Zero2Cool
12 years ago
Want to Chat Packers? Click GameDay Chat !

UserPostedImage
Green Bay Packers ( 6 - 3 )
[list]
  • Total Offense = 19th
  • Passing Offense = 12th
  • Rushing Offense = 23rd

  • Total Defense = 13th
  • Passing Defense = 20th
  • Rushing Defense = 11th

  • Points For = 26.6 (10th)
  • Points Against = 20.8 (9th)[/list]


  • UserPostedImage
    Detroit Lions ( 4 - 5 )
    [list]
  • Total Offense = 2nd
  • Passing Offense = 1st
  • Rushing Offense = 24th

  • Total Defense = 10th
  • Passing Defense = 8th
  • Rushing Defense = 19th

  • Points For = 24.0 (13th)
  • [*]Points Against = 24.7 (23rd)[/list]
    UserPostedImage
    gbguy20
    12 years ago
    Spread right now is Packers -3

    considering jumping on it
    BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
    Gaycandybacon
    12 years ago
    Packers win 28-10 we contain their rushing attack and get back to forcing turnovers. Get 2 picks 1 FF.
    zombieslayer
    12 years ago

    Spread right now is Packers -3

    considering jumping on it

    Originally Posted by: gbguy20 



    I'd say it's a pretty safe bet. And my betting track record is all over PH.com.
    My man Donald Driver
    UserPostedImage
    (thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
    2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
    nerdmann
    12 years ago
    PFT 

    Looks like the Loins picked up Pat Lee.

    The Lions have been plagued by injuries in the secondary this season, so being able to acquire a cornerback who was a starter for most of this season has to be welcome news in Detroit.



    They don't mention that Lee was a Packer before being a Raider, which may have some significance in their decision to bring him in.
    “Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
    LambeauEast
    12 years ago
    The Lions are 2nd offensively and 10th defensively?!...I totally did not know that. Interesting record for those ranks.

    I gotta go with the Packers in a nail biter though. 38-35.
    UserPostedImage
    beast
    12 years ago

    The Lions are 2nd offensively and 10th defensively?!...I totally did not know that. Interesting record for those ranks.

    I gotta go with the Packers in a nail biter though. 38-35.

    Originally Posted by: LambeauEast 



    Stats/records can be misleading... teams that are behind normally pass more, passing picks up more yardages than running, and the Lions lead the NFL in pass attempts per game... which is a large reason they're #1 in passing yardage this year (well Calvin Johnson is a bigger reason).

    While teams that are ahead normally run it trying to run out the clock.

    That's why one year... I think before Woodson, with Harris and Carroll... Harris tried to defend the Packers DB, saying they were doing good by pointing to the stats... the Packers defense were near the top of the list of least amount of passing yards and total yards given up...

    But no one seemed to believe it and for good reason... the Packers low amount of passing yardages was because teams didn't need to pass the ball that year, they could run it at will with an injured DL not stopping them... and since they could run at will didn't pass it too much... which is why they had the low yardage that year.


    The Lions defense is letting other teams QB complete 66.1% of the passes which is 5th worst for a defense.


    Packers defense is 6th best... only letting QB complete 57.1%... best two are Houston Texans (54.5) and Arizona Cardinals (55.4)... (like I said, the Cards have won against all the teams that have tried to throw more than run against them (before the Packers game) but the Packers ran more than passed it... which was surprising but smart)...

    The Texans just got out coached... the Texans defense didn't adjust to Rodgers/Packers playing style and got burned... while the Packers did adjust to the Texans playing style and won an important match-ups (OL vs DL)...

    Then again... MM didn't adjust to the Seahawks while probably is what costed that game more than the Refs... but the Refs did help too...
    UserPostedImage
    Gaycandybacon
    12 years ago



    Then again... Mike McCarthy didn't adjust to the Seahawks while probably is what costed that game more than the Refs... but the Refs did help too...

    Originally Posted by: beast 



    Well 🇲🇲 had to adjust something in the 2nd half not giving up a sack after giving up 8 sacks. I think the refs did it all, they took away a int on a bogus roughing the passer on Walden that had us in FG range, Rice held Sam Shields like a baby and called PI on Sam which put them in great field position. And the last play.. [wallme]
    beast
    12 years ago

    Well 🇲🇲 had to adjust something in the 2nd half not giving up a sack after giving up 8 sacks. I think the refs did it all, they took away a int on a bogus roughing the passer on Walden that had us in FG range, Rice held Sam Shields like a baby and called PI on Sam which put them in great field position. And the last play.. [wallme]

    Originally Posted by: Gaycandybacon 



    You're right MM adjusted in the 2nd half... what i meant was he didn't adjust before going into the game.

    The week before playing the Seahawks I pointed out that the Cowboys lost to the Seahawks mainly for two reasons... 1) fumbles on STs 2) no balance on offense... they passed the ball 75% of the time and the seahawks defense knew what was most likely coming were able to pin their ears back and pass rush as hard as they could...

    MM did the same thing in the first half... didn't keep the offense balanced letting the Seahawks pin their ears back and rush straight up the field because they knew it was very high chance it was going to be a pass... which hurt the OL pass blocking...

    Got to mix it up and keep the other team other team guessing some like they did in the Cards game...
    UserPostedImage
    Cheesey
    12 years ago
    I think it's gonna be a close game.
    Hopefully the Packers can pull it out.
    UserPostedImage
    Fan Shout
    wpr (14h) : 7 days
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
    dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
    dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
    Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
    Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
    Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
    dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
    Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
    Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
    Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
    Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
    Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
    wpr (9-Apr) : yay
    Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
    Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
    Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
    Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
    Eagles
    Recent Topics
    7h / Random Babble / wpr

    16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

    28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.