wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
12 years ago
I see Fracois being the new ILB. but it won't mean much. They are going to fill that position with DBs, LBers and whatever Capers wants to in order to confuse the offense.

source 


Who is up next? That is the burning question facing the Packers at the inside linebacker position. Right now the Packers haven’t made a move, and even though D.J. Smith is out for the season, there is no real answer for who is going to take his place on the roster (once he goes to IR) or in the lineup. Now this is two different questions, so let’s take a moment to focus on the one most pressing for this weekend….who is going to be playing on the field?

Right now reports are that coach McCarthy is playing coy with the media about this particular question. "We’ll let you see that on Sunday" tends to be the main quote coming out about what is going to be done. That said, there are a few possibilities of who is the next man up. Let’s go through some of the options.

Brad Jones. Jones is a third year man who has just moved to the inside linebacker spot this offseason. He played well in spot duty against the Texans once D.J. Smith came out. He also played well for the injured Aaron Kampan during his 2009 rookie campaign. Traditionally Jones has been pretty good in coverage and very good against the run. He’s also the guy who has the most on the field time than all the replacements. Right now he’s probably the lead dog for the starting spot.

Robert Francois. There’s a very odd Coen brother film called The Man Who Wasn’t There, basically about a guy who gets over his head but consistently gets out of trouble because people just forget he’s around. This gist of this movie fits with Francois for me. Francois has the most experience at the position than all of the replacements. When he’s been called on he’s done pretty well (last year he was the starter for a two game stretch while A.J. Hawk recovered from injury). He’s also a guy that so many of us just forget about because he’s primarily been a special teams contributor. The good news is that when he was in the lineup he was stronger in pass coverage than Smith, although he did not have quite as physical of play as Smith. Right now that could be good with Hawk playing like a madman, but still allowing the big play over the middle once in a while.

Jamari Lattimore. Lattimore is similar to Jones because he is another OLB making the transition to ILB. The main difference though is that Lattimore has mainly done special teams work rather than on the field experience with the defense. That said, he may have had the best training camp and preseason out of the entire linebacker unit and has performed well when he’s had the chance. The problem is that he hasn’t had the chance so far this season. Lattimore sneaking into the lineup just may be that pleasant surprise that energizes the defense.

Terrell Manning. Manning is a guy who captures the imagination of many Packer fans. He was a relatively low round pick, but the Packers did trade up to get him and he was considered a bit of a steal by many draft experts. Then he completely disappeared in camp. Later this was explained by his suffering a concussion and a very rare disease, but still the damage was done for his ability to contribute this season. Right now he may be too far behind to get some real on the field time and contribute….but then again you never know. I would still bet more on next year for Manning than this year.

Clay Matthews. You read that right. I’m not talking about a permanent move mind you, rather just expect an increase in the amount of times you see the Claymaker move to the inside….especially on passing downs. One of the most successful packages this year has been the new look "Psycho" package with Jerel Worthy the down lineman and Nick Perry, Matthews, and Dezman Moses lining up to attack the passer. This package can even continue to be effective while Perry heals up with so many guys with OLB experience ready to come in and contribute. The real secret to this sort of use of Matthews is going to be the play of Erik Walden. If Walden can continue to play as well as he has this year then it shouldn’t be a problem. If Walden’s play drops off since Perry isn’t pushing him anymore than we could be in for a severe drop off in our pass rush no matter where Matthews lines up.

Charles Woodson. On Sunday night you heard lots about how Woodson was being used like an outside linebacker. It’s true, Woodson’s aggressive play and tackling ability does give the Packers the advantage of using him in this capacity. With so many of our current ILB’s a bit raw at the position mixed with the rise of so many young secondary personnel (Casey Hayward, Sam Shields, Davon House, Jerron McMillian, etc.) the Packers could slide Woodson inside to even more of a LB role to give a hybrid dime look. Imagine a 3-3-5 look with Woodson playing about where Smith would line up. Or on long downs it could be a 2-3-6. These formations could work with the talent the Packers have and still allow the team to effectively stuff the run.

The good news about all of this is that the Packers have options to fill in that last ILB spot. The bad news is that so many of the more creative options are also tied into other injuries (e.g. the Perry injury, the Shields injury, and the House injury). The Packers have suffered big blows before and found players who have stepped up and made a name for themselves. This is what saw the rise of Desmond Bishop and D.J. Smith in the first place. Hopefully Jones, Francois, or Lattimore can do the same. If not then I’m happy we have a mad scientist like Dom Capers back there to cook something up to cover this otherwise gaping hole in the defense.


UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
12 years ago
a second question to consider is- who won't fill the position?

Lattimore and Manning will see very few snaps at ILB unless there is another injury.
UserPostedImage
Gaycandybacon
12 years ago
I like Brad Jones. The guy can cover the middle of the field with his speed, and can tackle very well. OLB size playing MLB. We've been looking for that size and speed since Bishop. He'll have an easier time rushing the passer, shooting through gaps and taking on guards and backs. Imo Smith can be a shady tackler, and doesn't have that toughness. So Jones could prove more suitable for the posistion.

I haven't seen much from the other guys.. I like Francois as much as everyone else, so he could push for the job during the season if Jones plays bad.

Manning has some pass rush ablity, but other parts of his game remains to be seen.

Lattimore, I don't know what the coaches saw. He's ahead of Francois on the depth chart, and I thought he would be a OLB.

I think Manning will never fill in, at least this year. Unless we keep getting hit with injurys.
doddpower
12 years ago
I still have high hopes for Manning. I understand he may not be very useful this season, but in the long run, I think he can definitely make a push for a starting MLB position. I could see it taking a few years like it did for Bishop, though.
beast
12 years ago

I find this question a bit odd ... because my first response is, "The guy who replaced him in the last game, will be the same guy the replaced him in future games, unless he's doing a bad job..."

Jones replaced him last game, and I thought he did pretty well there and I think that's Jones natural position in the 3-4 defense.

Also I keep hearing about Francois coverage being so good and better than Smith's coverage last year... I don't believe that. Last year Francois was surprisingly very good to great in zone coverage.... but in man coverage the QB targeted him, throwing the the guy he was suppose to be covering over and over again (while he and Smith were both in the game). And when Smith has been getting burned it's mainly when he's been asked to play man coverage.

So my opinion is ( ">" means "greater than" )
Francois in zone coverage > Smith coverage > Francois in man coverage
UserPostedImage
doddpower
12 years ago

I find this question a bit odd ... because my first response is, "The guy who replaced him in the last game, will be the same guy the replaced him in future games, unless he's doing a bad job..."

Jones replaced him last game, and I thought he did pretty well there and I think that's Jones natural position in the 3-4 defense.

Also I keep hearing about Francois coverage being so good and better than Smith's coverage last year... I don't believe that. Last year Francois was surprisingly very good to great in zone coverage.... but in man coverage the QB targeted him, throwing the the guy he was suppose to be covering over and over again (while he and Smith were both in the game). And when Smith has been getting burned it's mainly when he's been asked to play man coverage.

So my opinion is ( ">" means "greater than" )
Francois in zone coverage > Smith coverage > Francois in man coverage

Originally Posted by: beast 




I don't like seeing the Packer's MLB's in man coverage, period. Hawk, Bishop, Smith, et al., they are all pretty bad in man coverage, mostly because they're slow. Especially Bishop and Smith. I know it's unavoidable at times, but hopefully it can be minimized.

It's tough to evaluate Froncois because he has had minimal playing time. It would be expected that he would improve in all areas of his game as he got more playing time, including man coverage. At least he has a little more speed to make up for some mistakes. Naturally, though, there's no guarantee that he actually would improve, though.
Pack93z
12 years ago
According to Pro Football Focus, DJ Smith's numbers ranked him very highly in coverage. Like top 10 for Backers. Now, we can discuss the validity of their judgement stats.. but I think there is some value in it as they break down every play from every team and tally it in the same fashion.

Personally, what I liked the best with Smith in the middle is the YAC yardage was minimal.. can we expect any Backer to stick with say a Sproles?

Another topic with Smith and Hawk combo.. is that the Tight ends were not exploiting us as in the past.

Hopefully, that remains the case moving forward.  ILB Coverage Week 6.JPG You have insufficient rights to see the content.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Pack93z
12 years ago
Added the stats to the last posts.. seems I was a little off.. top 15. 🤔
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
doddpower
12 years ago

Personally, what I liked the best with Smith in the middle is the YAC yardage was minimal.. can we expect any Backer to stick with say a Sproles?

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



No, which is why I hate to see Dom consistently ask Hawk et al. to do so. It doesn't seem like a call that is putting the players in the best position to make plays. Same with Matt Forte, and several other running backs (and tight ends, too).

Gaycandybacon
12 years ago

According to Pro Football Focus, DJ Smith's numbers ranked him very highly in coverage. Like top 10 for Backers. Now, we can discuss the validity of their judgement stats.. but I think there is some value in it as they break down every play from every team and tally it in the same fashion.

Personally, what I liked the best with Smith in the middle is the YAC yardage was minimal.. can we expect any Backer to stick with say a Sproles?

Another topic with Smith and Hawk combo.. is that the Tight ends were not exploiting us as in the past.

Hopefully, that remains the case moving forward.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



Don't forget Woodson. He covers the TE more now that he's a SS
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (16h) : Packers LT Jordan Morgan did not allow a single pressure across 23 pass-blocking snaps vs. Jets last night, per PFF
Mucky Tundra (20h) : With buckeye and the reasonable couple, we're currently sitting at 10
buckeyepackfan (21h) : Just posted to re-up on our FFL.
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : If healthy after, then thats all I care. Well, no drops would be nice
wpr (10-Aug) : I made it through the 1st Q.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Just gotta figure out how.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
beast (10-Aug) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : Sooooooo many penalties
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Well that half was fun
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Great, zayne is down
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
Mucky Tundra (9-Aug) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Woo-hoo
TheKanataThrilla (9-Aug) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
wpr (7-Aug) : seems faster. yay
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Mucky Tundra (7-Aug) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : I thought that was the Lions OL
Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
4h / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

14h / Around The NFL / packerfanoutwest

21h / Fantasy Sports Talk / buckeyepackfan

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

10-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

10-Aug / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

10-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

8-Aug / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

8-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.