Graham Harrell not to be cut· Page 7

nyrpack
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#61

Do you think Graham Harrell has done enough to warrant the backup job in Green Bay?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

absolutely not !!

get somebody in here or pray aaron stays healthy !!

jimmy b.

steveishere
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#62

absolutely not !!

get somebody in here or pray aaron stays healthy !!

Originally Posted by: nyrpack

Is "somebody" a good QB?

earthquake
Member

12 years ago

#63

Maybe the Packers can trade for this "Flynn" guy from the Seahawks, looks like he lost out on the starting QB competition to some short kid from UW.

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

#64

Maybe the Packers can trade for this "Flynn" guy from the Seahawks, looks like he lost out on the starting QB competition to some short kid from UW.

Originally Posted by: earthquake

No chance. Too expensive.

earthquake
Member

12 years ago

#65

No chance. Too expensive.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Nahhh, I've heard he's pretty good. Holds some sort of single game TD record. Came in and out played the guy he was backing up... Whats his name? Mr. Roger.... Roger Staubach, I think that was it, yeah!

In all seriousness though, looks like TJack is heading to the Bills, why the Bills want him I have no idea. Hopefully that ends any speculation of that guy coming to GB.

If Flynn can't beat Russell out for the QB spot in Seattle, I think all the melodrama regarding Harrell's ability is overblown. Either Russel Wilson is the second coming of Drew Brees, or Flynn wasn't really all that good to begin with, and GB simply knows how to game plan to showcase a quaterback, in which case I like Harrell's chances.

Or option C: Pete Carrol is an idiot, equally as plausible.

blank

beast
Select Member

12 years ago

#66

looks like TJack is heading to the Bills, why the Bills want him I have no idea. Hopefully that ends any speculation of that guy coming to GB.

Originally Posted by: earthquake

Because the Bills QB have been playing pretty badly... T-Jack might be an upgrade... at least for the back-ups (Vince Young, Tyler Thigpen) but hey... maybe we can pick up Vince Young now...

Though Young seems like he could be getting worse... and heard a rumor he might be a head case... he's got a powerful arm and he's fast and quick... of course Andy Reid had him... and nicely told him they're decided to go in a different direction... there might of been a reason...

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

#67

Originally Posted by: earthquake

I think Russell Wilson getting the starting job is more about Wilson playing well than Matt Flynn. I haven't seen much of either of them playing in a Seahawks uniform, but Wilson adds mobility which is a good thing if your OL sucks.

gotarace
Senior Member

12 years ago

#68

Flynn sat out the game this week with a elbow injury. He hasn't shown the flash of excellence he did in Green Bay. Wilson on the other hand was 13-of-19 passing for 185 yards, two touchdowns and a passer rating of 134.8. He also has rushed for 58 yards in their last preseason game.

Smart As a Horse
Hung Like Einstein

shield4life
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#69

Feel bad for Flynn ... he should of never signed for the 'Hawks ... should of took a bit less to go to Miami.

Glad To Be A Packers Fan.

PackerTraxx
Senior Member

12 years ago

#70

Russell Wilson was/is much better than the vast majority of people think he is, myself included. When he transferred to UW many North Carollina State fans came on the Scout forum raving about him. Most UW fans liked to hear it thinking he would be pretty good but that NCS fans were way overhyping him. He turned out to be better than anticipated and as good or better than the hype. He is very intelligent, poised, quick thinking, mobil, athletic, accurate, has a good arm and a quick release. If he were 6'2" he would have been right up there with Luck and RGIII. I was hoping he would fall to a 5th or 6th pick and that we could have gotten him, thinking he would be a good backup QB. It looks like he may surprise again and be a good starter. Time will tell.

I still think Ted Thompson stands pat, unless we can pick up a definite improvement, that fits/knows our system, VERY CHEAP. And I think the odds of that happening are very slim. It's still hard to get an accurate read on Harrell in my mind. I know practically everything he's done has been bad, but that's also true of nearly all the second string offense.

Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (6m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (14m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (26m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (4h) : Packers will get in

beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS