Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
Zero2Cool
16 years ago

Ted Thompson might be the most reviled man in Wisconsin.

Barely a day goes by that this newspaper doesn't receive a letter, e-mail or fax demanding the firing of the Packers' general manager.

Pro football is a tough business, and when you're in charge of a 5-9 team, it's only a matter of time before the vultures begin to circle.

Still, it would have been hard to imagine Thompson's approval rating tumbling to George W. Bush levels in such short order. Exactly 11 months ago today, Thompson was at the pinnacle of success, with the Packers hosting the NFC championship game in just his third year at the helm. Times were good, life was a breeze and victories flowed freely.

The Packers' fortunes have taken a stock market-like nose dive since, and it didn't take long for critics to put Thompson squarely in the crosshairs.

Two seismic events this year contributed to Thompson's steep drop-off in popularity. Trading Brett Favre was guaranteed to incite an angry mob, but when that controversial move was followed by a historic decline in the victory column, the floodgates of dissent opened wide.

Thompson can do nothing right in the eyes of his critics, and every misstep is magnified.

One recent e-mailer wanted to know why no one in the local media has called for Thompson's ouster, considering the Packers have produced just one winning season during his watch.

The answer isn't that complicated. Thompson should keep his job, for the time being, because you don't fire the general manager one season after his team came within an overtime of a Super Bowl berth. Thompson was charged with cleaning up after Mike Sherman, and the Packers were making steady progress until this season. One step backward isn't enough reason to clean house.

It's necessary to take the emotion out of the issue, as well as the immediate frustration of a season gone awry, and look at the big picture. A team doesn't post a 13-3 regular-season record, as the Packers did last year, with smoke and mirrors. There had to be some substance there, and it went beyond the presence of Favre.

If Thompson gets no credit for the 2007 season, then why must he absorb all the blame for 2008? You can't have it both ways.

That doesn't mean Thompson receives a free pass for this year's disappointing record. He's made his share of mistakes.

His inability to infuse the defense with enough talent has resulted in a major breakdown this season, and his attempts to improve the offensive line have come up short. The question marks in the trenches are a major concern, and the Packers' future depends on how that pans out. Thompson's reluctance to make bold moves, such as trading for high-end talent, also has stifled the Packers' progress.

However, Thompson has upgraded the receiving corps, turned the secondary from a weakness to strength and put the long-term future of the quarterback position in good hands.

I'm less convinced now than a year ago that Thompson will guide the Packers to a Super Bowl title, but it's too soon to send him packing. Thompson's team remains a work in progress, and next season will provide a better gauge of which direction the franchise is headed.


UserPostedImage
bozz_2006
16 years ago
haven't read the article yet. just the title. my thoughts: no shit.
UserPostedImage
Packerchick
16 years ago
None of us can really judge the man right away. It maybe rough going for a little while though. We have to be realistic. Am I right?
I am a woman and I love football.
Stevetarded
16 years ago
OMG BRETT FAVRE!!!11!!1!!!!1
blank
brnt247
16 years ago
This guy pretty much feels the same way I do.
blank
Stevetarded
16 years ago
You know now that I'm thinking about it. It would have been a terrible idea to break the bank in free agency last year to take a shot at the superbowl. Nobody knew if Rodgers was gonna be any good. We could have easily ended up with this spectacular team but with JT O'Sullivan back there throwin picks and getting sacked every play.

I am supporting Ted Thompson for the moment till next season. We have a team that has been good enough to get to the NFCC game and we now know that our QB can play. Which makes now the time to get it done. There is absolutely no excuse to have a bad season next year.
blank
Greg C.
16 years ago
I feel exactly the same as the author of the article. I expect results next season, although I won't go so far as to demand a certain amount of victories or a certain amount of success in the playoffs. We'll see how things unfold.
blank
PackFanWithTwins
16 years ago
I like Thompson's approach so far. Cleaned up cap, brought in a couple FA to start the team, drafted and built depth. Now it is time for him to finish the job. We appear to have a QB that is more than capable of getting the job done and the best top to bottom WR group. Plus two serviceable RB. A strong secondary.

The team is to the point where Ted Thompson has to get back to FA to finish the team. At this point, IMO all the draft is going to do is replace young players with other young players, and the time for development is not going to keep up with those that are going to be lost with age.

This is the year Ted Thompson needs to show what he is willing to do. If he makes good FA moves I expect the team to quickly be back to the top of the North and a legitimate contender to make the SB.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
dhazer
16 years ago

I like Thompson's approach so far. Cleaned up cap, brought in a couple FA to start the team, drafted and built depth. Now it is time for him to finish the job. We appear to have a QB that is more than capable of getting the job done and the best top to bottom WR group. Plus two serviceable RB. A strong secondary.

The team is to the point where Ted Thompson has to get back to FA to finish the team. At this point, IMO all the draft is going to do is replace young players with other young players, and the time for development is not going to keep up with those that are going to be lost with age.

This is the year Ted Thompson needs to show what he is willing to do. If he makes good FA moves I expect the team to quickly be back to the top of the North and a legitimate contender to make the SB.

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



Just a few things we DO NOT have a top wr group you forgetting the likes of the Cards, Saints, Colts to name a few. And Ted Thompson will not do anything in FA again, also i keep seeing this and i need someone to please explain this to me. People saying we might have been stuck with another qb where the hell was rodgers going his contract was going thru 2009 so please explain to me where the hell was he going to go?
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
16 years ago


Just a few things we DO NOT have a top wr group you forgetting the likes of the Cards, Saints, Colts to name a few. And Ted Thompson will not do anything in FA again, also i keep seeing this and i need someone to please explain this to me. People saying we might have been stuck with another qb where the hell was rodgers going his contract was going thru 2009 so please explain to me where the hell was he going to go?

"dhazer" wrote:



1-5 I don't know of a team that matches up with WR. 1-3 sure, not 5 IMO.

The assumption that Ted Thompson will not do anything if FA is baseless. He has signed FA, Woodson and Pickett not to mention internal FA's. With the cap, teams really have 2-3 years where FA can be utilized. I believe his strategy is to get the team to the stage where there are good players, a solid base and then use FA to finish the team. He left Seattle at that point and now has GB to that place. It is up to him now to prove those that say he doesn't believe in FA wrong. He only believe in it when the time is right.

As far as Rodgers, I believe if Brett had decided to come back in the beginning that Rodgers would have been traded. I don't think it would have been a smart move to keep both Brett and Aaron for another year.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Fan Shout
buckeyepackfan (44m) : 1 NFC South @ NFC West @ AFC West other 3 games,
buckeyepackfan (49m) : Packers play NFC East and AFC North in 2025, plus 2 other games
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Geeze Zero get it right!😋
Zero2Cool (3h) : I guess 3 games. Whatever
Zero2Cool (3h) : Bleh, that only impacts two games.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers are gonna get 3rd place division schedule next year.
Mucky Tundra (4h) : Kanata, seek help! lol
beast (6h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status
Zero2Cool (7h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha
TheKanataThrilla (7h) : That was terrible.
TheKanataThrilla (7h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.
beast (7h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent
beast (7h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime
beast (7h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing
Zero2Cool (8h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is
Zero2Cool (8h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true
beast (9h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management
wpr (11h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.
Mucky Tundra (18h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (19h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (26-Dec) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (26-Dec) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / go.pack.go.

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

6h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

6h / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

15h / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.