DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
11 years ago
Nothing is worse than the pack of Neocon wolves that run around in Packerhome.

At least you guys don't have mountain lions roaming around 1/2 mile from your houses. I don't mind the coyotes, but mountain lions bring a little fear.
UserPostedImage
texaspackerbacker
11 years ago
Isn't nature wonderful! Down here, the coyotes bring their packs up from the south and chow down on our welfare benefits.

Dulak, shame on you for trying to stir up anti-Muslim sentiment hahahaha.

Pack of Neocons, huh, Dakota? Seems like the Prime Example of that glorious species is mostly a Lone Wolf around here. What exactly is a "Neocon" anyway? Perhaps you could explain that.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
11 years ago

Isn't nature wonderful! Down here, the coyotes bring their packs up from the south and chow down on our welfare benefits.

Dulak, shame on you for trying to stir up anti-Muslim sentiment hahahaha.

Pack of Neocons, huh, Dakota? Seems like the Prime Example of that glorious species is mostly a Lone Wolf around here. What exactly is a "Neocon" anyway? Perhaps you could explain that.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



What once were normal conservative people that turned into psychopaths when the black man took office. You're all fucking nutz.
UserPostedImage
texaspackerbacker
11 years ago

What once were normal conservative people that turned into psychopaths when the black man took office. You're all fucking nutz.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Well, that lets me out - I was crazy long before that hahahahaha. Besides, I'm all for the idea of a black guy in the White House - as long as his name is Alan Keyes.

Actually, "Neocon" is what the Tea Party types call the more mainstream pragmatic conservatives. By that definition, I suppose I am closer than some, but not exactly either.

Dakota, seriously, you ought to consider what exactly you are for and against, then analyze exactly who strays the farthest and who comes the closest to your own views - assuming your attention span can handle something like that. You might just change your tune about leftists, even if you continue your unwarranted negativity about the good guys.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
11 years ago
Texas, I actually believe in a lot of conservative values. The problem I have is that the people that currently represent the conservatives are nothing but the spoiled offspring of rich people, who I consider very clueless people, and hardly hard working people that earned their life. The Dubya Bush era was the final straw for me. Bankrupting our country to finish off Daddy's fuckup is something I cannot forgive.

When the conservatives actually start picking men or women that represent middle class conservative values in Washington, and not just giving tax breaks to the wealthy, I'll consider voting for them again. Putting up a man like Mittens Romney as the nominee for the Republicans was appalling. You realize in my personal life I am a union millwright, a business owner, and in the winter for shits and giggles, I do taxes for an accounting firm. I'm about as diversified politically as it gets. I will always have conflicts in how I vote. But I just can't blindly follow the Republican party because I am a relatively conservative person. I find so much wrong with their agenda, because they are hardly the "good guys". We are all the good guys who are being taken advantage of.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
11 years ago

Nothing is worse than the pack of Neocon wolves that run around in Packerhome.

At least you guys don't have mountain lions roaming around 1/2 mile from your houses. I don't mind the coyotes, but mountain lions bring a little fear.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Packerhome.com is available for almost $2,000.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
11 years ago

Packerhome.com is available for almost $2,000.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Right now it's free, and no responsibility. But we love you man.
UserPostedImage
Formo
11 years ago

Texas, I actually believe in a lot of conservative values. The problem I have is that the people that currently represent the conservatives are nothing but the spoiled offspring of rich people, who I consider very clueless people, and hardly hard working people that earned their life. The Dubya Bush era was the final straw for me. Bankrupting our country to finish off Daddy's fuckup is something I cannot forgive.

When the conservatives actually start picking men or women that represent middle class conservative values in Washington, and not just giving tax breaks to the wealthy, I'll consider voting for them again. Putting up a man like Mittens Romney as the nominee for the Republicans was appalling.
You realize in my personal life I am a union millwright, a business owner, and in the winter for shits and giggles, I do taxes for an accounting firm. I'm about as diversified politically as it gets. I will always have conflicts in how I vote. But I just can't blindly follow the Republican party because I am a relatively conservative person. I find so much wrong with their agenda, because they are hardly the "good guys". We are all the good guys who are being taken advantage of.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Bolded the parts where I absolutely agree with you.

Holy shit. We agree on something politically?!

Stop the planet, I want off!
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
texaspackerbacker
11 years ago

Texas, I actually believe in a lot of conservative values. The problem I have is that the people that currently represent the conservatives are nothing but the spoiled offspring of rich people, who I consider very clueless people, and hardly hard working people that earned their life. The Dubya Bush era was the final straw for me. Bankrupting our country to finish off Daddy's fuckup is something I cannot forgive.

