I can analyze the numbers til I'm blue in the face lol, but which feels faster? If all my statistics say they are identical, but for the people using it, it is sluggish or slow ... then those numbers didn't really help much.
I guess, basically, does the page loading (which that's not accurate either, that's not the actual page load because it doesn't include the site.Master page) does the page loading 0.305 seconds make the page less enjoyable than if were to load at 0.144 seconds?
Do both sites feel similar, acceptable or is there a noticeable difference (slower or faster) between them?
Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool