macbob
16 years ago
Here's two predictions:

1) Packers are quiet in the FA market again next year, with Thompson hoarding money to sign some of the 2010 guys.

2) Jennings gets traded ala Corey Williams after negotiations convince Thompson his cost too high.
dingus
16 years ago
Corey Williams cost was to high
blank
macbob
16 years ago

Corey Williams cost was to high

"dingus" wrote:



For what he finally signed at, I agree. We could have used the franchise tag on him, which would not have been an unreasonable cost.

No, I'm not knocking the trade of Williams, I just wouldn't be surprised to see Jennings go the same way.
Nonstopdrivel
16 years ago
Are you predicting this to happen before or after the draft? I doubt Thompson would trade Jennings away without having first drafted a viable young prospect. From what I see, this draft class isn't exactly rich in elite receivers, so this seems like a dicey proposition.

On the other hand, I agree that Thompson won't risk putting this team into salary cap hell for one player. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
Cheesey
16 years ago

Here's two predictions:

1) Packers are quiet in the FA market again next year, with Thompson hoarding money to sign some of the 2010 guys.

2) Jennings gets traded ala Corey Williams after negotiations convince Thompson his cost too high.

"macbob" wrote:


Jennings won't be allowed to leave. He's WAY too talented. Ted Thompson won't let him go.
And if he does, i'll be the first to utter those famous words......"FIRE TT!!!"LOLOL!!!

go.pack.go.
16 years ago

Corey Williams cost was to high

"macbob" wrote:



For what he finally signed at, I agree. We could have used the franchise tag on him, which would not have been an unreasonable cost.

No, I'm not knocking the trade of Williams, I just wouldn't be surprised to see Jennings go the same way.

"dingus" wrote:



The thing about that is, we DID use the franchise tag on him, and then we traded him.

Greg Jennings is one of my favorite players on this team. And he's on of our best players on this team. I don't see Ted Thompson letting him go, and if he does, he should be fired the second that he does it.
macbob
16 years ago

Corey Williams cost was to high

"go.pack.go." wrote:



For what he finally signed at, I agree. We could have used the franchise tag on him, which would not have been an unreasonable cost.

No, I'm not knocking the trade of Williams, I just wouldn't be surprised to see Jennings go the same way.

"macbob" wrote:



The thing about that is, we DID use the franchise tag on him, and then we traded him.

Greg Jennings is one of my favorite players on this team. And he's on of our best players on this team. I don't see Ted Thompson letting him go, and if he does, he should be fired the second that he does it.

"dingus" wrote:



Thompson has shown a tendency to set a value on a player (which often appears to be below market value) and to not pay above that value. There's a great potential that a bidding war for Jennings to exceed that value. Our only hope, in my opinion, is to give him enough money up front (2009) to make it worth his while to sign a year early for less overall than he'd make in 2010. His salary this year is the minimum salary for a 3rd year player ($535K, with no bonuses).

Unfortunately, based on past performance (Javon Walker, Williams, etc) I would not be surprised at all to see Jennings traded for draft picks (assuming Thompson can find a trading partner willing to meet his asking price). With Jones, Nelson, Martin (and Driver, though I'm not sure how many years he has left), Thompson may feel he can draft a decent, cheaper receiver or two and save the $$.
Rockmolder
16 years ago

Corey Williams cost was to high

"macbob" wrote:



For what he finally signed at, I agree. We could have used the franchise tag on him, which would not have been an unreasonable cost.

No, I'm not knocking the trade of Williams, I just wouldn't be surprised to see Jennings go the same way.

"go.pack.go." wrote:



The thing about that is, we DID use the franchise tag on him, and then we traded him.

Greg Jennings is one of my favorite players on this team. And he's on of our best players on this team. I don't see Ted Thompson letting him go, and if he does, he should be fired the second that he does it.

"macbob" wrote:



Thompson has shown a tendency to set a value on a player (which often appears to be below market value) and to not pay above that value. There's a great potential that a bidding war for Jennings to exceed that value. Our only hope, in my opinion, is to give him enough money up front (2009) to make it worth his while to sign a year early for less overall than he'd make in 2010. His salary this year is the minimum salary for a 3rd year player ($535K, with no bonuses).

Unfortunately, based on past performance (Javon Walker, Williams, etc) I would not be surprised at all to see Jennings traded for draft picks (assuming Thompson can find a trading partner willing to meet his asking price). With Jones, Nelson, Martin (and Driver, though I'm not sure how many years he has left), Thompson may feel he can draft a decent, cheaper receiver or two and save the $$.

"dingus" wrote:



Walker was totally different though, he was after the money, complained a whole lot and eventually ended up on IR that season, before being traded to the Broncos.

I do indeed hope that he will throw enough money at Jennings to keep him here. He's one of the up and coming players on this team. This is what you draft for imo, to get good young players. If you keep trading away these guys, there's no way we'll ever become a really good team.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (11h) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (15h) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (15h) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16h) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16h) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16h) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16h) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16h) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16h) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16h) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16h) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16h) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (17h) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (17h) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (17h) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (17h) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (19h) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (19h) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (19h) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
5h / Random Babble / bboystyle

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.