[2012] Green Bay Packers vs Chicago Bears

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

Want to Chat Packers? Click GameDay Chat !

Green Bay Packers ( 0 - 1 )
[list]

Total Offense = 19th

Passing Offense = 11th

Rushing Offense = 27th

Total Defense = 21st

Passing Defense = 6th

Rushing Defense = 31st

Points For = 22.0 (19th)

Points Against = 30.0 (23rd)[/list]

Chicago Bears ( 1 - 0 )
[list]

Total Offense = 6th

Passing Offense = 3rd

Rushing Offense = 14th

Total Defense = 18th

Passing Defense = 26th

Rushing Defense = 8th

Points For = 41.0 (3rd)

Points Against = 21.0 (13th)[/list]

Chicago Bears ENEMY FORUMS!

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

yooperfan
Veteran Member

12 years ago

I hate that the Packers have to play this game on 3 days rest (I don't give a damn that the Bears have to).
The Packers coaching staff have some big adjustments to make following the Niners game,particularly on defense.
Hopefully they come up with something, and quick, or this could be a review of ugly.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

I don't feel the Packers have big adjustments to make. From what I seen, they need to execute better and they'll be good.

LambeauEast
Rookie

12 years ago

I agree, there are no adjustments to be made...they won't help. Man I really don't want to see another game in just 4 days, it can't be a good outcome in my opinion. I'll just go with last week's prediction.

Bears - 27
Packers - 24

I hope I'm wrong, obviously.

yooperfan
Veteran Member

12 years ago

Originally Posted by: LambeauEast

"No adjustments", really, there are always adjustments to be made.
The Packers run defense sucks and the communication in the secondary is terrible.
Definately some big adjustments to be made possibly including personnel in the secondary.
The Packers run blocking is nonexistant, needs some adjustment, possibly including the coaching.

I certainly hope you are wrong about the outcome.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

"No adjustments", really, there are always adjustments to be made.
The Packers run defense sucks and the communication in the secondary is terrible.
Definitely some big adjustments to be made possibly including personnel in the secondary.
The Packers run blocking is nonexistant, needs some adjustment, possibly including the coaching.

I certainly hope you are wrong about the outcome.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

You're arguing semantics here. Obviously adjustments are done from series to series. Communication is an execution issue, not an adjustment issue.

I didn't care for seeing Jarrett Bush out there so much. Then they plugged in Sam Shields and went back an forth. Either stay with Bush or stay with Shields. Go all in with one of them.

The big adjustments comment is a bit overboard in my opinion. This was the first game of the season and we fans were spoiled. It's time to be grounded and be realistic.

vikesrule
Registered

12 years ago

Patiently awaiting zombieslayer's prognostication.....

yooperfan
Veteran Member

12 years ago

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

So you don't think there are game to game adjustments?
It is time to be realistic.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

So you don't think there are game to game adjustments?
It is time to be realistic.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

Yes sir, that is what I was saying was obvious as there are adjustments from series to series. I should have taken that further to be more clear and said adjustments are made from series to series as well as game to game. The point I was making was there always small adjustments. The tone I am getting from WE NEED TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS! is the Packers need to make BIG adjustments. I do not agree with that. They need to EXECUTE better because no adjustment is going to make up for lack of execution.

zombieslayer
Registered

12 years ago

#10

Patiently awaiting zombieslayer's prognostication.....

Originally Posted by: vikesrule

I'm not predicting this game. We'll split with each of our NFC North division opponents. You had your chance to win something big. I would have said sweep + points. Too late now.

The real Packers have showed their hand. Too many fans here are giving the Niners credit. No, the Niners are good, but that's it. They're not gonna win the conference. It's just the Packers are an average team.

We over-achieved last year and this year, it's the same crap defensively. We'll once again have an elite O and a crappy D, and go one and done.

I watched da Bears game and they looked like they were having fun out there. But you never know with 🇦🇷. He might just throw 5 TD passes and win the game for us. Or, he might have an average day.

Either way, the D will stink and allow 25+ points. It's all up to 🇦🇷 to win this game.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

wpr (5h) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb

wpr (9-Apr) : yay

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'

Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22