why is it that when a GM doesn't blow the company wad on top-priced FA every season he's too conservative, not risky enough... but when that same GM plays it a little dangerously and risks a draft pick on a player with huge amounts of ability but an injury history, the GM is criticized for being too risky?
People are screaming for him to roll the dice, then he does, and he gets blasted for it.
"bozz_2006" wrote: