AP and Calvin Johnson flirted with all time records.
Manning had a comeback year, and would have been MVP as a result, if it wasn't for AP's historical comeback season.
As for Brady? meh.
JJ Watt maybe, just being that the Niners swept us.
I'm not gonna get all huffy about it. Whatever.
Originally Posted by: nerdmann
That's the problem with the list. Everyone is using different criteria. Is it based on the best stats for a single season, or the best player in the NFL that gives their team the best chance to win games? Or all time performance? To me, it's the best player in the league, not the best stats. Who cares what kind of season Calvin Johnson had. What did it mean, ultimately? A shitty record and a top draft pick. Somehow the Vikings were able to win a good bit of games, and Adrian Peterson deserves to be very high, perhaps even number 2. But the purpose of the sport is to win games, and if I had to pick one player that would give me the best chance of doing so throughout an entire season, it would be Aaron Rodgers, without a doubt.
If Arodge wants to be #1 again, maybe he'll stop stat whoring and win another Superbowl.
Originally Posted by: nerdmann
So by that logic, what the hell is Peterson, Manning, Brady, etc. doing in front of Aaron Rodgers? They certainly put up big stats and didn't win a super bowl last season. Often your posts reflect the intellectual capacity of a slow 4th grader.