[2012] Green Bay Packers at St Louis Rams· Page 2

warhawk
Senior Member

12 years ago

Probably still recovering from TD shots.

Packers 38, Rams 30. Rodgers for around 300 yards with 3 TDs and 1 INT, Green gets around 80 yards on 23 carries.

Originally Posted by: Porforis

Don't get me wrong I will take any win but I would be disappointed if we gave up 30 points. The Rams haven't scored anywhere near that all year except Washington who has one of the worst scoring defenses in the NFL.

i'm going with 31 to 17. That's more in the range of what the Rams have been able to produce on offense...scoring 6,14,17,19,23,and 31 against the Redskins.

I'm actually pumping up the Packers offense a little more leaning towards a desire to keep the offense rolling rather then falling back again. Important game to keep the O hot Sunday for their own confidence that they have turned the corner so to speak.

"The train is leaving the station."

zombieslayer
Registered

12 years ago

#12

can we get over .500 for the first time this year please?

Originally Posted by: gbguy20

Yeah, really.

I'm not making any predictions because I've been jinxing us and when I don't say anything, we usually have better results. 😣

I will say though that the Rams' rush D is superb. Alex Green won't do much. They held the Cards' main dude to 33 yards on 14 carries and Reggie Bush got 17 yards on 12 carries.

However, their pass D is inadequate. If Ryan Tannehill can have one of his better games against this D, 🇦🇷 should light them up. This is not me being gung ho pass. I'm just saying their rushing D is superb whereas their pass D is average to mediocre. So I'm expecting 🇲🇲 to let Aaron air it out.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

dfosterf
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#13

JAMES Jones!

Sorry, back to your regularly scheduled broadcasting, lol

Gaycandybacon
Member

12 years ago

#14

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer

I think this will give Alex Green a chance to have a breakout game. Remember last week, when Arian Foster(1st or 2nd in the league rushing) was held to 29 yards. So obviously anything can happen. We just need to keep running that ball no matter what 18-25 carries is a winning fourmula for us.

I think it will be a close game, and lower score like the Seahawks game. 20-13 Pack

Gaycandybacon
Member

12 years ago

#15

JAMES Jones!

Sorry, back to your regularly scheduled broadcasting, lol

Originally Posted by: dfosterf

I hope he breaks Don Hustons record with 4 straight games with 2 TDs

Rios39
Member

12 years ago

#16

No excuses to lose this game. We are a far superior team.

blank

zombieslayer
Registered

12 years ago

#17

Originally Posted by: Gaycandybacon

I'd be happy with 25 carries for 30 yards. After all, it's the carries, not the yards that matter.

Green's gonna have a breakout game. It just won't happen against the Rams.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#18

No excuses to lose this game. We are a far superior team.

Originally Posted by: Rios39

Rams 3-3,Packers are 3-3, this seems to be the year of true parody.

Only 2 AFC teams have winning records after 6 weeks(that's just crazy).

Playing on the road is never easy, Rams play much better at home.

Packer Offense "on paper" looks to have the better talent, on defense not that much of a difference.
The young guys play the way they did last week then yes Packers should win this game, but with youth you don't get consistency, let's hope they build on last weeks successes.

Packers 31 - Rams 21

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

Gaycandybacon
Member

12 years ago

#19

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan

Usually, fresh bodies help tremendously ecspecially if they're young and eager to play. Perfect example was Mike Neal, where he steped in the lineup and improved our team.

If Sheilds can't go, I think House will fit in just nicely. He also was a front runner and looked promising before he got hurt.

The rookies haven't been horribly inconsistant, the whole defense just has to be in-sync.

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#20

Originally Posted by: Gaycandybacon

I'm not complaining about their performances, but they are rookiea and mistakes have and will be made.

I was just trying to make the point that at this point in the season The Packers are not a far more superior team all around as The Rams.

Packers will be favored...Charles Woodson"WE ARE NOBODY'S UNDERDOG", love that comment.
Hopefully these young guys will continue to learn, if they do, by the end of the season the, far superior team, post will probably be true.

Packers | Casey Hayward might start in Week 7
Mon, 15 Oct 2012 19:06:57 -0700

If Green Bay Packers CB Sam Shields (shin) is unable to go in Week 7, CB Casey Hayward could move into the starting lineup. He had two interceptions in the Week 6 game against the Houston Texans.

Comment () | Share: | Source: ESPN.com - Kevin Seifert

http://www.kffl.com/team/17/nfl/green-bay-packers#ixzz29cXqdrz6

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (1m) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (2m) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (53m) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (54m) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (1h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (1h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (1h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (1h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (1h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (1h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (1h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (1h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (1h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (1h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (1h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (1h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (1h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (1h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (1h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (1h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (1h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (1h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (1h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (2h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (2h) : Packers will get in

beast (2h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (2h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (2h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (3h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (5h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (5h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (5h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (5h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (14h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (15h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (15h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (18h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other

beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)

Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.

beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs

packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.

beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS