Zero2Cool
12 years ago
Want to Chat Packers? Click GameDay Chat !

UserPostedImage
Green Bay Packers ( 6 - 3 )
[list]
  • Total Offense = 19th
  • Passing Offense = 12th
  • Rushing Offense = 23rd

  • Total Defense = 13th
  • Passing Defense = 20th
  • Rushing Defense = 11th

  • Points For = 26.6 (10th)
  • Points Against = 20.8 (9th)[/list]


  • UserPostedImage
    Detroit Lions ( 4 - 5 )
    [list]
  • Total Offense = 2nd
  • Passing Offense = 1st
  • Rushing Offense = 24th

  • Total Defense = 10th
  • Passing Defense = 8th
  • Rushing Defense = 19th

  • Points For = 24.0 (13th)
  • [*]Points Against = 24.7 (23rd)[/list]
    UserPostedImage
    gbguy20
    12 years ago
    Spread right now is Packers -3

    considering jumping on it
    BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
    Gaycandybacon
    12 years ago
    Packers win 28-10 we contain their rushing attack and get back to forcing turnovers. Get 2 picks 1 FF.
    zombieslayer
    12 years ago

    Spread right now is Packers -3

    considering jumping on it

    Originally Posted by: gbguy20 



    I'd say it's a pretty safe bet. And my betting track record is all over PH.com.
    My man Donald Driver
    UserPostedImage
    (thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
    2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
    nerdmann
    12 years ago
    PFT 

    Looks like the Loins picked up Pat Lee.

    The Lions have been plagued by injuries in the secondary this season, so being able to acquire a cornerback who was a starter for most of this season has to be welcome news in Detroit.



    They don't mention that Lee was a Packer before being a Raider, which may have some significance in their decision to bring him in.
    “Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
    LambeauEast
    12 years ago
    The Lions are 2nd offensively and 10th defensively?!...I totally did not know that. Interesting record for those ranks.

    I gotta go with the Packers in a nail biter though. 38-35.
    UserPostedImage
    beast
    12 years ago

    The Lions are 2nd offensively and 10th defensively?!...I totally did not know that. Interesting record for those ranks.

    I gotta go with the Packers in a nail biter though. 38-35.

    Originally Posted by: LambeauEast 



    Stats/records can be misleading... teams that are behind normally pass more, passing picks up more yardages than running, and the Lions lead the NFL in pass attempts per game... which is a large reason they're #1 in passing yardage this year (well Calvin Johnson is a bigger reason).

    While teams that are ahead normally run it trying to run out the clock.

    That's why one year... I think before Woodson, with Harris and Carroll... Harris tried to defend the Packers DB, saying they were doing good by pointing to the stats... the Packers defense were near the top of the list of least amount of passing yards and total yards given up...

    But no one seemed to believe it and for good reason... the Packers low amount of passing yardages was because teams didn't need to pass the ball that year, they could run it at will with an injured DL not stopping them... and since they could run at will didn't pass it too much... which is why they had the low yardage that year.


    The Lions defense is letting other teams QB complete 66.1% of the passes which is 5th worst for a defense.


    Packers defense is 6th best... only letting QB complete 57.1%... best two are Houston Texans (54.5) and Arizona Cardinals (55.4)... (like I said, the Cards have won against all the teams that have tried to throw more than run against them (before the Packers game) but the Packers ran more than passed it... which was surprising but smart)...

    The Texans just got out coached... the Texans defense didn't adjust to Rodgers/Packers playing style and got burned... while the Packers did adjust to the Texans playing style and won an important match-ups (OL vs DL)...

    Then again... Mike McCarthy didn't adjust to the Seahawks while probably is what costed that game more than the Refs... but the Refs did help too...
    UserPostedImage
    Gaycandybacon
    12 years ago



    Then again... Mike McCarthy didn't adjust to the Seahawks while probably is what costed that game more than the Refs... but the Refs did help too...

    Originally Posted by: beast 



    Well 🇲🇲 had to adjust something in the 2nd half not giving up a sack after giving up 8 sacks. I think the refs did it all, they took away a int on a bogus roughing the passer on Walden that had us in FG range, Rice held Sam Shields like a baby and called PI on Sam which put them in great field position. And the last play.. [wallme]
    beast
    12 years ago

    Well 🇲🇲 had to adjust something in the 2nd half not giving up a sack after giving up 8 sacks. I think the refs did it all, they took away a int on a bogus roughing the passer on Walden that had us in FG range, Rice held Sam Shields like a baby and called PI on Sam which put them in great field position. And the last play.. [wallme]

    Originally Posted by: Gaycandybacon 



    You're right Mike McCarthy adjusted in the 2nd half... what i meant was he didn't adjust before going into the game.

    The week before playing the Seahawks I pointed out that the Cowboys lost to the Seahawks mainly for two reasons... 1) fumbles on STs 2) no balance on offense... they passed the ball 75% of the time and the seahawks defense knew what was most likely coming were able to pin their ears back and pass rush as hard as they could...
    Mike McCarthy did the same thing in the first half... didn't keep the offense balanced letting the Seahawks pin their ears back and rush straight up the field because they knew it was very high chance it was going to be a pass... which hurt the OL pass blocking...

    Got to mix it up and keep the other team other team guessing some like they did in the Cards game...
    UserPostedImage
    Cheesey
    12 years ago
    I think it's gonna be a close game.
    Hopefully the Packers can pull it out.
    UserPostedImage
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (43m) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (43m) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (58m) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (1h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (1h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (1h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    beast (1h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
    Zero2Cool (1h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (1h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    beast (1h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
    beast (1h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
    Zero2Cool (1h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
    Zero2Cool (1h) : I literally just said it.
    packerfanoutwest (1h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
    Zero2Cool (1h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
    Zero2Cool (1h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
    packerfanoutwest (1h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
    Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
    packerfanoutwest (1h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
    packerfanoutwest (1h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
    packerfanoutwest (1h) : if bucs win out they win their division
    beast (1h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
    packerfanoutwest (1h) : falcons are already ahead of us
    beast (1h) : Packers will get in
    beast (1h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
    packerfanoutwest (2h) : they still are in the playoffs
    packerfanoutwest (2h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
    Zero2Cool (3h) : We can say it. We don't play.
    Mucky Tundra (4h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
    Mucky Tundra (5h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
    Mucky Tundra (5h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
    buckeyepackfan (5h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
    Mucky Tundra (14h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
    beast (14h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
    bboystyle (15h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
    buckeyepackfan (18h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
    Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
    Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
    Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
    beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
    beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
    Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
    beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
    packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
    beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
    Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!
    wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    10m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.