zombieslayer
12 years ago

I was merely attempting to open up the debate amongst us. My basic views are just a tad bit right of Atilla the Hun.



Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



I am neither right nor left. However, I'm an amateur historian (not yet published for profit, thus still amateur status).

Studying history, private citizens need guns. The more, the better.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
DakotaT
12 years ago

I'm not living off the government. I'm living off my wife's brilliance, and my recognition of her brilliance, along with a lifetime of investment in myself and my plans to be in a position to be able to invest in her and her visions. I also worked very hard for her.

I'm getting PAID by the government, (earned, if you knew me) but not living off it, as I'm getting PAID by Home Depot, (earned, if you knew me) but not living off that, either. I missed the game today, as I had to work at the Home Depot. I "had" to work because I was expected to be there. I'm coming up on my 2 year anniversary. I have never been late to work by so much as one minute. They love me, I love them, kumbaya, etc. I give the absolute best advice I can give to every customer I see. It may or may not be in the Home Depot's best interest. It is just my best advice. (Some might remember I'm skilled in the trades- my cheapness) Manglement is totally good with how I roll.

Oh, and I had a contract with the government. I'd really put my life on the line, in all kinds of places, for 30 fucking years, without being able to really bitch about my job. After the 30, I get paid most of what I got paid doing it, plus I get to tell Dakota T to kma. I took it! (The job, lol)
😄

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



Yeah, yeah, yeah - you're still on the dole, but at least you're not one of those fuck hippies turned yuppies who think they get ot cash in now cause they had such a hard life.
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
12 years ago

I am neither right nor left. However, I'm an amateur historian (not yet published for profit, thus still amateur status).

Studying history, private citizens need guns. The more, the better.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



I don't like thug-homie-types with a gun. I don't like West by god Virginia red-neck-types with a gun.

I don't like nut-job-unstable people with a gun. I don't like unsupervised juveniles with a gun. I don't like drunks with a gun.

I don't like neophytes without direction with a gun. I don't like stupid people with a gun...










DakotaT
12 years ago

I don't like thug-homie-types with a gun. I don't like West by god Virginia red-neck-types with a gun.

I don't like nut-job-unstable people with a gun. I don't like unsupervised juveniles with a gun. I don't like drunks with a gun.

I don't like neophytes without direction with a gun. I don't like stupid people with a gun...


Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



You just eliminated about 70% of our population's gun rights. It's a good start.
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
12 years ago

You just eliminated about 70% of our population's gun rights. It's a good start.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



That's about right. We promise to always wear goofy khaki vests over our clothes with a nice big NRA patch on the front-left-top. 🤣


(I'll do that as soon as I join the NRA)

Which part that I'm cuttin' off in my grand-plan is most disconcerting to you?

The druggies, the 'necks, the nuts, or the crazies? (Or pick one)
DakotaT
12 years ago

That's about right. We promise to always wear goofy khaki vests over our clothes with a nice big NRA patch on the front-left-top. 🤣


(I'll do that as soon as I join the NRA)

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



Yeah, I don't belong either. I don't think I need to belong to an organization with Ted Nugent sitting on the board of directors brainstorming for me.

I love me some Stranglehold, Free for All, and and Wang Tang Sweet Poontang - but his politics suck.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
12 years ago
Does anyone belong NRA anymore?

I don't know that I know one under the age of mid 50's or older.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
yooperfan
12 years ago

Does anyone belong NRA anymore?

I don't know that I know one under the age of mid 50's or older.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



I'm a former member.
I left the NRA in the early 90's over their stance on assault rifles.
Now I'm staunchly anti-NRA.
I'm a retired firearms instructor and armorer and I don't believe any common citizen or sportsman needs a firearm with a magazine capacity of more than 5 rounds.

vikesrule
12 years ago

I'm a former member.
I left the NRA in the early 90's over their stance on assault rifles.
Now I'm staunchly anti-NRA.
I'm a retired firearms instructor and armorer and I don't believe any common citizen or sportsman needs a firearm with a magazine capacity of more than 5 rounds.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan 



Completely agree with yoop.


An assault weapon's intrinsic purpose is to kill, wound and threaten living beings. It's why they exist. Period.

The firearms used at Aurora, Tucson, Sandy Hook and so many other mass shootings are specifically categorized as "assault rifles."
The intention is, by definition, to assault. They're aggressive weapons intended to physically attack and do harm.
Otherwise they'd be called "defense weapons" or "protection weapons."

DakotaT
12 years ago

That's about right. We promise to always wear goofy khaki vests over our clothes with a nice big NRA patch on the front-left-top. 🤣


(I'll do that as soon as I join the NRA)

Which part that I'm cuttin' off in my grand-plan is most disconcerting to you?

The druggies, the 'necks, the nuts, or the crazies? (Or pick one)

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



No, I'm fine with all, but I also think you should include stupid. There should be a test that a person must pass in order to have a permit to own any type of gun. If you do not pass the test then it would be a felony for you to own one. This test could also have questions aimed at discovering psychological problems someone might have.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (4m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (1h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (1h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (2h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (2h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (2h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (2h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (2h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (2h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (2h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (2h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (2h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (2h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (2h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (2h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (3h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (3h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (3h) : Packers will get in
beast (3h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (3h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (3h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (6h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (6h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (6h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (7h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (16h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (16h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
57m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.