Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
12 years ago

I would HATE to be the President who flips the internet kill switch. I almost guarantee they will not be re-elected. Has there ever been something similar done before?

The internet fuels THOUSANDS of businesses ... wow ... just the thought of the uproar is borderline frightening.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Ask yourself this.. have they ever had the ability before?

Can't use what isn't there.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
12 years ago

Wade - so please advise how we change that?

Internet kill switch, bans on peaceful protests. The withering of our constitutional rights by both parties over the past couple of decades.

Lesser of the two evils approach has failed.. neither is interested in the betterment of this country as a primary objective.

Have become slaves to the two parties?

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



I am increasingly convinced that there are only three possible routes to change:

1. Actual revolution, violence and all. Frankly, I think this is more likely than the other two. But, unfortunately, because we're a nation of ignoramuses/zombies, that route will follow the French example rather than the American -- which means we're in for several generations of revolutions, autocrats, feudal-style oligarchs, Committees for Public Safety, etc. That is, the American experiment will end, and won't be repeated in our lifetime.

2. Constitutional convention. This is where I thought the Tea Party might have headed at some point, had it not been co-opted by the GOP and the usual suspects of PACs, PR departments, influence peddlers, and the like. Add in the fact that the only discussions of constitutional conventions in the last 20 years or so has come from one-issue ideologues (e.g., pro-lifers of a particular sort), and the 3-gens-of-ignorance, and the chance of this reduces to virtually nil. Constitutional convention will either be co-opted by those same influence-peddling power-mongering cynics, made still-born by the know-nothing media labelling them as fringe wackos, or degenerate into revolution of form #1.

3. A significant fraction of the votes cast in national elections go to neither GOP nor DEM candidates. I'm thinking a minimum of 10% and probably needs to be closer to 20 percent. Those other votes don't have to win the election, but they have to be big enough to deny real "democratic" legitimacy to the winners. Only half (or less of eligible voters) are voting now, but as it stands, the winners can always claim close enough to 50% of the votes cast to claim a "mandate" for this year's version of more-of-the-same-shit.

But if the two main candidates are splitting 80% of 50% of the eligible electorate, that means the winner is only going to be able to claim the support of one-fifth of the adult population.

That will do two things. First, it will drive home the completely undemocratic nature of the system we're operating under. Second, it will make it easier for people to run/participate in political life in opposition to both parties. The ending argument "third candidates" always get is "you can't compete with the two big gorillas" to get enough of the vote. But this would allow those third party candidates to say, "sure, if the goal is to get 50 percent of the vote. But I don't have to get 50 percent of the vote, only 20.1 percent. Because that's all your so-called big gorillas can control.

This third to me offers the only real hope for meaningful change without revolution. And that hope is pretty slim.

If I had any meaningful financial assets to invest, and wanted to maximize my possible wealth 10-40 years out, I'd split them half and half. And then I'd put one half into investments that will prosper during a revolution, and the other half into the companies/organizations who I think are most likely to be headed by the controlling after-the-fall oligarchs.

And, no, I don't know what those investments are. Maybe whoever youI expect to win in the current Google v. Apple v. Amazon v. Facebook battle; more likely whoever wins in the next bloodletting battle between giant enterprises AFTER that first megabattle is resolved. And I'm betting most of them are going to be located outside the boundaries of the USA and Western Europe, and I wouldn't be surprised if they are outside the usual China suspects, too.

I still believe that this era offers unprecedented economic opportunity because the primary constraint is the supply of human ingenuity, and there's a lot -- a lot of a lot -- of that around if we could only realized it and put it into play. And I absolutely believe that the American Experiment, even with its federalist bent, is the greatest single political innovation in human history.

Where I despair is that we simply don't have the intelligence/understanding to follow our founder's wisdom. Because we don't even remember or recognize anymore what that wisdom was.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
12 years ago

I would HATE to be the President who flips the internet kill switch. I almost guarantee they will not be re-elected. Has there ever been something similar done before?

The internet fuels THOUSANDS of businesses ... wow ... just the thought of the uproar is borderline frightening.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



The internet actually fuels millions of businesses, not thousands.

But that is, IMO, largely irrelevant. Because the politicians atop the two major parties aren't determined by whether those millions of businesses (most of them "small") are pissed off or not. The big ones they can simply bail out a la the banks and GM. And the small ones they can ignore.

