all_about_da_packers
16 years ago

Perhaps by the end of the week, coach Mike McCarthy will decide whether to dump Bob Sanders or give him another shot to coordinate the Green Bay Packers defense next season.

But on Sunday, two members of the starting defense made public pleas, not for or against Sanders, but rather for General Manager Ted Thompson to use free agency to bolster a defense that will finish in the bottom third of the NFL and had as much to do with the Packers 6-10 record as anything else.

Sure, the defense made critical fourth-quarter stops to help secure Sundays 31-21 victory over the winless Detroit Lions at Lambeau Field.

But anything that happened on the field other than the victory itself can be discounted as virtually meaningless because it happened against a Lions outfit that became the first NFL team to lose all 16 regular-season games.

In my opinion, we have to get some veteran guys on the team, some guys that have weathered some storms in their careers and know what its all about, Packers cornerback Charles Woodson said. I dont know what will be done, but I know there will be some things done.

I think we need a couple of more (veterans on defense). A couple more and I think well be OK.

Fellow starting cornerback Al Harris agreed.

We are a young team, but thats no excuse, Harris said. Theres going to be some guys out there that may (be able to) help us.

Making a large splash in free agency isnt Thompsons mantra. He long has preferred to build through the draft, but he has gone the free-agent route in the past. After the Packers 4-12 season of 2005, Thompson signed Woodson, defensive tackle Ryan Pickett and safety Marquand Manuel to lucrative free-agent contracts. Woodson and Pickett worked out; Manuel did not.

For his part, Woodson said while hes at the Pro Bowl in February, he would lobby any potential free agents to consider the Packers.

Though the Packers starting cornerbacks were vocal about their desire to see Thompson add veteran players to the roster, neither was willing to say much about Sanders, whose job security appears shaky after a season in which the defense failed to hold multiple fourth-quarter leads.

Asked whether he would bring Sanders back, Woodson said: I wont answer that.

Harris, when asked the same question, said: However it works out, it works out.

Several other defensive players, including linebacker A.J. Hawk and Pickett, defended Sanders, saying the problems on defense were more about execution and injuries to key players like Nick Barnett, Atari Bigby and Cullen Jenkins than about the scheme.

The schemes been working for us the last couple of years, Pickett said. It wasnt the scheme.

Sanders refused to address his future on Sunday, saying his sole focus was on beating the Lions. His defense gave up 316 yards and three touchdowns but came up with two turnovers.

Our guys played hard, for the most part, Sanders said. I think the effort was good, and the mental aspect of what we were trying to get done was good. The efforts been good. Our guys come to play. Mike does a great job with that as far as getting our guys ready to go and getting the team mentally in position to fight every week. When we evaluate (the season), thatll be one thing well see is that the guys fought hard every week, and thats a credit to Mike and his leadership.

McCarthy didnt address any potential staff changes in his postgame news conference other than to say he planned to spend today and Tuesday conducting exit interviews with the players, and then from there, Ill move on to the coaches, he said.

McCarthy is scheduled to conduct his season-ending media conference at 9 a.m. Wednesday.




Interesting. I fount it odd that Woodson chose not to comment on bringing Sanders back.

[humor] Well Ted, C-Murder (Woodson) has spoken. Woodson is the new Jennings, so unless you want your head "blowed" up, best do as he says. Sign some big name UFAs this year, seriously! :shaking2:
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
slaket
16 years ago
No kidding. Our defense is lacking depth of any kind. We need some quality players and we need them ASAP
It is was it is
blueleopard
16 years ago
Well that puts the Packers in a weird spot.

Charles Woodson and Al Harris are THE leaders of the defense. And they both have plainly said in black and white that they want more veterans on the team.

Brett Favre was THE leader of the team, and he plainly said in black and white that he wanted Randy Moss.

We'll see what happens.
Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings
RainX
16 years ago
Thompson doesn't have to break the bank on several pricey Free Agents. If he can land a Haynesworth caliber player and maybe another cheaper guy or two for depth and have a solid draft, I'd consider that a solid off-season.
blank
TengoJuego
16 years ago
We have now a fine QB to lead our offense, We found a few standouts on D with Nick Collins, and Tramon Williams. A great punt returner in Will Blackmon. And I will be very excited to see Jordy Nelson eventually develop into our dirty work WR and ultimately become Driver's replacement. I really think this team needs a much better TE. Donald Lee has done good things, we could have a much better receiver. Maybe this can be addressed in the offseason. Maybe Tony G will come play for us who knows.

