dfosterf
12 years ago
We have to stockpile money and expect to lose beloved players. Aaron Rodgers is not going to re-sign for friggin' Dhazer money.

There is no reason to think Rodgers will not be the highest paid player ever, as this is written. We have a cap. I don't see how we don't lose many players we would love to keep. I gotta shrug my shoulders and hope this works out. I like Greg just fine.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
12 years ago
I don't see Greg as demanding the top shelf WR money. he will want to be well paid but not hold them up.

Aaron's contract will impact how much they can pay Gregorious.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
12 years ago
Dodd - Players have careers after football.

Let's just say hypothetically you go into Sales, as a lot of former NFL players do. You WILL make more money if you're a multiple SB winning Hall of Famer than if you're just a really, really good player.

Let's take a look at Terry Bradshaw. I don't think anyone would list him in their top 5 QBs of all-time. However, no doubt he makes TONS of money as an announcer on Fox. I don't think anyone would put Bradshaw ahead of Marino on their best QBs list. Yet, where is Marino? He's making ads for weight loss. How pathetic is that?

Let's hypothetically say Marino won 4 SBs and Bradshaw won 0. Is there any doubt that their post-NFL roles would be completely reversed?

See what I'm getting at?

There are still a lot of working years after the NFL.



http://sports.yahoo.com/news/nfl--prominent-nfl-agent-drew-rosenhaus-scrutinized-for-relationship-with-former-financial-adviser-.html 

I hope you all will now take me seriously when I say agents have too much power over a player. I think Gregorious may be getting shafted by his agent. From what I've read about the guy, he seems like a Rosenhaus. I don't like him.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
12 years ago
looks like Greg was too smart to get involved in a gambling operation.
UserPostedImage
doddpower
12 years ago

Dodd - Players have careers after football.

Let's just say hypothetically you go into Sales, as a lot of former NFL players do. You WILL make more money if you're a multiple SB winning Hall of Famer than if you're just a really, really good player.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



I would think someone that made many millions would have PLENTY of options for a career after football, all of which are likely pay better than a broadcaster. Think of the investments that would be possible. The possibilities are limitless. Dan Marino has also spent some time in the booth, I believe. He also has dabbled in Nascar ownership, has appeared in movies, etc. Terry Bradshaw has personality first and foremost. He's not simply on the air because he won a lot of super bowls, but admittedly that doesn't hurt. The point is, that example doesn't prove anything to me, as both are still successful. Obviously winning 3+ super bowls doesn't hurt, but I don't see that as a big deal as far as making money after football.

Also, life after football for someone who has made $100+ million throughout their football career would have to be more about occupying their time than the money, right? As high as the salaries in the NFL are now, especially for QBs, wow. Favre won a super bowl, but he will never need to work. I'm sure he'll find something to do, perhaps in broadcasting eventually, but it won't be because he needs to. The $22 million or whatever the Vikings paid him guaranteed that, as if it wasn't already. I can't see any job outside of actually playing football being about the money at all for the modern day super star players. Perhaps 20 years ago, sure, because the contracts weren't as absurd. The only way it should happen to a super star today is if they mis-manage their money, and that's a different story entirely.

Zero2Cool
12 years ago

Let's hypothetically say Marino won 4 SBs and Bradshaw won 0. Is there any doubt that their post-NFL roles would be completely reversed?

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



The Super Bowl rings have nothing to do with this example. Dan Marion is a loose cannon and has no on screen charisma. Terry Bradshaw might be a halfwit, but at least he's entertaining on the tv screen.

Some people are just good on the screen and some aren't, it doesn't have anything to do with Super Bowl rings. If it did, why isn't Tiki Barber on our screens or countless others who have come and gone?

Your point is definitely valid in Sales because former NFL player does not sound as good as Super Bowl winning player. But then again, multiple really doesn't have a sales ring to it either.

Drew Rosenhaus is useless and agents control players too much, both things I've been pounding that drum since you were in diapers. Agents are right there with Lawyers and Journalists.
UserPostedImage
porky88
12 years ago

Not the way that I read it, carefully crafted to include fan friendly words as loyalty and using the illustration that the 20 weeks and that is it picture. Maybe over reading it, but opening week prior to his contract year and openly stating he has a number in mind and nothing else is worth talking about.

Nah, I buy it as a PR statement crafted to maximize his play. I just think if a Superbowl is his focus, this is a poorly timed statement in that regard, but brilliant for his contract goal. Heard this on ESPN and Bill Micheals already, it is getting notice for his cause. Another week or so.. probably gets less run, but everyone is chomping at the bit, so it gets overplayed.

Now, lets really discuss what used to be the overvaluing of Running backs which now seems to have shifted to the receiver position. Guys are simply getting overpaid in a passing league currently that is looking at past production in situations where receivers can succeed on less talent.

The game has morphed where almost all the advantage has shifted to the receivers and you don't see 1 or 2 superstars, many are putting up inflated numbers and looking like superstars. Guys like Laurent Robinson once washed out, rises to semi stardom in a single season.

Routes don't have to be as clean, guys can cross the middle with less risk due to increased protection rules, less contact everything allows these cats to produce more with less talent. The contract this offseason scream of desperation from struggling teams in this passing league looking for a spark. Spending big on good, yet not great wide outs isn't going to solve the problems. This league now one offense revolves around QB play. Don't have it.. you better bring a defense and a running game to the table. Both dominate units as well.. either that or continue to struggle. A good offensive coordinator with the ability to maximize the advantages to the rules helps as well.

So does it make sense to spend 12 million of a 120 million dollar cap on a single receiver.. probably not unless he is an elite talent. Sorry but when I see Jennings, I don't see Megatron, Fritz or a healthy Johnson. He just isn't in that tier IMO. Neither is a guy like Vincent Jackson.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 


I don't necessary disagree on his value or the value of wide receivers.

However, I don't see anything here. Nobody will remember these comments five weeks from now. The rest of the league isn't worried about Greg Jennings' contract. They're worried about their opponent on Sunday or Monday.

I also can't imagine Jennings or his agent believing this could scare Green Bay into caving into his demands down the road. Let’s assume this is a leverage ploy. It’s a stupid one. This same team traded Brett Favre. They’re not afraid of making the hard choices.

Plus, let’s not overstate the impact this has on the game or the season. San Francisco can beat Green Bay with or without Greg Jennings talking about his contract. This has no impact on the game or the focus of the long-term goal, which is a Super Bowl championship. It’s also unrealistic not to expect a player to think about his contract. They all do it regardless of whether their team is 15-1 or 1-15. Not to mention what he says is 100% true.

The Packers have enough depth at receiver that the position isn’t a priority. For example, Clay Mathews, Aaron Rodgers, B.J. Raji, and even Bryan Bulaga have contracts worth extending the next two off-seasons. They're probably a higher priority, but I'm not a cap czar. I'm sure the team could fit Jennings into their plans as well.
PackerTraxx
12 years ago
Weird time for this to come up. My guess is those involved will just ignore it. Greg is not a top tier talent but he is important to our team so I hope we can keep him. But those mentioned above are more important. So, let's hope for the best and plan for the worst.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
Pack93z
12 years ago

I don't necessary disagree on his value or the value of wide receivers.

However, I don't see anything here. Nobody will remember these comments five weeks from now. The rest of the league isn't worried about Greg Jennings' contract. They're worried about their opponent on Sunday or Monday.

I also can't imagine Jennings or his agent believing this could scare Green Bay into caving into his demands down the road. Let’s assume this is a leverage ploy. It’s a stupid one. This same team traded Brett Favre. They’re not afraid of making the hard choices.

Originally Posted by: porky88 



I care less about what the rest of the league has to say about this, nor if they remember it. My opinion is that the reporters are going to ask just about every player now on the roster about Greg's comments. Maybe they all answer it without causing a stir, but maybe they don't.

The point is simply this, not trying to overstate the importance, but why if your goals are to win a Superbowl do you open the door for something that may become a distraction inside the Packer locker room. That is it.. I expect Rodgers, Finley, Nelson, Raji, Matthews, Woodson all to be asked probably today. Then the reporters will dig into the next wave of players until they find a soundbite that they can use.

Again, it was a self serving statement that does nothing positive for the Packers. It may turn into nothing, but it certainly may grow legs, especially if this team struggles for any stretch this season. Just doesn't appear to be the type of statement a team player makes. Simply put.


"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
12 years ago
Luckily, I don't see Greg Jennings pulling something similar to what we seen in 1994.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (40m) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (2h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (2h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (2h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (4h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (15h) : don't care
Zero2Cool (20h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

22h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.