wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
11 years ago

Green Bay --- So maybe T.J. Lang will play after all.

JSOnline Blog  wrote:



it takes the play of Newhouse to make Lang look good.
UserPostedImage
steveishere
11 years ago
No it doesn't. Lang has been great this season.
DakotaT
11 years ago
Barclay is the weak link on our O-line this year. He has done an admirable job, but is definitely not our future at RT. At best he will make a fine utility lineman.

I'm looking forward to training camp next season because I think both tackle positions should be up for grabs as well as center. Only Lang and Sitton should be penciled in as starts. I really think Bahktiari should start, but I'm not convinced it should be at Left Tackle when we have 2 injured players with higher pedigree coming back. Peppers did have a big game against David after all.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
11 years ago
According to PFF

Tackle ratings out of 39 that have played 75% snaps
Don Barclay 29th
David Bakhtiari 35th


Guard ratings out of 41 that have played 75% snaps
Josh Sitton 3rd (Daryn Colledge isn't far behind in the ratings...hmm no surprise here!)
T.J. Lang 14th


Center ratings out of 24 that have played 75% snaps
Evan Dietrich-Smith 11th
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
11 years ago

According to PFF

Tackle ratings out of 39 that have played 75% snaps
Don Barclay 29th
David Bakhtiari 35th


Guard ratings out of 41 that have played 75% snaps
Josh Sitton 3rd (Daryn Colledge isn't far behind in the ratings...hmm no surprise here!)
T.J. Lang 14th


Center ratings out of 24 that have played 75% snaps
Evan Dietrich-Smith 11th

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I know you're a big stats guy and all, but tell me Einstein, who missed the block that landed our all universe quarterback on the inactive list? Did you happen to watch the effort given on that blocking assignment?
UserPostedImage
steveishere
11 years ago

I know you're a big stats guy and all, but tell me Einstein, who missed the block that landed our all universe quarterback on the inactive list? Did you happen to watch the effort given on that blocking assignment?

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Nobody missed "that block" Barclay gave Rodgers a clean pocket on that play he doesn't know Rodgers is running up there. That injury is 100% on Rodgers misjudging his athletic ability, he got run down from behind. It wasn't poor effort from Barclay because he was sitting back on his heels to keep the pocket clean. Barclay hasn't been very good lately at all and the reason his "score" is higher than Bakhtiari is run blocking. They have equal scores in pass blocking and Bakhtiari has faced much tougher match ups so his pass blocking over all has actually been much better. The hit that injured Rodgers however has nothing to do with Barclay's blocking putting that on him is lame.
DakotaT
11 years ago

Nobody missed "that block" Barclay gave Rodgers a clean pocket on that play he doesn't know Rodgers is running up there. That injury is 100% on Rodgers misjudging his athletic ability, he got run down from behind. It wasn't poor effort from Barclay because he was sitting back on his heels to keep the pocket clean. Barclay hasn't been very good lately at all and the reason his "score" is higher than Bakhtiari is run blocking. They have equal scores in pass blocking and Bakhtiari has faced much tougher match ups so his pass blocking over all has actually been much better. The hit that injured Rodgers however has nothing to do with Barclay's blocking putting that on him is lame.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



🙄

So you can't finish off a block, because you did your job providing a pocket. Barclay's man was McClellun, who kept playing when Barclay decided his job was over.
UserPostedImage
steveishere
11 years ago

🙄

So you can't finish off a block, because you did your job providing a pocket. Barclay's man was McClellun, who kept playing when Barclay decided his job was over.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



You don't "finish off a block" pass blocking you hold your spot and provide a clean pocket. If a guy lets off on his bull rush you let him. Rodgers ran out of that pocket too close to the Bears player and wasn't fast enough to get away from him. Barclay's job wasn't to drive the defender backwards it was to keep him from collapsing the pocket.

[duh]
DarkaneRules
11 years ago
I don't know about the majority of fans, but I definitely put the Rodgers injury on his shoulders alone. But it happened and we need to get past it now and rally behind Wallace and our team
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
buckeyepackfan
11 years ago

You don't "finish off a block" pass blocking you hold your spot and provide a clean pocket. If a guy lets off on his bull rush you let him. Rodgers ran out of that pocket too close to the Bears player and wasn't fast enough to get away from him. Barclay's job wasn't to drive the defender backwards it was to keep him from collapsing the pocket.

[duh]

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



Steveis here....give it up, there are some on this forum who come here just to argue, they will never be wrong, no matter how obvious the play was.

They are better at coaching and better at being the GM(in their minds), than what the Packers currently have.

They know everything there is about football, and are never going to admit they are wrong.

Barclay's only option at the time, after he finished his assignment was to grab ahold of the defender and hold.

Barclay had done his job forcing the man back beyond Aaron, his back was turned to Aaron when he broke the pocket and started to scramble, the defender who was facing Aaron saw this and did his job by changing directions and pursuing. Barclay's momentum had him going the other way, his only option would have been to grab the guy and hold, but considering the fact that Aaron has been real successful in scrambling he let the guy go.

Bad break, when he made the tackle, but of course some will blame Barclay for this play 5 years from now, only remembering this one play and use it as a standard when talking about Barclay.

I'm sure if Barclay could have known in advance the results of the play, that he would have held his man and taken the 10yd penalty. But unlike some on here he doesn't know what is going to happen until it actually plays out.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (3h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (9h) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (14h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (23h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
11h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.