When the conservatives actually start picking men or women that represent middle class conservative values in Washington, and not just giving tax breaks to the wealthy, I'll consider voting for them again. Putting up a man like Mittens Romney as the nominee for the Republicans was appalling. You realize in my personal life I am a union millwright, a business owner, and in the winter for shits and giggles, I do taxes for an accounting firm. I'm about as diversified politically as it gets. I will always have conflicts in how I vote. But I just can't blindly follow the Republican party because I am a relatively conservative person. I find so much wrong with their agenda, because they are hardly the "good guys". We are all the good guys who are being taken advantage of.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



OMG I actually agree with some of what you wrote also hahaha. what's the world coming to? Back in the day, there was a guy named Everett Dirksen, Republican Senator from Illinois. To me, he represented exactly what was wrong with Republicans - which is pretty much the same stuff you described - completely beholding to the rich instead of what I call Good Normal Americans. I too have a union background, although it was not me but my father - a member of the UAW, working for General Motors for 37 years. I have a lot of respect for unions in terms of what they did for working class Americans, but even as a kid, I would read "Solidarity", the UAW newspaper, and then I would go to the barber shop or wherever and hear the true views of those union workers, and it was absolutely astounding how wonderful and pro-American and common sense conservative and yes, I suppose even racist in a matter of fact kind of way those guys were - in stark contrast to the vile left wing propaganda put out by their union leadership, and it damn well still is the same way. Eastern elitist dilettantes penning leftist CRAP to propagandize those good hearted sensible working people. Ronald Reagan found a way to overcome that and win the votes of those guys, but both Bushes and most other Republicans before and after have indeed been the way you describe. I have been wracking my brain trying to think of a present day conservative prospect who is the exception to the stuff you say. For me, the pro-American views - strong military, interventionist foreign policy, most social moral issues, etc. are enough for me to hold my nose and support them even though they are hopelessly pawns of the rich. Obviously, for you, that isn't enough. How about Rubio? He certainly doesn't fit the spoiled son of a rich guy stereotype, or Ted Cruz either or even Sarah Palin, although the media has thoroughly messed up any chance she would have had.

OK, you did a good job explaining why you don't support Republicans/conservatives. Now tell me why you don't come down about a hundred times harder on the leftists. Yeah, I know about the Obamacare thing, but basically, other than that, they are the worst of the worst on every issue you seem to care about and much much worse on what I consider most important, keeping America on top in the world. I really think Obama in particular has an agenda - his real goal is to drag America down - and THAT really is TREASONOUS, unlike the troublesome but not life-changing Republican thing of favoring the rich. As long as we stay on top, there is plenty of good life for everybody, never mind that some of the pigs consider themselves more equal than the others. But if the Obama types get there way, we really do ALL go down - rich, poor, middle, working classes alike.


Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
11 years ago



OK, you did a good job explaining why you don't support Republicans/conservatives. Now tell me why you don't come down about a hundred times harder on the leftists. Yeah, I know about the Obamacare thing, but basically, other than that, they are the worst of the worst on every issue you seem to care about and much much worse on what I consider most important, keeping America on top in the world. I really think Obama in particular has an agenda - his real goal is to drag America down - and THAT really is TREASONOUS, unlike the troublesome but not life-changing Republican thing of favoring the rich. As long as we stay on top, there is plenty of good life for everybody, never mind that some of the pigs consider themselves more equal than the others. But if the Obama types get there way, we really do ALL go down - rich, poor, middle, working classes alike.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



You guys beat him up enough, I don't really need to pile on. I don't like the fact that he seems to be just as much of a war monger as his predecessor. I also don't like the fact that he gave up very quickly on his message of evening the playing field. See I don't look at taxing the wealthy as a Robinhood tax system, because in the process of becoming wealthy, they cut a lot of corners and use and step on a lot of little people in obtaining their wealth. Taxing them at the high rates keeps things regulated. I wanted to see Barry get tough on the corporate loopholes and make corporations repatriate all their foreign activity to the United States of America - and he has failed miserably at that.

I do not believe in the current welfare system. Abled bodied people should work. Unfortunately, the good jobs were shipped overseas by the Romneys of the world - which is treasonous. And the spoiled American worker is not going to do the $10 an hour jobs to survive, when they can get welfare. Fixing the things wrong in this country are not that difficult, but they certainly become difficult with the inept politicians we keep electing making guiding us.

As for Marco Rubio, I really don't know that much about him, but that infamous drink of water speech he made didn't leave me very impressed. He seemed to be another lacky spewing the same old agenda I've been turned away from.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (4h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (8h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (10h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (20h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (20h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (20h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
42m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6h / Random Babble / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16h / GameDay Threads / Mucky Tundra

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.