beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
12 years ago

I wonder if they're comfortable with Ryan Picket or Jerel Worthy at nose if something happens to Raji. That probably left Muir expendable.

Originally Posted by: porky88 



Pickett best role/position is NT. So I don't know why they wouldn't be comfortable with him there as long as he's healthy. The reason he's not playing there is because Raji is better there and has more pass rush which is nice up the middle.

Also another reason they probably choose to let Muir go is because he couldn't handle double teams in the run game. He'd got pushed back often in two games against double teams.

UserPostedImage
play2win
12 years ago
I guess the whole NT thing is a bit of a mind bender, for me. I was for Muir sticking with the team, simply for NT depth. What I failed to realize, is they are probably going to use less of Pick & Raji together, with Pick playing more DE/DT like he has been the past few years. Maybe Pick & Raji work in rotation now at NT, with the other additions rotating alongside.

Really do not get keeping 5 RBs, and Brad Jones at LB. ??? Crazy. If all you are keeping Jones for is STs, why not keep Gurley, a player with far more STs potential? I don't get that at all.

Roster still in flux though, and I feel confident that they will get it worked out.
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
12 years ago

I guess the whole NT thing is a bit of a mind bender, for me. I was for Muir sticking with the team, simply for NT depth. What I failed to realize, is they are probably going to use less of Pick & Raji together, with Pick playing more DE/DT like he has been the past few years. Maybe Pick & Raji work in rotation now at NT, with the other additions rotating alongside.

Really do not get keeping 5 RBs, and Brad Jones at LB. ??? Crazy. If all you are keeping Jones for is STs, why not keep Gurley, a player with far more STs potential? I don't get that at all.

Roster still in flux though, and I feel confident that they will get it worked out.

Originally Posted by: play2win 



Yeah the coaches said they're going to run more nickel and dime which I'm assuming means more 2 DL fronts. In that front it's a pass rush position (Picketts weakness) and they'll probably be playing Raji/Worthy/Daniels/Merling there more if they can. And that could save Pickett for the 3-4 weather it's NT or DE.


As far as the RBs and LBs numbers I think that all had to do with injuries.

They kept 4 RBs (and a FB) and Starks is injured, so it's 3 RBs and Saine keeps getting hurt and hasn't played much, so it's 2 RBs that have proven to stay healthy in training camp, which is a light number, which is why they kept 2 more though they haven't proven to stay healthy.

At ILB they kept 5... BUT Lattimore(ankle) and Francois(hamstring) are hurt, so they kept another guy with potential (Manning) but Manning looked lost at times even in that last game, I think he's still trying to learn the system.

Jones on the other hand might be a one game spot holder for Walden, but he also has practiced and played at both ILB and OLB and knows the system. So he might be the ILB back-up for game one. And then get cut for Walden... and Manning will become the back-up if Lattimore of Francois aren't healthy by then.
UserPostedImage
doddpower
12 years ago

My thoughts...

I don’t get Andrew Quarless and Brandon Saine, but Packer fans love these guys.

Originally Posted by: porky88 



I only half-way like Saine because he has the most speed of the Packer's running backs, by far. I suppose I hope he can be coached up in other areas. The Packer's don't have much speed from top to bottom, so it's nice to see someone with some ability there. Obviously the Packer's agree, as he was good enough to make it through the first round of cuts. I wouldn't be surprised to see him cut at some point thought.

Re: Quarless: I don't agree that he's a "poor mans Crabtree" at all. Quarless is much faster, and Crabtree is a a better blocker. Quarless has (had?) more raw physical ability than Crabtree, but Crabtree gets more out of what he has. Again, it's a potential thing with the hope that the coaches can bring out the best in him. Considering the severity of his injury, he should probably go back on IR and prepare for one last run for the roster next season. I remember reading reports that Quarless was quickly becoming the best blocking tight end on the roster leading up to his injury. I'm not a huge fan of him, but if he realizes his full potential, there's no question he could be much better than Crabtree. Crabtree is a very marginal talent, to me, who is likely kept around for his blocking ability, which is valuable with a weak left side of the offensive line. No defense is going to be seriously concerned about his receiving ability or fear him stretching the defense. If he's in a game, they're going to allow him to get some catches underneath because they know he's not a serious threat to beat them. Honestly, I'm surprised he keeps making the roster, especially with a guy like Taylor making it as well.

But as I said, I don't see Quarless being able to contribute at all this season, and he may never be the same after his injury. Hopefully he goes to IR and makes the most of his last chance to make the roster in 2013.

beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
12 years ago

It works for me that they didn't pick anyone up.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



According to some of the writers on twitter, no one claimed a Packer on waivers ether (they would have to cut one of their 53 and put that player on the 53 man roster).

BUT Vikings did sign WR Gurley to their practice squad.

Packers signed

T Andrew Datko (6-6, 315)

WR Diondre Borel (6-0, 199)

RB Marc Tyler (5-11, 230)

DE Lawrence Guy (6-4, 304)

TE Brandon Bostick (6-3, 245)

OL Greg Van Roten (6-3, 303)

QB B.J. Coleman (6-3, 231)

This article  wrote:



Edit: One more to go...
UserPostedImage
doddpower
12 years ago
I'm glad to see Coleman back. I think he could take the backup job from Harrell as soon as next season. I like his arm strength. I suppose it will come down to the mental aspect for him.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
12 years ago

The Green Bay Packers will probably make some waiver claims this morning, which will change the make-up of the 53-man roster they assembled on Friday, but here are the initial surprises.

