defense in putting fear into the minds of opposing teams.
One could say the same thing of an OL whose starting players were no better than the 2014 equivalent of Bob Skoronski.
That's why I bitch so much. Forget about all the Hall of Famers. The current OL and defense are, IMO not up to the standards of the
weaker parts of the Lombardi era teams.
IMO.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)