But they're irrelevant especially because those politicians in the end have designed themselves to appeal to the attention spans of gnats (i.e. the typical American consumer). And there are tens of millions of those.

You, and I, and those internet businesses, we're just a bunch of geeks. The parties are a group of oligarchs who treat geeks the way a sweatshop owner treats its employees.

Yeah, Google and Apple can mobilize things a time or two. But Google and Apple are just proto-oligarchs trying to control the battlefield for their particular monopolistic, oligarchic vision. Ask the Chinese whether those "voices of the internet" are part of the solution or part of the problem. Ask the Chinese whether they are a force truly willing to resist those who wish to control the internet. Or merely just a force to take that control for themselves.

Oligarchs worry about other oligarchs. They could care less about the peons. And most of us who are dependent on the internet. We're the definition of the best kind of peons. We are peons who think we actually matter to those at the top.

Hah.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Zero2Cool
12 years ago

The internet actually fuels millions of businesses, not thousands.

Originally Posted by: Wade 


You do understand I know this probably better than most and being technical deviates from the point, right? Okay, thought so. [duh]

I'm going to plug my fingers in my ears and ignore the rest because obviously you think I'm a damn idiot.



(curls in corner with binkie)
UserPostedImage
Porforis
12 years ago

Brutally honest.. I don't want to vote this cycle. I literally want to do things, with recent law changes, that would get me arrested. lol. But honestly is there a candidate worth voting for? If so.. please advise why?

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



If you don't like either candidate, why are you even considering not using your vote? A writein for "None of the Above" is just as valid as voting for a candidate with a chance to win if you're not interested in either candidate winning. If people would stop voting for people they really don't like just because he's not as terrible as the next guy and would instead choose to use their voice in a useful manner, both parties would snap to attention. They'd still be self-serving politicians, but they'd at least be more interested in pandering to YOU, and less to the extremes on either side.
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
12 years ago
Ahhh... not wanting to and not are two very distinct differences. But thanks for the assumption. [grin1]

No worries mate.. just chewing the fat because I absolutely loathe the direction we as a country politically are heading. And I happen to believe the majority of the country is just going to vote either or. Hence the frustration.

Really the frustration is those that are towing the party lines just to tow it.The distinctions between the parties is just their visions on which policies will drive them to overspend and to be reelected.

We fight with each other on the behalves of parties that really aren't in it for us.. they are in it to be reelected and what policies help them in that cause.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Formo
12 years ago


We fight with each other on the behalves of parties that really aren't in it for us.. they are in it to be reelected and what policies help them in that cause.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



Yup. Truth.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Porforis
12 years ago

Ahhh... not wanting to and not are two very distinct differences. But thanks for the assumption. [grin1]

No worries mate.. just chewing the fat because I absolutely loathe the direction we as a country politically are heading. And I happen to believe the majority of the country is just going to vote either or. Hence the frustration.

Really the frustration is those that are towing the party lines just to tow it.The distinctions between the parties is just their visions on which policies will drive them to overspend and to be reelected.

We fight with each other on the behalves of parties that really aren't in it for us.. they are in it to be reelected and what policies help them in that cause.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



I definitely get the frustration, and I'm going to need to drag myself to the polls. But I'll do it, and I'll use my voice to express my opinion, rather than using it to say I support more mediocrity.

I've made predictions in the past regarding the election, that Obama would win by 5-8% of the popular vote. I think the recent fiascos in Cairo and Libya (specifically comments very early on condemning a no-name movie that was a ridiculous pretext to the attacks) will give Romney a bit of a bump, but unless this turns into utter insanity it's not going to be enough to save him. I just hope that there's enough country left by the time Americans pull their heads out of their asses to turn things around.
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
12 years ago

You do understand I know this probably better than most and being technical deviates from the point, right? Okay, thought so. [duh]

I'm going to plug my fingers in my ears and ignore the rest because obviously you think I'm a damn idiot.



(curls in corner with binkie)

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Nah. I"m not sure how you got that from what I said.

Oh, I think you (and most everyone here, for that matter) are generally too often too willing to give the government/politicians the benefit of the doubt. I don't trust them to do what is right OR to do what makes sense. I'm shocked on the rare occasions they do get something right.