Now as far as the attacking the FA market(everyone seems to want Peppers and Haynesworth) I like the idea, I just don't know that I want it to happen. What I mean is, will Ted Thompson pursue the right guy for the team? Or the best player available? Is the best player available the best for the team?
blueleopard
16 years ago

We have now a fine QB to lead our offense, We found a few standouts on D with Nick Collins, and Tramon Williams. A great punt returner in Will Blackmon. And I will be very excited to see Jordy Nelson eventually develop into our dirty work WR and ultimately become Driver's replacement. I really think this team needs a much better TE. Donald Lee has done good things, we could have a much better receiver. Maybe this can be addressed in the offseason. Maybe Tony G will come play for us who knows.

"TengoJuego" wrote:



I was actually gonna make a thread about the TE, but I don't know.

The thing with Donald Lee was that Rodgers didn't take too many looks at the middle this season. When he started to grow in the offense, he then took more looks in the middle--which led to a strong increase in the production of both Donald Lee and Donald Driver--who is always making the dangerous, underneath receptions.

That being said, the TE position is solid, and can only get better, but there's no harm in continuing to address it either.

How do we go about it?

Look back to Week 6. Ted Thompson offered a 3rd rounder for the services of one Tony Gonzalez. Kansas City's General Manager, Carl Peterson, refused--asking for a 2nd. Thompson isn't that stupid, but Peterson is. Now that Peterson is fired, maybe Thompson can go that route one more time? Especially now that he has an extra third round pick from the Favre trade.

But either way you look at it. One player stood out in today's game. That was Jermichael Finley. If he can make the same two receptions at a consistent rate, Tight End wouldn't even be a need for the Packers.

Finley is going to be someone.
Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings
all_about_da_packers
16 years ago

How do we go about it?

Look back to Week 6. Ted Thompson offered a 3rd rounder for the services of one Tony Gonzalez. Kansas City's General Manager, Carl Peterson, refused--asking for a 2nd. Thompson isn't that stupid, but Peterson is. Now that Peterson is fired, maybe Thompson can go that route one more time? Especially now that he has an extra third round pick from the Favre trade.

But either way you look at it. One player stood out in today's game. That was Jermichael Finley. If he can make the same two receptions at a consistent rate, Tight End wouldn't even be a need for the Packers.

Finley is going to be someone.

"blueleopard" wrote:



Kill two birds with one stone: get a great TE to help the development of Finley (I agree, he's got tremendous potential) while also getting a veteran leader that Woodson and Harris talked about.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
longtimefan
16 years ago
this is really interesting..

many people believe that Ted refused to go get free agents just to piss Brett off and make him retire sooner..

Now what if Ted doesnt listen to Woodson or Harris and stays away once again..

Does the theory end that not getting free agents was to run Brett out of town?
slaket
16 years ago

this is really interesting..

many people believe that Ted refused to go get free agents just to piss Brett off and make him retire sooner..

Now what if Ted doesnt listen to Woodson or Harris and stays away once again..

Does the theory end that not getting free agents was to run Brett out of town?

"longtimefan" wrote:



I think Ted just hates signing FA's that's all. It's much cheaper to have a bunch of draft picks on the team instead.
It is was it is
TengoJuego
16 years ago

But either way you look at it. One player stood out in today's game. That was Jermichael Finley. If he can make the same two receptions at a consistent rate, Tight End wouldn't even be a need for the Packers.

Finley is going to be someone.

"blueleopard" wrote:



I'm still not sold on Finley. He played well today. But has performed poorly in similar plays earlier in the season. Having a hard working, sure-handed, veteran TE in Tony G would be great. I don't think we should cough up a large amount of money for him, or give up anything more than our extra 3rd round pick. But man I really think, if still wanting out or KC wiling to deal, we should pursue him.

Is Tony a FA this offseason?
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Mucky Tundra (42m) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
    packerfanoutwest (6h) : Feliz Navidad!
    Zero2Cool (11h) : Merry Christmas!
    beast (19h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
    beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
    Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
    Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
    buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
    buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
    Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
    Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
    beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
    beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
    beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
    beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    8h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    23h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

    24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

    24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.