Because Finley is the Packers starting TE and that is why any talk of the Packers and a TE should involve Finley.
Originally Posted by: sschind
If that's true, then you would be a hypocrite because you talk had talk of the Packers and a WR and didn't involve the Packers starting WRs. But I think it's more likely you thought I was insulting Finley and went into defense mode.
I would absolutely love to see Gordon in Green Bay and if all it would take would be a second rounder it would be a steal.
Originally Posted by: sschind
Your group sounds good but I would prefer Nelson, Cobb, Jones, Finley and Lacy and that is who we have so we don't need Gonzo.
Originally Posted by: sschind
Just because someone perfers something doesn't mean there is no need for something else. For example, I perfer a shut down CB, but that doesn't mean the Packers don't need an upgrade at Safety to go with Burnett.
If Mike McCarthy loves his TEs so much why don't we see more of them on the field or more of them getting involved.
Originally Posted by: sschind
Because they're not talented enough when compared to the other players (WRs/RBs)
I don't believe that the only reason our backup TEs don't have more catches is because they are not good enough.
Originally Posted by: sschind
See you already had the answer and used it try to defend your point of veiw. But lets be honest the back-up TEs aren't that good other than maybe Quarless and he has a problem with catching the ball.
If I have a crush on Finley I wonder what that says about your feelings towards Gonzo.
Originally Posted by: sschind
It says nothing, because I haven't gotten defensive and then attack someone idea over Gonzo. That's because there was no reason to, because no one has said anything bad about Gonzo here (just like no one has said anything bad about Finley here).
But even if people do say bad things about Gonzo, I can handle it because they'll probably be right, he's old, very well could be retiring after this season.