And as I've said before, I would prefer to think of and call said government actors/politicians idiots (because I think the alternative often would be that they are evil).

But I don't think you are an idiot. The notion that those idiots might try to flip the kill switchis frightening.

I can't think of a single situation where killing the internet makes sense. Maybe if there's potential for a massive power failure and its a choice between powering the internet and powering hospitals, traffic lights, and such. But other than that?

I can't think of a single economic or moral reason for doing so.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
12 years ago



First, I think more Americans need to declare their independence from partisan politics on both sides. The more that Americans declare their independence, the more the parties will have to compete for their votes using reason rather than the hateful appeals. ~ John Avlon



"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2h) : Anthony Perkins spent 2024 as a defensive quality-control coach with the Packers.
Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers lose another assistant.
Zero2Cool (6h) : Defensive Player of the Year and Browns star Myles Garrett has requested a trade.
Zero2Cool (9h) : deleted all my browser history and autofill and passwords. gonna be fun!
packerfanoutwest (22h) : too funny
packerfanoutwest (22h) : Lions QB Jared Goff was the offensive MVP
packerfanoutwest (22h) : for the Pro Bowl, which is flag football
Zero2Cool (23h) : Rather, the murder WAS covered up to prevent ...
Zero2Cool (23h) : JFK murder was a cover-up to prevent war with Cuba/Russia.
Martha Careful (1-Feb) : I have always admired the pluck of the man
Zero2Cool (1-Feb) : I remember thinking he was going to be something good.
Mucky Tundra (1-Feb) : The Dualing Banjo!
Zero2Cool (31-Jan) : Jets have named Chris Banjo as their special teams coordinator, Former Packers player
Zero2Cool (31-Jan) : Jaguars have hired Anthony Campanile as their DC. We lose coach
Zero2Cool (30-Jan) : QB coach Sean Mannion
Zero2Cool (30-Jan) : DL Coach DeMarcus Covington
dfosterf (30-Jan) : from ft Belvoir, Quantico and points south. Somber reminder of this tragedy at Reagan Nat Airport
dfosterf (30-Jan) : So eerily quiet here in Alexandria. I live in the flight path of commercial craft coming from the south and west, plus the military craft
dfosterf (30-Jan) : So eeri
Mucky Tundra (30-Jan) : Now that's a thought, maybe they're looking at the college ranks? Maybe not head coaches but DC/assistant DCs with league experience?
beast (30-Jan) : College Coaches wouldn't want that publicly, as it would hurt recruiting and they might not get the job.
beast (30-Jan) : I thought they were supposed to publicly announce them, at least the NFL ones. Hafley was from college, so I believe different rules.
Mucky Tundra (30-Jan) : Who knows who they're interviewing? I mean, nobody knew about Hafley and then out of nowhere he was hired
beast (30-Jan) : I wonder what's taking so long with hiring a DL coach, 2 of the 3 known to interview have already been hired elsewhere.
Zero2Cool (27-Jan) : Packers coach Matt LaFleur hires Luke Getsy as senior assistant, extends Rich Bisaccia's deal
Zero2Cool (27-Jan) : Chiefs again huh? I guess another Super Bowl I'll be finding something else to do.
Mucky Tundra (27-Jan) : Chiefs Eagles...again...sigh
dfosterf (27-Jan) : Happy Birthday Dave!
Mucky Tundra (27-Jan) : happy birthday dhazer
TheKanataThrilla (26-Jan) : Exactly buck...Washington came up with the ball. It is just a shitty coincidence one week later
buckeyepackfan (26-Jan) : I forgot, they corrected the call a week later. Lol btw HAPPY BIRTHDAY dhazer!
buckeyepackfan (26-Jan) : That brings up the question, why wasn't Nixon down by contact? I think that was the point Kanata was making.
buckeyepackfan (26-Jan) : Turnovers rule, win the turnover battle, win the game.
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : well, he was
TheKanataThrilla (26-Jan) : Eagles down by contact on the fumble....fuck you NFL
Mucky Tundra (26-Jan) : I think this games over
beast (26-Jan) : Eagles sure get a lot of fumbles on kickoffs
Mucky Tundra (26-Jan) : This game looks too big for Washington
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,
beast (26-Jan) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)
beast (26-Jan) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab
Zero2Cool (25-Jan) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
now / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

1-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

1-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

27-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.