I hope the Packers don't go into the draft thinking they need to draft X amount of players at Y position.
Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool
They won't. But it's more like BPA between needed positions. For instance, we're not taking a QB in round 1.I think Play2Win and I were both saying "it would be nice if..."
Originally Posted by: zombieslayer
only because the BPA @ 28 isn't a QB. Should RG3 fall to 28 ... [aiee]
Originally Posted by: wpr
Oddly enough, I remember similar comments about Alex Smith/Aaron Rodgers in 2005 and most were saying no way the Packers take a QB because they are "too close" to being a Super Bowl contender. Oh gosh, I remember those awful discussions too. *cringe*
They traded with Denver to get him. They gave up a 1st, 3rd and 4th for the future back of the Bears. [duh]
The even more [palm] move in this draft was by the Raiders. They were in desperate need of a QB, traded up one spot before the Packers and took Fabian Washington instead of Aaron Rodgers. [grin1] Good ol' Al maybe didn't like Rodgers' 40.
Originally Posted by: GermanGilbert
The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close