Brandon Saine, running back — You could throw the oft-injured James Starks in this category too, but Saine played even less than Starks during the preseason. First, it was a surprise the Packers kept four running backs — five, if you count fullback John Kuhn. Second, it was a surprise Saine was one of them.

Jarrett Boykin, receiver — If you look strictly at his play, it’s no surprise at all the Packers kept Boykin. If you look at the odds, it’s a big one. Boykin is an undrafted rookie. He beat out the more highly-touted Diondre Borel and Tori Gurley for the Packers sixth receiver spot. Throw in the fact that the Packers don’t usually keep six receivers and you can see Boykin took a longer road than anybody to make the 53.

Don Barclay, guard — Barclay is another undrafted rookie. He improved throughout camp, so the fact that he’s still around isn’t overly surprisingly. The fact that he’s one of only two backups — the other being Evan Dietrich-Smith — on the offensive line is.

Phillip Merling, defensive end — Merling earned the bust label after washing out in Miami after being selected in the second round. The Packers gave him new life and he slowly came on during training camp. Ultimately, he beat out Daniel Muir, who seemed like a lock a week ago, for a roster spot.

Terrell Manning, linebacker — How can a guy go through the entire preseason, show absolutely nothing and end up on the final roster? The fact that he was a fifth-round pick, I guess.

Dezman Moses, linebacker — At this point, Moses being on the roster isn’t a surprise. We’ll just list him because he’s an undrafted rookie.

Sean Richardson, safety — Richardson is the fourth undrafted rookie to make the Packers roster. He played alongside Casey Hayward at Vanderbilt. He can hit, although he has some work to do in coverage. Interestingly, the Packers chose Richardson over Anthony Levine.

Brandian Ross, cornerback — Ross was an undrafted free agent in 2011. Frankly, this is probably the biggest surprise of the bunch. Not only have we not noticed him on the field, but we know next to nothing about him.

total packers  wrote:


UserPostedImage
nerdmann
12 years ago

I'm glad to see Coleman back. I think he could take the backup job from Harrell as soon as next season. I like his arm strength. I suppose it will come down to the mental aspect for him.

Originally Posted by: doddpower 



Wise career move for him to stick around and take MM's QB school next offseason.

Dude could get a big contract in 3 years.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
12 years ago

Terrell Manning, linebacker — How can a guy go through the entire preseason, show absolutely nothing and end up on the final roster? The fact that he was a fifth-round pick, I guess.

Sean Richardson, safety — Richardson is the fourth undrafted rookie to make the Packers roster. He played alongside Casey Hayward at Vanderbilt. He can hit, although he has some work to do in coverage. Interestingly, the Packers chose Richardson over Anthony Levine.

Brandian Ross, cornerback — Ross was an undrafted free agent in 2011. Frankly, this is probably the biggest surprise of the bunch. Not only have we not noticed him on the field, but we know next to nothing about him.

Originally Posted by: total packers 



I noticed Ross a ton heck he might of shown up more than the other CBs but didn't have the hype. He looked a lot like Jarrett Bush, in all of the good ways (didn't think you'd ever hear that did you?) But Ross (like Bush) was very aggressive, physical and VERY good tackler. Also (unlike Bush) when the play broke down, Ross would normally find the ball carrier and chase him down. Not always getting the official tackle but he'd force the runner to look else where for an open lane and someone would make the tackle. I think he earned his spot on the team from what he showed in the preseason games.

Overall I think Levine was slightly better than Richardson, BUT Richardson is a rookie, Levine is a 3rd year guy... Levine should of been a lot better than a rookie and because he wasn't got to go with the potential of the young buck who showed he can compete and look good doing it while learning the playbook at the same time.

I think Manning looked lost on defense at times. So I'm guessing STs and potential got him in? Also maybe the injuries to Lattimore and Francois. Jones and Manning would be the next back-ups to them and Jones might be cut once Walden serves his one game suspension.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
TheKanataThrilla (2h) : Hope to see everyone in the Chat tonight!!! Go Pack Go!!!
TheKanataThrilla (2h) : Jeanty would be a great pick-up for the Bears. I see Warren mocked to them as well who I think would be a great selection.
Zero2Cool (3h) : GameDay Chat is open. Posting bits an tids in there.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Excellent Source: The Bears have a deal in place to move up to 5 if Jeanty is there.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Probably not until 10pm will be making pick
dfosterf (5h) : But it is still not tonight. Lol
wpr (5h) : Today is finally here.
dfosterf (6h) : I should have put it in quotes
dfosterf (6h) : It is the title of a you tube video.
dfosterf (6h) : I'm not assuming anything
beast (12h) : If they aren't doing it, then why are you assuming they know how to do it?
dfosterf (18h) : Mackelvie
dfosterf (18h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?
dfosterf (18h) : Youtube
Zero2Cool (23h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (23-Apr) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (23-Apr) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
59m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

5h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.