note to self: be VEWY VEWY specific when discussing anything with DH. ;)


now having said that, clearly i meant protecting him from an injury or from further injuring his shoulder. wow.

I guess i now understand Packgirl i guess i just wanted your attention like you got me with your "ideas" lol ok the cleavage on your pic 😛

---

After 3 years on the bench watching his predecessor, he doesn't need more time on the bench--he needs to be on the field.

In my opinion, Aaron's great between the 20s/driving down the field, but needs to work on putting it in the end zone/finishing off drives and driving for a touchdown at the end of the game.

We've settled for field goals more often than I would have liked. If some of those FG drives had ended in touchdowns instead, the defensive collapses may not have mattered as much.

Aaron Rodgers is the NFL's highest-rated QB in the red zone, and he has yet to throw an interception. The problem is Mike McCarthy keeps calling runs straight into the teeth of end-zone defenses instead of giving to his QB and letting him make a play.

---

I was just thinking. Getting TDs in the redzone are harder today, than in the past. With the change of the rule on push outs them throw it up fade route is a lot more difficult.

QBs have to throw the ball more in the field of play making it easier for the defenders.

---

I take back the end zone comment, but I don't like using the QB ratings. They don't necessarily correlate with getting the ball in the end zone. No interceptions is a big factor in the QB's rating, but only means that he hasn't cost his team an attempt to make a field goal, doesn't mean they scored a touchdown on the drive.

A better measure is % of touchdowns when in the redzone. Going into this week's game, Green Bay has scored 25 touchdowns on 41 opportunities, or 60.9%, ranking 6th in the NFL (behind IND, DAL, CAR, MIA, and TEN). So, Aaron's not been a slouch at getting it in the end zone from the red zone.