Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
11 years ago
More fodder to discuss..

DEFENSIVE COORDINATOR DOM CAPERS 

1. What adjustments needed to be made -- or were made, but didn't work -- as 49ers wide receiver Anquan Boldin was on his way to a 13-catch, 208-yard game?

CAPERS: We had some double calls in there. As a matter of fact, two of his catches -- the touchdown pass, we had a double on him and he just beat the double, and the very first third down of the second half, we had them to third-and-9 and we had a double call on him and that's when I think it was a 22-yarder on a 7 route. So, it wasn't like we didn't have things up and ready. We just didn't execute with the kind of efficiency you need to against a veteran receiver that's been doing that for a long time. He's a good physical receiver, and we felt that we might need to double him at times, but when we did we really didn't do a real good job of it.

2. Colin Kaepernick beat you mostly with his legs in the playoff game eight months ago, now he did it entirely with his arm. What makes Kaepernick better -- or different -- as a mobile quarterback?

CAPERS: I think he can do both. He obviously has a strong arm. And those guys that can buy time, they give those vertical receivers more time to work up the field. They've got (Vernon) Davis, who's a rare guy because he's probably the fastest guy on their team as a tight end. So they're always seeking to try to get that matchup with him inside on a linebacker. You'd see when they'd empty out and go to no backs, he was normally in line as one of those inside receivers trying to get a match-up on a linebacker. So it's a combination of their speed to get vertical and Kaepernick's ability to buy time to let those routes develop.

3. When did you make the decision to put Johnny Jolly in as a starter in the base 3-4 defense for this game?

CAPERS: I think we will have a combination of guys. I don't know we really have a starting end right now. Johnny played a number of snaps yesterday, but I think if you look at our rotation we played – C.J. (Wilson) had a number of snaps, Mike Daniels had a number of snaps. We're going to need all those guys to play for us because you have days like (Sunday) when it's warm and you have to keep rotating so guys don't get worn out. We had an awful lot of plays and the type of game it was, we were probably in our Okie defense more than what we normally are because they were in two tight ends, two backs and regular personnel with two wide receivers and two backs for most of the game. We probably played maybe as little sub (in Sunday's game) as we've played for awhile.


"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
11 years ago
Another question- For the past several years GB has been poor at best when it comes to closing out a series. They showed this weakness again against SF.

3rd down efficiency GB 4-10 SF 9-18
4th down efficiency GB 0-0 SF 1-1

What are you going to do to stop the opposition drives before they score and get the defense off the field?
UserPostedImage
StoicFire
11 years ago

Another question- For the past several years GB has been poor at best when it comes to closing out a series. They showed this weakness again against SF.

3rd down efficiency GB 4-10 SF 9-18
4th down efficiency GB 0-0 SF 1-1

What are you going to do to stop the opposition drives before they score and get the defense off the field?

Originally Posted by: wpr 



I'm just a fan like everyone else here, not a coach, but from my chair at home I thought the defensive gameplan looked really good. It was the execution that was inconsistent.

At times I was wildly impressed. Kaepernick never seemed to have any scrambling lanes. The defensive front did a great job of maintaining lane discipline and holding at the point of attack on almost every play, I thought. Our front seven seemed to be everywhere, and I loved watching them swarm.

The secondary seemed back and forth though. The safeties appeared to be playing a little cautiously, as if they were really concerned about not getting beat deep. Which I understand, but it often meant they couldn't get down to help the corners on time on short routes and in zone. The coverage from the DBs seemed pretty tight actually, it was just that nobody made the big play. I feel like we missed Hayward, and really missed Burnett, but that's not a good excuse. I wish that someone in the secondary would have stepped up, been a hero, and made a game changing play on a ball in the air.

Anyway, I guess what I'm saying, is I'm not placing the blame on Capers. We just didn't quite get it done on the field.
"the Quarterback can run if he wants to, but with this rocket attached to your body... who would?" -Aaron Rodgers
DakotaT
11 years ago

I'm just a fan like everyone else here, not a coach, but from my chair at home I thought the defensive gameplan looked really good. It was the execution that was inconsistent.

At times I was wildly impressed. Kaepernick never seemed to have any scrambling lanes. The defensive front did a great job of maintaining lane discipline and holding at the point of attack on almost every play, I thought. Our front seven seemed to be everywhere, and I loved watching them swarm.

The secondary seemed back and forth though. The safeties appeared to be playing a little cautiously, as if they were really concerned about not getting beat deep. Which I understand, but it often meant they couldn't get down to help the corners on time on short routes and in zone. The coverage from the DBs seemed pretty tight actually, it was just that nobody made the big play. I feel like we missed Hayward, and really missed Burnett, but that's not a good excuse. I wish that someone in the secondary would have stepped up, been a hero, and made a game changing play on a ball in the air.

Anyway, I guess what I'm saying, is I'm not placing the blame on Capers. We just didn't quite get it done on the field.

Originally Posted by: StoicFire 



We have no use for this kind of reasonability in this forum after a loss until at least Thursday. Please join the piss and moan club which posts heavily Sunday evening through Wednesday. [grin1]

Good post, I'd applaud you 5 points if our Nazi leaders would allow it.


UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
11 years ago

I'm just a fan like everyone else here, not a coach, but from my chair at home I thought the defensive gameplan looked really good. It was the execution that was inconsistent.

At times I was wildly impressed. Kaepernick never seemed to have any scrambling lanes. The defensive front did a great job of maintaining lane discipline and holding at the point of attack on almost every play, I thought. Our front seven seemed to be everywhere, and I loved watching them swarm.

The secondary seemed back and forth though. The safeties appeared to be playing a little cautiously, as if they were really concerned about not getting beat deep. Which I understand, but it often meant they couldn't get down to help the corners on time on short routes and in zone. The coverage from the DBs seemed pretty tight actually, it was just that nobody made the big play. I feel like we missed Hayward, and really missed Burnett, but that's not a good excuse. I wish that someone in the secondary would have stepped up, been a hero, and made a game changing play on a ball in the air.

Anyway, I guess what I'm saying, is I'm not placing the blame on Capers. We just didn't quite get it done on the field.

Originally Posted by: StoicFire 




I am not trying to blame Capers. I understand he can draw up the best game plan there is and it is up the the players to execute the plan. Nevertheless the defense allowed too many first downs and I would like to know how he, as the coach in charge of these men, would handle the situation. Change defensive tactics to try and hide the weakness of the players? Coach them differently and have them take more chances? Say there is nothing wrong and keep doing the same for a few more years? Go out and get new players in next years draft to take the place of the ones he has?

Keep in mind I am not speaking only about the SF game. My post mentioned that the Packers defense has had this problem for several years. So it much more than the 4 or 5 db that were on the field Sunday afternoon.

UserPostedImage
Cheesey
11 years ago
Wayne said what also bothers me.
I have seen so many times where the Packer defense (not just this season, but for many) has done a good job on 1st and 2nd down, then give up a 1st down on 3rd down.
If you can't get the other team's O off the field, you won't win many games, or make it far in the playoffs. (See our 15-1 season)
UserPostedImage
StoicFire
11 years ago

We have no use for this kind of reasonability in this forum after a loss until at least Thursday. Please join the piss and moan club which posts heavily Sunday evening through Wednesday. [grin1]

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Hahaha. My bad. I'll have to save such posts for later in the week.

Why does our defense always struggle in big games?! Why cant we be the Niners?! Panic!
](*,)
"the Quarterback can run if he wants to, but with this rocket attached to your body... who would?" -Aaron Rodgers
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
11 years ago
If I was going to critique Capers and staff at all, is they seem to have exotic packages and plays for everything.. even when inserting young players into critical situation.

At times.. the Monte Kiffin school of thought might be better.. the KISS equation. Keep it Simple Stupid.

By having exotic coverage packages behind exotic blitz packages.. there is bound to be communications or read mistakes leading to blown assignments. When Boldin splits a coverage untouched, there either is a player lapse or a scheme "hole".. and as a fan we know not what the cause just it looks horrible.

That there, I think leads to the "Piss and Moan" club comments.. and the this defense sucks donkey nu...



"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
PackFanWithTwins
11 years ago
When our defense has been good, it has been becuase we get to the QB. We didn't againts SF for the most part. We MUST be able to get pressure on the QB or it doesn't matter who the secondary is.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (3h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (3h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Rude!
beast (8h) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (11h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (14h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (15h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.